Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Delta Pilots Association >

Delta Pilots Association

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta Pilots Association

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:28 PM
  #7631  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

the one thing you have to admit, at some point in time in the last few years 5400 pilots made the effort to sign a membership card and mail it in.
Reply
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:31 PM
  #7632  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
You are correct.

I saw no indication what so ever that the DPA's position on "unity" was any different than ALPA's. What will probably be necessary is for a critical mass of former "RJ Trash" to become voting members at the mainline carriers. Most have been pretty well educated as a result of all the problems they've had on the express level.

I should hasten to add that NO ONE called a meeting on the Pinnacle breach of the Admin Manual and no one objected to the MECs unilateral finding without debate.
Have your Reps discussed this as a group? Have they decided with finality that what the qualified message in the code-a-phone was the end state? How do your Reps take that code-a-phone message?

I know you think that the AM Section 40 was violated in spirit. Scope as you define it is all of section 1 where some think it is planes alone.(Section 1 Subpart C) I know there are concerns with the C&BL Article IV Section 2 a and b, but what other concerns are there wrt to precedences being set?

-First time a enhanced hiring scheme was not codified in our PWA?
- DALPA being silent on the issue allows for a stronger legal precedence being set going forward?
-If it is technically legal wrt to the C&BL and AM what recourse is there to make this a one time event that will limit actions that could hurt this pilot group down the road?
-Is being silent on this issue the best course of action for this group when this deal is ugly and starts the whipsaw of the DCI brand all over again? (Do we really want to codify a the cookie in a bad deal that drops DCI 9E pay by about 20%?)
-I know you want the MEC to defend the AM and C&BL but are there possible issues with doing so that you cannot see?
-Now that the Bridge Agreement is signed and done, what recourse if acceptable from the MEC?
-Have you discussed these actions with your current or incoming reps?

I suspect this will be discussed at length by the reps either officially or unofficially.
Reply
Old 01-21-2013 | 06:32 PM
  #7633  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
the one thing you have to admit, at some point in time in the last few years 5400 pilots made the effort to sign a membership card and mail it in.
Just think of the check and balance that is missing within ALPA.....
Reply
Old 01-21-2013 | 07:14 PM
  #7634  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 369
Likes: 0
From: No to large RJs
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Small RJs might be on the decline but jumbo RJs are on the increase.

Or put another way, the uneconomical RJs that the company no longer wants are being parked and replaced by new larger more economical RJs that the company wants.

One other way to put it, we agreed to reduce the RJ fleet by 25%, but only decrease the total seating capacity by 15% which may even be made up by the fact the jumbo RJs are being flight planned to fly faster than the small RJs could fly, possibly providing more ASMs in a given year to reduce the loss in capacity.

And I don't have a reason that I can believe in that will keep that trend from continuing in the next contract.
Exactly. Rinse and repeat. I feel and share your frustration. Where is Lumberg when you need him to shed a little light on the subject?
Reply
Old 01-21-2013 | 07:35 PM
  #7635  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue24
I know you think that the AM Section 40 was violated in spirit. Scope as you define it is all of section 1 where some think it is planes alone.(Section 1 Subpart C) I know there are concerns with the C&BL Article IV Section 2 a and b, but what other concerns are there wrt to precedences being set?
Section 40 was violated IN FACT. Delta flying is all Delta flying. Pinnacle scopes Delta flying via their Bridge Agreement. It is a black and white clear cut violation of the Admin Manual requirement to inform & coordinate. It affects the other DCI carriers more than it does us, but still, nobody wants ALPA locking our MEC out of negotiations with our management, do we?

Further, Delta flying is a concern of the Delta pilots. The Delta MEC not being involved is a violation of our MEC Duties in the C&BL.

The precedents are numerous:
  • How does ALPA, as an exclusive bargaining agent coordinate if no one knows what is going on?
  • How do we prevent other airlines from coming in and doing deals which undercut us, or steal our flying?
  • What about the quid pro quo we've always received for these schemes ... flow down protection?
  • and I'm tired .... there are probably a hundred scenarios I'm not thinking of.
There is no political support for appropriate action. End of story.

In my view, we at Delta hold Delta flying. That is our "treasure." The advise and confer language helps us know what is coming and gives us time to defend our turf, or object. Others do not see it that way.

I will let our Reps speak for themselves on why none wish to press this issue. Several have explained their positions to me, but there might could be errors in how I present their case. Also, sometimes I write something after talking to several people and one person thinks "that is not what I told him..."

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 01-21-2013 at 07:47 PM.
Reply
Old 01-21-2013 | 08:33 PM
  #7636  
crewdawg52's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 946
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat 744
Default

If DPA isn't a factor, why do several people make posts about it. Guess ya'll are worried. Would love to see an in-house union! Do you really think if we left ALPA, ALPA wouldn't take us back if DPA didn't work as planned? All ALPA wants is $. Pure and simple.
Reply
Old 01-22-2013 | 04:06 AM
  #7637  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg52
If DPA isn't a factor, why do several people make posts about it. Guess ya'll are worried. Would love to see an in-house union! Do you really think if we left ALPA, ALPA wouldn't take us back if DPA didn't work as planned? All ALPA wants is $. Pure and simple.
They took CAL scabs back.... why wouldn't they take you back? Good job....
Reply
Old 01-22-2013 | 04:18 AM
  #7638  
CVG767A's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: 767ER capt
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg52
If DPA isn't a factor, why do several people make posts about it. Guess ya'll are worried.
It looks to me like 3 or 4 guys consider DPA to be a factor. Most of us consider them to be irrelevant.

I'm surprised to hear that they still exist.
Reply
Old 01-22-2013 | 04:36 AM
  #7639  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
the one thing you have to admit, at some point in time in the last few years 5400 pilots made the effort to sign a membership card and mail it in.
I won't be renewing mine.
Reply
Old 01-22-2013 | 04:56 AM
  #7640  
TANSTAAFL's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 784
Likes: 0
From: Still in one
Default

Originally Posted by dalad
I won't be renewing mine.
DPA predication's:

1) if they ever get enough cards to call a vote a large percentage of them will be rendered invalid due to being out of date during the ballot certification.

2) should it ever actually come to an election they will be soundly defeated as most pilots are just sending a message to ALPA.

3) if in the unlikely event they are elected they will produce far less and represent poorly the DAL pilots.

4) they will assess the DAL pilots to cover thier legal fees of last several years

5) with ALPA's future questionable at that point Lee Moak and boys will orchestrate a recall of the DPA leadership, get themselves elected and we'll be right back where we started.

6) it will never get passed #1
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lbell911
Regional
23
04-22-2012 10:33 AM
WatchThis!
Major
68
07-13-2008 08:12 AM
757Driver
Mergers and Acquisitions
190
04-19-2008 11:27 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
RockBottom
Major
5
04-13-2006 05:14 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices