![]() |
Originally Posted by KC10 FATboy
(Post 837043)
I think it has more to do about protecting the quality and marketing of the type of pilots hired than it does with what military pilots wanted.
Both DALPA and DAL are very conscious of the DAL brand. Military pilots would flock to other airlines if they had to start at DAL flying a regional for low pay. I think they were more worried about losing the military pipeline than anything else. Also, I was not referring to DAL. I was referring to ALPA using its capital for military pilots over dues paying ALPA members and how that is wrong. |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 837532)
Just so I understand this -
Moak signs LOAs that many Delta pilots disagree with and the blame is on... Moak. Lawson writes a letter that many Comair pilots disagree with and the blame is on... all Comair pilots. I'm scratching my head. :confused: I try to not include the Comair guys who were hired there after that period, FWIW-- |
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 837629)
When LM does something we disagree with, you'll hear plenty of dissent in the ranks. When JCL wrote that letter, we heard......nothing. Absent any other evidence, that silence equals approval, IMO.
I try to not include the Comair guys who were hired there after that period, FWIW-- How would you hear? Jumpseats? Web board threads? Trick them into thinking you are Wilson Polling? There were plenty of pilots who were surprised by JC's missive and plenty who thought it was a bad idea. We might talk to each other, but how often would we (you and I) engage another airline's jumpseater with a "hey our MEC Chair stinks" type conversation? Most of us keep jump seat chatter very polite. You also assume the average Comair guy was even aware of the letter. Certainly awareness was much higher on the Delta side than the Comair side. I'm just curious how do you know these things and objectively quantify them? |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 837588)
Moak has generally done pretty well, but when he makes a stupid decision we jump and scream, and change has happened.
|
Originally Posted by Fly4hire
(Post 837616)
Not to you specifically - Other than the Compass Q&A statement, and a Code-a-phone saying they were sold do we have any other facts to support all the hand wringing and teeth-gnashing over what the future of the flows are?
I love a good conspiracy theory, but isn't all of this a little premature until we hear what, *if any* changes are being proposed? 1) The 60-day window to re-negotiate the flow agreement was required by DAL as part of the purchase agreement. Failure to accept this term was a deal breaker. 2) The terms were described as such: CPZ, CP-ALPA, DAL, and D-ALPA are to sit down to re-negotiate the terms of the flow which will be limited to 60 days. If acceptable terms are agreed upon, then the flow (in its new form) will remain in place. If terms are not agreed upon after 60 days, CPZ managment (per the purchase agreement) must exercise the clause in the PWA that allows them to unilaterally cancel the flow UP portion of the flow agreement. 3) The CPZ president talks a lot without saying much of use to anyone. After a few days of thought, I am of the feeling that there is something else is going on here. The pieces do not add up and I can't shake the feeling that this is step one of many. But I've been known to be wrong a few times before. |
Originally Posted by Ad Lib
(Post 837650)
Any examples?
Then things improved in the communication side significantly with a better flow of the quality of information which was greatly appreciated especially as we went into the HND, CPZ MEC split and slot swap. We started to get more insight into the MEC and a lot of things began to make more sense as time and company events unfolded. Although much of the communication has had to be limited for good reason. Operating in silence isn't a bad thing. Eventually the bayonets were put down and repalced by calmer waters and general silliness on the L&G-Delta thread.
Originally Posted by RoughLandings
(Post 837658)
After a few days of thought, I am of the feeling that there is something else is going on here. The pieces do not add up and I can't shake the feeling that this is step one of many. But I've been known to be wrong a few times before. |
Originally Posted by Ad Lib
"From 1999 to 2000 Comair and ASA were bought by Delta Air Lines. Their code became Delta code." Ohhh no, no, no... Ad Lib you subscribe to the typical faulty premise of RJDC spinmiesters. ASA and CMR flew - DELTA - code, under strict conditions set forth in the Delta Pilots PWA. CMR code did not "become" Delta code just because of wholly owned subsidiary status. You are not a Delta pilot just because you fly Delta code under subsidiary contract. Wholly owned or not. I've heard this all before, 10 years ago from Dan Ford and others. He had this fantasy that CMR was really Delta now because of "operational integration", "wholly owned", "flying Delta code", blah, blah, blah. He felt this obligated ALPA to merge seniority lists, and yes, they wanted a DOH list. RJDC and fruitless lawsuits followed. Haberman and the lawyers got rich and Comair still is what it is today. It was all very tiring and pointless then, and I'm getting weary just thinking about it now. Sorry I even turned this smarmy rock over again. |
Originally Posted by UGBSM
(Post 837662)
Ohhh no, no, no...
Ad Lib you subscribe to the typical faulty premise of RJDC spinmiesters. ASA and CMR flew - DELTA - code, under strict conditions set forth in the Delta Pilots PWA. CMR code did not "become" Delta code just because of wholly owned subsidiary status. You are not a Delta pilot just because you fly Delta code under subsidiary contract. Wholly owned or not. |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 837537)
UGBSM, you'll notice JungleBus lists EMB-175 CA as his position. As none of these aircraft found their way to Comair, I'd say JungleBus is not suffering from Comair's strike-driven woes.
|
Originally Posted by imasaluki
(Post 837674)
Wow, you must have a really big one. You probably had to be there to recognize the audacity of the CMR MEC leadership at the time. Im sure it looks petty to outsiders now, over a decade later. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands