Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Retirement at age 70

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-21-2019, 08:50 AM
  #381  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

Originally Posted by Regularguy View Post
BTW the reason you don't hear of military crashes is because it rarely involves the deaths of civilians. The military is about death and destruction in an effort to protect the rest of us. When a single seat fighter goes down it just doesn't make the news in the same way as a MAX.
I've been in the military a long time, military safety stats are irrelevant to civilian flying, the military has to take peacetime training risks to maximize wartime effectiveness.

Originally Posted by Regularguy View Post
But the question at hand of this thread is 70 year old pilots. Personally, as I approach those years, my opinion is we need to move over and let the next generation advance the throttles. To do otherwise is basically delusional and selfish (of course those two may go hand in hand).
I think 67 is about as far as you can go without being unreasonable... or implementing truly invasive medical and cog screening.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:51 AM
  #382  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by Bozo the pilot View Post
BS- it should be raised if you can hold a medical. 65 is arbitrary just as was 60.
Isn’t any number arbitrary? And sounds like if you go to a certain doc in FL you can pass if you can write the check.

Anything more than 65 and there better be real medicals by real doctors. Institute the Japanese medical and watch the dominoes fall at the top of the seniority list. Be careful for what you wish for. You may just raise the age and zap your career at an earlier age.

If ALPA learned anything from the last editon of raising the age they will not support an increase. Backing an age increase will hurt ALPA as the troops won’t sit quietly by the side again.
PDRit is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:38 AM
  #383  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I think 67 is about as far as you can go without being unreasonable... or implementing truly invasive medical and cog screening.
Fortunate that Austailia, New Zealand and Japan don’t agree with your assessment.
captjns is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 11:41 AM
  #384  
Gets Weekends Off
 
captjns's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,912
Default

Originally Posted by PDRit View Post
If ALPA learned anything from the last editon of raising the age they will not support an increase. Backing an age increase will hurt ALPA as the troops won’t sit quietly by the side again.
Well who endorsed ratification of retirement plan terminations? Who said “Better take a pay cut... or else.”

How else could a pilot retire on less than 50 percent of anticipated retirement benefits after the wage and benefits concessions made by the members?

Sure things are better, for the moment that is. Pay has gone up... profit sharing and 401(k) matches are up... why raise the age.
captjns is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 12:29 PM
  #385  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,281
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
Fortunate that Austailia, New Zealand and Japan don’t agree with your assessment.
I said you could probably go to 67 without additional screening. I know Japan is 67. Are the others as well?

But I was talking about the US... politically there would have to be more screening at age 70, too many folks would make too much noise and the reaction (over-reaction?) would be strong. It's not just science, it's politics.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 12:42 PM
  #386  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I said you could probably go to 67 without additional screening. I know Japan is 67. Are the others as well?

But I was talking about the US... politically there would have to be more screening at age 70, too many folks would make too much noise and the reaction (over-reaction?) would be strong. It's not just science, it's politics.
We can also statistically prove that Japan has a higher life expectancy than we do, by over 6 years. They are #2 in the world at 85.52. The U.S. is 53rd at 79.25.
TankerDriver is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 01:35 PM
  #387  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2018
Posts: 153
Default

Originally Posted by captjns View Post
Well who endorsed ratification of retirement plan terminations? Who said “Better take a pay cut... or else.”

How else could a pilot retire on less than 50 percent of anticipated retirement benefits after the wage and benefits concessions made by the members?

Sure things are better, for the moment that is. Pay has gone up... profit sharing and 401(k) matches are up... why raise the age.
I don’t think there should be an age increase.
PDRit is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 05:34 PM
  #388  
Pilot Response
 
Joined APC: May 2011
Position: A320 Captain
Posts: 479
Default

Institute the Japanese medical and watch the dominoes fall at the top of the seniority list. Be careful for what you wish for. You may just raise the age and zap your career at an earlier age.

Bingo! A Slippery Slope if there ever was one.
NFLUALNFL is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 08:54 PM
  #389  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Retired SWA /NOPD. on the sofa looking and bored
Posts: 39
Default

Is anyone in the government actually taking about changing the retirement age or just the people on airline pilot central? If I do a google search all I can find is a link to discussions here.
xcop is offline  
Old 03-21-2019, 09:02 PM
  #390  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by xcop View Post
Is anyone in the government actually taking about changing the retirement age or just the people on airline pilot central? If I do a google search all I can find is a link to discussions here.
No one is. It's not a thing at all.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
8-capt
Cargo
44
11-18-2009 11:42 PM
Bucking Bar
Aviation Law
69
07-18-2009 06:48 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM
numbersguy
Cargo
91
03-11-2009 06:04 AM
hjs1971
Military
12
12-01-2008 01:24 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices