Delta Pilots Association
#7632
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
You are correct.
I saw no indication what so ever that the DPA's position on "unity" was any different than ALPA's. What will probably be necessary is for a critical mass of former "RJ Trash" to become voting members at the mainline carriers. Most have been pretty well educated as a result of all the problems they've had on the express level.
I should hasten to add that NO ONE called a meeting on the Pinnacle breach of the Admin Manual and no one objected to the MECs unilateral finding without debate.
I saw no indication what so ever that the DPA's position on "unity" was any different than ALPA's. What will probably be necessary is for a critical mass of former "RJ Trash" to become voting members at the mainline carriers. Most have been pretty well educated as a result of all the problems they've had on the express level.
I should hasten to add that NO ONE called a meeting on the Pinnacle breach of the Admin Manual and no one objected to the MECs unilateral finding without debate.
I know you think that the AM Section 40 was violated in spirit. Scope as you define it is all of section 1 where some think it is planes alone.(Section 1 Subpart C) I know there are concerns with the C&BL Article IV Section 2 a and b, but what other concerns are there wrt to precedences being set?
-First time a enhanced hiring scheme was not codified in our PWA?
- DALPA being silent on the issue allows for a stronger legal precedence being set going forward?
-If it is technically legal wrt to the C&BL and AM what recourse is there to make this a one time event that will limit actions that could hurt this pilot group down the road?
-Is being silent on this issue the best course of action for this group when this deal is ugly and starts the whipsaw of the DCI brand all over again? (Do we really want to codify a the cookie in a bad deal that drops DCI 9E pay by about 20%?)
-I know you want the MEC to defend the AM and C&BL but are there possible issues with doing so that you cannot see?
-Now that the Bridge Agreement is signed and done, what recourse if acceptable from the MEC?
-Have you discussed these actions with your current or incoming reps?
I suspect this will be discussed at length by the reps either officially or unofficially.
#7633
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
#7634
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: No to large RJs
Small RJs might be on the decline but jumbo RJs are on the increase.
Or put another way, the uneconomical RJs that the company no longer wants are being parked and replaced by new larger more economical RJs that the company wants.
One other way to put it, we agreed to reduce the RJ fleet by 25%, but only decrease the total seating capacity by 15% which may even be made up by the fact the jumbo RJs are being flight planned to fly faster than the small RJs could fly, possibly providing more ASMs in a given year to reduce the loss in capacity.
And I don't have a reason that I can believe in that will keep that trend from continuing in the next contract.
Or put another way, the uneconomical RJs that the company no longer wants are being parked and replaced by new larger more economical RJs that the company wants.
One other way to put it, we agreed to reduce the RJ fleet by 25%, but only decrease the total seating capacity by 15% which may even be made up by the fact the jumbo RJs are being flight planned to fly faster than the small RJs could fly, possibly providing more ASMs in a given year to reduce the loss in capacity.
And I don't have a reason that I can believe in that will keep that trend from continuing in the next contract.
#7635
Can't abide NAI
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
I know you think that the AM Section 40 was violated in spirit. Scope as you define it is all of section 1 where some think it is planes alone.(Section 1 Subpart C) I know there are concerns with the C&BL Article IV Section 2 a and b, but what other concerns are there wrt to precedences being set?
Further, Delta flying is a concern of the Delta pilots. The Delta MEC not being involved is a violation of our MEC Duties in the C&BL.
The precedents are numerous:
- How does ALPA, as an exclusive bargaining agent coordinate if no one knows what is going on?
- How do we prevent other airlines from coming in and doing deals which undercut us, or steal our flying?
- What about the quid pro quo we've always received for these schemes ... flow down protection?
- and I'm tired .... there are probably a hundred scenarios I'm not thinking of.
In my view, we at Delta hold Delta flying. That is our "treasure." The advise and confer language helps us know what is coming and gives us time to defend our turf, or object. Others do not see it that way.
I will let our Reps speak for themselves on why none wish to press this issue. Several have explained their positions to me, but there might could be errors in how I present their case. Also, sometimes I write something after talking to several people and one person thinks "that is not what I told him..."
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 01-21-2013 at 07:47 PM.
#7636
If DPA isn't a factor, why do several people make posts about it. Guess ya'll are worried. Would love to see an in-house union! Do you really think if we left ALPA, ALPA wouldn't take us back if DPA didn't work as planned? All ALPA wants is $. Pure and simple.
#7637
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
They took CAL scabs back.... why wouldn't they take you back? Good job....
#7638
#7639
Line Holder
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
#7640
DPA predication's:
1) if they ever get enough cards to call a vote a large percentage of them will be rendered invalid due to being out of date during the ballot certification.
2) should it ever actually come to an election they will be soundly defeated as most pilots are just sending a message to ALPA.
3) if in the unlikely event they are elected they will produce far less and represent poorly the DAL pilots.
4) they will assess the DAL pilots to cover thier legal fees of last several years
5) with ALPA's future questionable at that point Lee Moak and boys will orchestrate a recall of the DPA leadership, get themselves elected and we'll be right back where we started.
6) it will never get passed #1
1) if they ever get enough cards to call a vote a large percentage of them will be rendered invalid due to being out of date during the ballot certification.
2) should it ever actually come to an election they will be soundly defeated as most pilots are just sending a message to ALPA.
3) if in the unlikely event they are elected they will produce far less and represent poorly the DAL pilots.
4) they will assess the DAL pilots to cover thier legal fees of last several years

5) with ALPA's future questionable at that point Lee Moak and boys will orchestrate a recall of the DPA leadership, get themselves elected and we'll be right back where we started.

6) it will never get passed #1
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM



