Delta Pilots Association
#1521
The DPA message ("message", because there is no plan) is based on assumptions.
Emotional pilots will buy into it. Anger is a powerful thing. Thinking pilots will recognize the pig-in-a-poke basis of DPA's "plan" and opt for imperfect, but repairable representation and services from ALPA.
Emotional pilots will buy into it. Anger is a powerful thing. Thinking pilots will recognize the pig-in-a-poke basis of DPA's "plan" and opt for imperfect, but repairable representation and services from ALPA.
#1523
#1524
Between the bankruptcy filing (September, 2005) and now, there have been no gains for the pilot group, and no significant achievements. No successful mergers, no difficult negotiations, no reductions in RJs.
You need fresh batteries in your memory.
You need fresh batteries in your memory.
#1525
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Of course you don't.
You have to know what you're looking for, first.
Prater's biggest failing was his handling of the USAirways-American West merger. Moak's biggest success was his handling of the Northwest-Delta merger. You can dismiss the leadership differences, and spend your time finding fault, but fortunately, there was someone who got the job done despite your superior plan for success.
You have to know what you're looking for, first.
Prater's biggest failing was his handling of the USAirways-American West merger. Moak's biggest success was his handling of the Northwest-Delta merger. You can dismiss the leadership differences, and spend your time finding fault, but fortunately, there was someone who got the job done despite your superior plan for success.
And not to defend Prater one bit, but what was he supposed to do when both sides agreed to binding arbitration and then one didn't like the end result? Even if he was "successful" getting it overturned, a DOH-style integration would have been just as contentious and equally not viewed as a "success" by the other half of the merger and/or the rest of the entire industry.
Moak sold scope, defended it, claimed it was job security and is now the top guy in a regional heavy membership structure. Maybe he will do a good job. I agree 100% that we don't need a "burn it down" Dubinsky approach at the MEC or national level and that diplomacy paves the way for progress to a large extent. But defending, promoting or tolerating scope sales past, present or future, even and especially by dodging the issue in the first place, is unacceptable. That someone could be on record defending prior agreements allowing management to sell more and more of your flying to the lowest bidder, and then acting suprised that when they do exactly that then the flying you still have faces increased negative pressure on wages, especially after bragging about how such scope sales would benefit mainline pay in the first place, is absolute and complete insanity, lack of intellect or both. To then ignore the issue and pretend it will just go away just so you can get political points for a national office that you claimed on more than one occasion that you weren't guning for, well that is suspiscious at best.
Part of Prater's problem was yelling "taking it back" and then not. So Moak will solve the yelling about it problem. But will he actually do it? Is it fair for us to base our predictions on how he will handle things going forward based on his unappologetic actions in the past? If yes, then what exactly other than some extremely vague "working together" rhetoric leads us to believe he won't pencil whip any and every scope sale that comes along and in all likelyhood maybe even be behind most or all of them in the first place?
Using the DL/NW merger's relative success (and it really was, compared to almost any other large merger in history) what do we have to base such cockeyed optimism on? Especially in light of Moak's epic fail of a position on Scope previously and his complete lack of acknowledgement of the issue since then?
I'll give him a chance to the extent that we pretty much have to right now. But it will absolutely be trust but verify, which as we know is code for a significant lack of trust in the first place.
#1526
"Scope sales" is an interesting perspective in light of the dramatic reduction in RJs in the Delta brand. Delta is profitable, growing, and hiring pilots. The number of RJs continues to shrink. I think Moak had an big influence on those facts.
#1527
"Line in the sand."
Need I say more.
He had a bigger influence than me, he was the master chairman for crying out loud. He just did not proactively gain one inch of ground for the Delta pilots.
#1528
The DPA message ("message", because there is no plan) is based on assumptions.
Emotional pilots will buy into it. Anger is a powerful thing. Thinking pilots will recognize the pig-in-a-poke basis of DPA's "plan" and opt for imperfect, but repairable representation and services from ALPA.
Emotional pilots will buy into it. Anger is a powerful thing. Thinking pilots will recognize the pig-in-a-poke basis of DPA's "plan" and opt for imperfect, but repairable representation and services from ALPA.
Carl
#1529
Super Moderator
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
[QUOTE=Splash;889280]"Scope sales" is an interesting perspective in light of the dramatic reduction in RJs in the Delta brand. Delta is profitable, growing, and hiring pilots. The number of RJs continues to shrink. I think Moak had an big influence on those facts.[/QUOT
I think he meant Scope sales "happened" in the past, meaning Scope was sold. This does not preclude the number of RJs shrinking today, which is good news. Although I believe, economically, vice DALPA driven. The bad news, however is that 50 seaters are being replaced as much as allowable with 70 and 76 seaters, which by the way, someone mentioned will have in-flight internet capability installed. To me this means that they are here to stay.
As a side note, Don't believe anything you hear about Delta having any kind of "Brand." You can not have a "Brand" when you outsource to 10 different lowest bid service providers. When was the last time you checked into a Hilton and were told - "Here is your key, go down the hall out the door and across the street to the Motel 6 - your in room 255. Whats that? You thought you were staying in a Hilton Hotel? - Oh you must have missed the fine print on our website: Rooms often provided by Motel 6 and fly by night Hotel.
Scoop
I think he meant Scope sales "happened" in the past, meaning Scope was sold. This does not preclude the number of RJs shrinking today, which is good news. Although I believe, economically, vice DALPA driven. The bad news, however is that 50 seaters are being replaced as much as allowable with 70 and 76 seaters, which by the way, someone mentioned will have in-flight internet capability installed. To me this means that they are here to stay.
As a side note, Don't believe anything you hear about Delta having any kind of "Brand." You can not have a "Brand" when you outsource to 10 different lowest bid service providers. When was the last time you checked into a Hilton and were told - "Here is your key, go down the hall out the door and across the street to the Motel 6 - your in room 255. Whats that? You thought you were staying in a Hilton Hotel? - Oh you must have missed the fine print on our website: Rooms often provided by Motel 6 and fly by night Hotel.
Scoop
Last edited by Scoop; 10-23-2010 at 06:04 PM.
#1530
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM