![]() |
Originally Posted by UGBSM
(Post 837680)
Yes, I see now. So the CMR strike probably was a good thing for him. It no doubt funneled more flying his way.
The Comair guys significantly raised the bar for regional pilots. The contract they struck to get led directly to the signing of excellent contracts at Horizon and Air Wisconsin, in the same way that the NWA guys striking in 98 helped secure C2K at DL. Pattern bargaining, of course, plus providing management everywhere with a sobering look at the potential consequences if they don't play ball. In the end, you're right, the strike and their increased costs made Comair a goat in Delta's eyes and they've been thrashed accordingly ever since, their flying farmed out elsewhere to lowest bidders. It's simply too easy to shift contracted flying around under current scope clauses for regional pilots to significantly raise the bar and not be beat down. My original response to you wasn't stating that the strike was ultimately good for Comair pilots, but it was something that we as trade unionists should recognize as a positive step for our profession rather than denigrate. |
And for what it's worth, I'm not a big fan of the RJDC, JD Lawson, or the despicable CMR policy of making DL furloughees resign their DL seniority. I just feel the more unity there is across airlines and across regional-major lines, the stronger ALPA will be.
|
Originally Posted by E1Out
(Post 837567)
Wow. I'm glad someone finally said it.
I have tried more times than I care to count to explain to people that this was not a "Comair Pilot Group" decision, but a "JC Lawson" decision. I've heard the argument that the Comair Pilots should have "done something" to stop it if they really didn't approve of it. Somehow my retort of, "Just like we can stop LM from doing something we don't approve of? :rolleyes:" doesn't seem to register. I understand the frustration and apparent feeling of betrayal that a wholly-owned subsidiary won't accept the parent company's pilots when they are furloughing. And I'm truly sorry all of those pilots hit the street without a job - I've been there, and it sucks. But this was truly a case of 2 Regional MEC Chairmen attempting to prove whose **** was bigger, and Lawson lost that egocentric game, at his Pilot Group's expense. I hate that the Comair Pilot Group is still paying the price after all these years, due to misplaced blame. Sorry for the thread hijack - I'm just so relieved to hear that someone else "gets it," and I couldn't help but chime in. |
I saw pilots standing up to JC Lawson and saying it was a bad idea, even Comair pilots.
I told him it was a bad idea standing in the hall underneath ATL gate C23 when he came to town. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 837661)
Scope and Compass were big. It was all over the L&G thread, a website was created called Combine Compass and then the LEC elections happened and there was a lot of anti-LM rancor leading up to those. Not to mention LOA's coming out of nowhere signed sealed and delivered and people bieng upset. Not to mention the whole CPZ MEC split issue. And then there were complaints about communication with DALPA. The silence from the MEC and LM was replaced with fears the MEC wasn't protecting only a portion of the pilot group.
Then things improved in the communication side significantly with a better flow of the quality of information which was greatly appreciated especially as we went into the HND, CPZ MEC split and slot swap. We started to get more insight into the MEC and a lot of things began to make more sense as time and company events unfolded. Although much of the communication has had to be limited for good reason. Operating in silence isn't a bad thing. Threats on the horizon are:
It is difficult to say if there has been any changes in our Chairman's actual positions. I suspected his promotion of flow through agreements was political, but many disagreed and believe his sincerity on the subject. His talking points have been updated and are more respectful of those with scope concerns. Our current scope isn't as strong as it could be, because it does not make a lot of objective sense. The regional guys will eventually leverage these weaknesses and ally with management if we get forced into concessionary bargaining. Holes, as I see them:
|
You are back Bar, where have you been?
|
PM sent. Mostly got burned out on APC. Figured I would skip the "I told you so's" and wait until there was some actual new negotiations to try to weigh in on.
The sale of Compass was yesterday's news the minute the representational vote was tallied. Now management wants to negotiate scope. Those "discussions" are the actual news, since they presage future activity. |
Bar,
Welcome back. I was hoping to see what you thought about all this. Good stuff, let me reread #277 above a few more times and take it all in. You're still the best informed guy on regional issues I've read. Thanks for taking time to post. Ferd |
[HTML]IF the Compass guys get shellacked and fight it, then he, UGBSM and Brake Chatter will have a whole new group to enjoy beating down. Save your torches and pitchforks boys for the next group of uppidty regional pilots./HTML]
Do you really want to have this conversation? |
Originally Posted by brakechatter
(Post 837837)
[HTML]IF the Compass guys get shellacked and fight it, then he, UGBSM and Brake Chatter will have a whole new group to enjoy beating down. Save your torches and pitchforks boys for the next group of uppidty regional pilots./HTML]
Do you really want to have this conversation? The only thing bringing up all of this stuff that happened eight plus years ago does is reopen very deep wounds. It is divisive and helps no one. CPS guys learn from the past. There may be opportunities here, but presupposing the debate is not a good primer. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands