Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   The AirTran Pilots' Windfall and SLI (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/55485-airtran-pilots-windfall-sli.html)

AxlF16 12-18-2010 10:59 PM


Originally Posted by ClipperJet (Post 918121)
Then how about a 10-15 year pay fence? Integrate seniority by DOH or relative seniority, but keep the pay rates separate--and at current levels for 15 years or so. (Of course, any future percentage raises/cuts would be applied to the base pay rate for each side.)

That would certainly maintain both sides' "carreer expectations:"

AirTran expectation: 737 Captain at X pay
Southwest expectation: 737 Captain at Y pay

The merits of this idea notwithstanding, does anyone know if the unions can negotiate that sort of thing, or are they only allowed to agree on the list itself?

Hey, that's a great idea! Then all of the future growth can go to the former AT crews at X pay. Maybe even transfer some current SW flying to the AT crews and save a little money? Any newhires can come to the AT side. Why does this sound familiar?:eek:

newKnow 12-18-2010 11:51 PM


Originally Posted by ClipperJet (Post 918121)
Then how about a 10-15 year pay fence? Integrate seniority by DOH or relative seniority, but keep the pay rates separate--and at current levels for 15 years or so. (Of course, any future percentage raises/cuts would be applied to the base pay rate for each side.)

That would certainly maintain both sides' "carreer expectations:"

AirTran expectation: 737 Captain at X pay
Southwest expectation: 737 Captain at Y pay

The merits of this idea notwithstanding, does anyone know if the unions can negotiate that sort of thing, or are they only allowed to agree on the list itself?

They can agree on whatever they want to agree on. But, they can also get sued for whatever they agree on as well. What you propose, if implemented, is prime territory for litigation by the AirTran pilots.

tanker 12-19-2010 03:51 PM


Originally Posted by AxlF16 (Post 918361)
Hey, that's a great idea! Then all of the future growth can go to the former AT crews at X pay. Maybe even transfer some current SW flying to the AT crews and save a little money? Any newhires can come to the AT side. Why does this sound familiar?:eek:

Not going to happen. SWAPA just agreed to SL6. Part of SL6 states that the current ratio of 3.61 to 1 for aircraft between SWA and AirTran must be maintained until the two groups are merged. So if AirTran adds 1 aircraft then 4 have to be added at SWA!

RCD73 12-19-2010 05:45 PM


Originally Posted by tanker (Post 918623)
Not going to happen. SWAPA just agreed to SL6. Part of SL6 states that the current ratio of 3.61 to 1 for aircraft between SWA and AirTran must be maintained until the two groups are merged. So if AirTran adds 1 aircraft then 4 have to be added at SWA!


So ..... The cunning plan is to sacrifice 20% of your growth (aircraft) out of spite ?

Wasn't the original SWAPA quest internal growth ? Now, the plan is to sacrifice 20 % of your internal growth in order to stop 30% of your new pilot workforce the same pay that you fought for in your contract .....

Welcome to USAir, and all of the benefits. Genius and "Culture".

PropPiedmont 12-19-2010 06:24 PM


Originally Posted by tanker (Post 918623)
Not going to happen. SWAPA just agreed to SL6. Part of SL6 states that the current ratio of 3.61 to 1 for aircraft between SWA and AirTran must be maintained until the two groups are merged. So if AirTran adds 1 aircraft then 4 have to be added at SWA!

Tanker,

Check the math on that SL6. Currently SWA has 547 a/c and AT has 138 (3.96 ratio). The 3.61 ratio allows for AirTran to add 13 a/c over the next two years inorder to equal the 3.61 ratio.

True, if AirTran adds 1 a/c SWA will add 3.61, but only after AirTran adds 13 a/c first.

Another way to look at is:

SWA can park 49 airplanes to achieve the 3.61 ratio.

CVG767A 12-19-2010 06:58 PM


Originally Posted by ClipperJet (Post 918121)
Then how about a 10-15 year pay fence? Integrate seniority by DOH or relative seniority, but keep the pay rates separate--and at current levels for 15 years or so. (Of course, any future percentage raises/cuts would be applied to the base pay rate for each side.)

That would certainly maintain both sides' "carreer expectations:"

AirTran expectation: 737 Captain at X pay
Southwest expectation: 737 Captain at Y pay

The merits of this idea notwithstanding, does anyone know if the unions can negotiate that sort of thing, or are they only allowed to agree on the list itself?

At the time of Delta's merger with Western, a Delta L1011 Second Officer earned about the same as a Western DC10 Captain. Pay rates were equalized over a two or three year period, as I recall.

Despite the fact that they got huge raises, many of the Western guys carped about that graduated pay raise until the day they retired. It made for some long trips...

tanker 12-20-2010 06:24 AM

PropPiedmont
SWA can't park the aircraft, here is what SL6 says.
"The ratio of scheduled operational Southwest Airlines aircraft to total AirTran aircraft will not drop below the pre-transaction ratio of 3.61 to 1 (SWA to AirTran) during the period prior to complete pilot integration."
So SL6 counts all AirTran aircraft but only the operational SWA aircraft.

1Seat 1Engine 12-20-2010 08:47 AM


Originally Posted by RCD73 (Post 918664)
So ..... The cunning plan is to sacrifice 20% of your growth (aircraft) out of spite ?

Wasn't the original SWAPA quest internal growth ? Now, the plan is to sacrifice 20 % of your internal growth in order to stop 30% of your new pilot workforce the same pay that you fought for in your contract .....

Welcome to USAir, and all of the benefits. Genius and "Culture".

Wow, you're angry for no apparent reason. I don't think you understand what we're doing here.

We're not sacrificing any growth of any kind, just making sure the company doesn't grow AAI's cheaper work force at the expense of SWA's better compensated workforce during the period that the operations are fenced off from each other.

What's not being said here is that SWAPA also has an agreement with the company that the two operations must be combined within 2 years of closing the deal. The fence must last less than 2 years.

tanker 12-20-2010 09:13 AM


What's not being said here is that SWAPA also has an agreement with the company that the two operations must be combined within 2 years of closing the deal. The fence must last less than 2 years
Unless SWAPA agrees to extend it. Extending the 2 year period won't hurt SWAPA since the 3.61:1 ratio will still be in place.

MatthewAMEL 12-20-2010 11:30 AM

The AirTran CBA shortens the requirement to 18 months.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:29 AM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands