Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Pilots Need to be Screened too >

Pilots Need to be Screened too

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Pilots Need to be Screened too

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2010 | 09:40 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Look at my second statement, then. What does it really accomplish? I'll argue that it is negligble benefit at best.
I DID. I was keying off the first part, where you said "most". I'd hardly rate it at "most". Maybe in the mecca red necka' you're based, but that's hardly the way it is at "most" airports.
Reply
Old 12-02-2010 | 09:57 PM
  #12  
ToiletDuck's Avatar
Che Guevara
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 6,408
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
I hated to say it, but nobody else did. Do you remember Auburn Calloway? He carried a spear gun and a hammer on a Fedex DC-10 and tried to bring it down.
Crash ax and fire extinguishers on every plane. Give me a break.
Reply
Old 12-02-2010 | 10:15 PM
  #13  
80ktsClamp's Avatar
Da Hudge
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 17,473
Likes: 0
From: Poodle Whisperer
Default

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
I DID. I was keying off the first part, where you said "most". I'd hardly rate it at "most". Maybe in the mecca red necka' you're based, but that's hardly the way it is at "most" airports.

You forget that this isn't my first airline...nor is your airline the only airline that exists. Mecca red necka' isnt the only base, either.
Reply
Old 12-02-2010 | 10:52 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,732
Likes: 0
From: DD->DH->RU/XE soon to be EV
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
You forget that this isn't my first airline
Never said it was, did I? But just like you, I'm NOT at my first airline either.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
...nor is your airline the only airline that exists.
Never said it was, did I? NEITHER is yours.

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Mecca red necka' isnt the only base, either.
Agreed. With that, you just helped me prove the point about "most", thanks.

In other words, in case you can't get it, not EVERYBODY does it the same way as you're current/preious employer/domicile. How many domiciles you been in, like 2?

You made a blanket statement with the word "most", I simply disagree.
Reply
Old 12-03-2010 | 12:08 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Crash ax and fire extinguishers on every plane. Give me a break.

besides us controlling the aircraft...this is reason number 2..spot on.

he didnt need a spear gun..he had access to an ax...as we all do.

gimme a break with this screening pilots b.s.! why even let us in the cockpit at all if they cant trust us?
Reply
Old 12-03-2010 | 12:43 AM
  #16  
captnmajic
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I can't believe we're wasting time discussing the topic of screening pilots. Yes, in the past people have slipped through the cracks and done bad things. Let's see, there was David Burke and PSA 1771, and let's not forget Auburn Calloway to name a few failures. In both cases, if simple basic internal control and security been followed, neither incident would have taken place. In the case of PSA 1771, had someone confiscated Burke's ID, just as any company should do when any employee is terminated, that event would not have taken place and 43 people would have more than likely still been alive through at least midnight of December 07, 1987. In the case of Auburn Calloway, FedEx should have NEVER allowed him access to a jumpseat the day before his termination hearing.

No system is perfect, but as Americans we're becoming so accustomed to being taken care of and being assured of 100% safety and security (under the threat of lawsuits lest that not happen) that it's become rather absurd! There are no guarantees in life other than none of us will get out of this alive, period. I am 100% for being as safe and secure as possible, but unfortunately no system is 100% foolproof.

The point I'm trying to make is that pilots are probably the least likely to pose a security threat to the safety of flight. Sure, there's always the exception to the rule, but who's to say that one day an armed LEO or FFDO doesn't go off the deep end and do something bad? Not very likely, but it still could happen. Once pilots have been verified and confirmed as legit through a system such as Crew Pass, then let them through and spend time that would be wasted on screening 99.9999999999% of us on the unknowns that are entering the sterile area of the airport, such as the newly hired ramp workers and aircraft cleaners who are still in the process of being background checked. That's where some of the industries' most serious potential threats are in my opinion.
Reply
Old 12-03-2010 | 12:58 AM
  #17  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by ToiletDuck
Crash ax and fire extinguishers on every plane. Give me a break.
Crash ax, fire extinguishers and don't forget flight controls on every airplane... and some pilots have guns and skip security all together. How's that fair if they can shoot the guy next to them or shoot the guys while sitting on the js?

Nothing says that they can't go crazy too as we all know a braney fife that completed the program along with the former military top gun types.

Maybe nobody should be allowed to get near the cockpit?

Or, when you become a termination or any other type of risk you shouldn't be dequalled immediately and taken out of CASS with several penalties if you try to JS while officially on administrative leave.

Originally Posted by dojetdriver
I DID. I was keying off the first part, where you said "most". I'd hardly rate it at "most". Maybe in the mecca red necka' you're based, but that's hardly the way it is at "most" airports.
Life got you down? Somebody move your cheese? Need a little chicken soup for the soul?

Don't be a hater just because you don't get to take a bus straight to the crew room.
Reply
Old 12-03-2010 | 01:00 AM
  #18  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
I hated to say it, but nobody else did. Do you remember Auburn Calloway? He carried a spear gun and a hammer on a Fedex DC-10 and tried to bring it down. He was vetted and a former Naval officer. All I am saying is that the fact that we might possibly be flying the airplane isn't enough of a reason to let us through unchecked . All of us want to be expedited through, knowing full well that we might not be flying, but jumpseating or deadheading on a ticket. I betcha that the crew of that DC-10 wondered about how a fired pilot could get on their airplane with a spear gun and a hammer.

I know that there are many inconsistencies with the TSA, i.e. rampers going through unchecked, etc.. I'm as against the new scanners and the enhanced gropes as the next guy. However, let's not kid ourselves. Our case to DHS is full of holes, even though it appears that they're buying it. There has to be some level of screening for everyone, rampers, TSA goons, and yes, us.

I don't claim to have the answers, I'm just asking the unanswered question.
Just out of curiosity, in a crew pass location would anyone on principle refuse to use crew pass since pilots should be screened?
Reply
Old 12-03-2010 | 05:19 AM
  #19  
bcrosier's Avatar
Eats shoots and leaves...
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Didactic Synthetic Aviation Experience Provider
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
I hated to say it, but nobody else did. Do you remember Auburn Calloway?

{snip}

Our case to DHS is full of holes, even though it appears that they're buying it. There has to be some level of screening for everyone, rampers, TSA goons, and yes, us.

I don't claim to have the answers, I'm just asking the unanswered question.
This makes slightly less than no sense, for reasons enumerated by other posters.

Honestly, we and real LEO's (not TSA) are the only groups that shouldn't be screened. Others, particularly including rampers and such are exactly who need to be screened. Until the TSA gets a clue, quits putting on a theater production for public view, and addresses real threats I won't take what they have to say seriously.
Reply
Old 12-03-2010 | 05:34 AM
  #20  
captscott26's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 949
Likes: 1
From: A320 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Zapata
I hated to say it, but nobody else did. Do you remember Auburn Calloway? He carried a spear gun and a hammer on a Fedex DC-10 and tried to bring it down. He was vetted and a former Naval officer. All I am saying is that the fact that we might possibly be flying the airplane isn't enough of a reason to let us through unchecked . All of us want to be expedited through, knowing full well that we might not be flying, but jumpseating or deadheading on a ticket. I betcha that the crew of that DC-10 wondered about how a fired pilot could get on their airplane with a spear gun and a hammer.

I know that there are many inconsistencies with the TSA, i.e. rampers going through unchecked, etc.. I'm as against the new scanners and the enhanced gropes as the next guy. However, let's not kid ourselves. Our case to DHS is full of holes, even though it appears that they're buying it. There has to be some level of screening for everyone, rampers, TSA goons, and yes, us.

I don't claim to have the answers, I'm just asking the unanswered question.
That is easily the most rediculous statement I have ever read on this forum. YGTBSM!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
Rocket Man
Major
57
11-06-2009 09:12 PM
Whacker77
Major
70
10-16-2009 06:54 PM
bender
Major
64
07-10-2008 11:20 PM
nw320driver
Major
15
11-17-2006 07:45 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices