Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement at age 70

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-20-2019, 05:51 PM
  #371  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
A free pass on what? Like I said, call it like I see it. Maybe the truth hurts?
Right here, when you posted a factually incorrect comment intended to say that military guys aren’t crashing planes:

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
You are out to lunch.

When was the last time a military guy crashed a US airliner?

The recent ones were all civilian pilots. Sully and Tammy Jo did save a bunch of people though.
It’s okay to walk it back and say you were out of line.
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 09:08 PM
  #372  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pangolin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Position: CRJ9 CA
Posts: 4,083
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
Right here, when you posted a factually incorrect comment intended to say that military guys aren’t crashing planes:



It’s okay to walk it back and say you were out of line.
Military or not - it’s not the old guys.
pangolin is offline  
Old 03-20-2019, 10:01 PM
  #373  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,422
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Sorry, I was referring to pax airlines.

Cargo guys generally crash because they are tired. I'm not even familiar with FDX 80 but if it was an MD11 the probable cause in my book was the MD11 widowmaker not the pilots.
Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
A free pass on what? Like I said, call it like I see it. Maybe the truth hurts?
you literally gave these guys a free pass. btw AA1420 was also 2 ex mil pilots and had nothing to do with the MD80 they were flying.
Gone Flying is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 03:04 AM
  #374  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Military or not - it’s not the old guys.
It’s pilots of all ages. Still doesn’t mean that 65 isn’t reasonable as a mandatory age
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:40 AM
  #375  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,324
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
Right here, when you posted a factually incorrect comment intended to say that military guys aren’t crashing planes:



It’s okay to walk it back and say you were out of line.
We'll have to disagree on that.

For clarity I was talking about recent pax accidents involving fatalities. Recent being this century. Cargo is apples to oranges.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:46 AM
  #376  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Ok.. let's not turn this into a military vs. civilian pilot thing. Military pilots have crashed plenty of military aircraft. Civilian pilots have crashed plenty of commercial aircraft and of course we can account for more than a handful of ex-military pilots involved in commercial aircraft crashes over the last few decades. We're all human. We can argue that military pilots are better trained than their civilian counterparts, but we can also say most civ-only pilots have more hours in the air given the same years of experience. When the holes align in the swiss cheese, things like fatigue, complacency, sensory overload, disorientation, weather phenomenon, mechanical failure, etc. can all kill the best of us. I have flown with some questionable pilots during my time in the military. Our vetting process is fairly cut-throat and we've got some excellent aviators, but all of the mil-IP types here can attest to flying with a few questionable pilots during their military careera who will most likely be commercial pilots some day, if not already. You know who those people are (the career copilots). May not happen too often in the CAF world, but AMC has plenty of them.
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:50 AM
  #377  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
We'll have to disagree on that.

For clarity I was talking about recent pax accidents involving fatalities. Recent being this century. Cargo is apples to oranges.
“For clarity, I was intentionally limiting my sample to one accident because I totally understand statistics”

It’s almost hilarious how hard you’re trying to give a free pass you claim to not be giving.
OOfff is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 07:59 AM
  #378  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,324
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff View Post
“For clarity, I was intentionally limiting my sample to one accident because I totally understand statistics”

It’s almost hilarious how hard you’re trying to give a free pass you claim to not be giving.
Calling it like I see it. If it makes you feel any better, I think the problem with civilian pilots in general is that the standards are inconsistent and vary wildly over time. The actual standards are driven by economics, and the rock bottom legal standard is marginal, even with 1500 hours. We may be approaching another low point. So nothing against any particular civilian pilot, it's more the system (of which I'm an alumni).

In the last century if you looked for a problem with pilots, it was probably going to be a drunk ex-mil pilot with dangerous attitudes of one type or another. Today it's the crop of civilian noobs, hired for their ability to qualify for ATP aeronautical experience mins with little to no regard for personality or attitudes. If you don't see that, you're probably a senior widebody pilot at the big three.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 08:13 AM
  #379  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2011
Position: A Nobody
Posts: 1,559
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
Calling it like I see it. If it makes you feel any better, I think the problem with civilian pilots in general is that the standards are inconsistent and vary wildly over time. The actual standards are driven by economics, and the rock bottom legal standard is marginal, even with 1500 hours. We may be approaching another low point. So nothing against any particular civilian pilot, it's more the system (of which I'm an alumni).
The problem with civil verses military training isn't the lack of standards it's the lack of a disciplined continued training and checking process. The military takes men and women with zero experience and by the time they get 250 hours they are flying combat missions in highly advanced airplanes and often carrying weapons of mass destruction.

If you want the civil programs to mirror those of the military then you'd better get a huge FAA budget for oversight and regular evaluations.

BTW the reason you don't hear of military crashes is because it rarely involves the deaths of civilians. The military is about death and destruction in an effort to protect the rest of us. When a single seat fighter goes down it just doesn't make the news in the same way as a MAX.

But the question at hand of this thread is 70 year old pilots. Personally, as I approach those years, my opinion is we need to move over and let the next generation advance the throttles. To do otherwise is basically delusional and selfish (of course those two may go hand in hand).
Regularguy is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 08:16 AM
  #380  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: UNA
Posts: 4,422
Default

Originally Posted by TankerDriver View Post
Ok.. let's not turn this into a military vs. civilian pilot thing. Military pilots have crashed plenty of military aircraft. Civilian pilots have crashed plenty of commercial aircraft and of course we can account for more than a handful of ex-military pilots involved in commercial aircraft crashes over the last few decades. We're all human. We can argue that military pilots are better trained than their civilian counterparts, but we can also say most civ-only pilots have more hours in the air given the same years of experience. When the holes align in the swiss cheese, things like fatigue, complacency, sensory overload, disorientation, weather phenomenon, mechanical failure, etc. can all kill the best of us. I have flown with some questionable pilots during my time in the military. Our vetting process is fairly cut-throat and we've got some excellent aviators, but all of the mil-IP types here can attest to flying with a few questionable pilots during their military careera who will most likely be commercial pilots some day, if not already. You know who those people are (the career copilots). May not happen too often in the CAF world, but AMC has plenty of them.
I am not trying to turn this into civ/mil and am genuinely sorry if it came across that way. thanks for the summary and from my experience as a civ only pilot I can see that most mil pilots I have flown with are really good. I just get annoyed when people say things like all airliners crash due to civ pilots.
Gone Flying is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
8-capt
Cargo
44
11-18-2009 11:42 PM
Bucking Bar
Aviation Law
69
07-18-2009 06:48 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 06:04 AM
hjs1971
Military
12
12-01-2008 01:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices