Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
DAL to reduce by 4-5% by 4th Qtr >

DAL to reduce by 4-5% by 4th Qtr

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

DAL to reduce by 4-5% by 4th Qtr

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-17-2011, 04:31 PM
  #71  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer View Post
CVG is locked up, but the DAL percentage has dropped substantially (whether you count all Delta flights or just the mainline ones).
And now that it is locked up, someone please remember to turn out the lights on your way out.
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-17-2011, 04:34 PM
  #72  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NuGuy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,838
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot View Post
To me the answer is simple economics. DAL cannot afford to take on the debt, and or the banks will not allow them to. That is the reason for the effort to cut our debt in almost half in five years. DAL knows it needs feed for the jets they do have (Asia WB flying) but cannot afford to buy the jets to feed it, ala ALK code share.

In reality it is the same everywhere. Once they get down a billion or two more in debt it is my opinion that the ability to buy jets now changes, and we may see some show up, but until then, DAL wants to keep their network intact even if they have less control of it. That is why we see so many code shares, marketing agreements, and alliance partners being added. It also shows that pilot costs are really negligible in the scheme of things.

Meh. As Roseanne Roseannadanna used to say "It's always something"...


Nu

Last edited by NuGuy; 09-17-2011 at 04:44 PM.
NuGuy is offline  
Old 09-17-2011, 05:03 PM
  #73  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy View Post
Meh. As Roseanne Roseannadanna used to say "It's always something"...


Nu
Zactly. We ain't got no big airplanes.. never had no big airplanes.. ain't gonna get no big airplanes.

I hate Florida... just sayin'
tsquare is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 03:08 AM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
Zactly. We ain't got no big airplanes.. never had no big airplanes.. ain't gonna get no big airplanes.

I hate Florida... just sayin'
We still hold delivery positions for something like 30 777's. Sadly we have let the last 10 or so lapse. They require a 18 month confirmation. Delta is happy with its wide body fleet at the moment according to Anderson. The focus is the new interiors on the 767's which from a passenger standpoint will make them brand new. If you have not seen the first one completed its actually perhaps the best interior I have seen on any jet in any fleet.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 03:22 AM
  #75  
Moderator
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B757/767
Posts: 13,088
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
We still hold delivery positions for something like 30 777's. Sadly we have let the last 10 or so lapse. They require a 18 month confirmation. Delta is happy with its wide body fleet at the moment according to Anderson. The focus is the new interiors on the 767's which from a passenger standpoint will make them brand new. If you have not seen the first one completed its actually perhaps the best interior I have seen on any jet in any fleet.
How much life is left in our 767's? I'm sure it's a good amount, I just don't know & am curious. Thanks.
johnso29 is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 04:34 AM
  #76  
Runs with scissors
 
Timbo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2009
Position: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Posts: 7,722
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29 View Post
How much life is left in our 767's? I'm sure it's a good amount, I just don't know & am curious. Thanks.
I think we started getting the first ER's around 1991?

So...if that one is still flying, it's already 20 years old. No matter, I'm sure Richard will find a suitable repalcement...like a 737-1000-ER, with 6 lie-flat seats.
Timbo is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 07:10 AM
  #77  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by FlyZ View Post
^^^^
Wouldn't it be awesome if we had a union committee to investigate all this stuff for us? I mean this is really some digging in the weeds as we try to imagine all the ways they could end-around our scope clause. Or, what if the union employed a law firm to dig into the legalese and think a step ahead of the company?
We do have a strategic planning group with some very good folks manning the positions. However, they don't act autonomously. Politics drive what gets studied, if the results are published and how the results are published. To the extent our union refuses to perform its "homework," it is by design. You are exactly correct that this is the reason management seems to always get the scope relief it "needs."* Management is driven by the numbers, while we're making up false threats & scarecrows. (like Gloopy's DFR theory)

Worse, we write scope with rosy predictions of our future. In reality, scope is tested during periods of economic crises. People make fun of those of us who would like to take a risk management approach to our job protection provisions. IMHO you want Chicken Little ensuring your contract's provisions will be operative if the Sky does Fall!

We are fortunate to have some very smart and experienced people serving in ALPA who can do a pretty good job with "T-LAR" (that looks about right) engineering within the political structure of the union.

The lack of action based on objective analysis was one of the reasons that I considered DPA and still do listen to what TC puts out. Unfortunately, they've taken the worst aspects of ALPA's political head in the sand approach and expanded it to include inaccurate information as a tenet in their political platform. If ALPA is a C student, the DPA never returned from recess and is behind the school house smoking a joint while complaining about the teachers.



* In the past, management ordered jets which exceeded scope limits and were able to get scope liberalized "just in time" to take delivery. This pattern is exactly why the current orders for next generation small mainline jets off the property is highly alarming, despite the denials that these airplanes will be outsourced.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 09-18-2011 at 07:31 AM.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 07:29 AM
  #78  
Can't abide NAI
 
Bucking Bar's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
That's exactly what I'm saying. We have to get it back first, and if a non linear pay and benefits system is the only way to do it then that's what has to be done. There is no moral high ground for anyone to take by acting like doing so would be bad for the profession or unfair to the pilot group when the alternative for not doing so is continued outsourcing which is far, far worse.
Gloopy,

Actually, if you graph out aircraft pay versus productivity the big jets are mostly underpaid relative to their smaller peers. Airlines like GoJets and Colgan fall off the chart at the bottom.

But, what we were told in our last concessionary scope agreement was that management would not operate the jets at mainline regardless of the cost structure. There were other costs involved that outweighed pilot costs. In response, it is my opinion ALPA should treat unity like a religion, or like a Marine treats an injured soldier in the field. Management needs to understand we will not abandon a member. If one pilot has a problem, then 12,000 pilots have a problem and it is going to be YOUR problem in a BIG way.

ALPA needs to get back to our evolutionary roots ... UNITY.

Look at it this way. Humans were about the least likely animal to take over the planet. We lack enough fur to make it through the winter. A house cat has better claws than we do for catching food. It was not until we started using our brains to get along and work together than we stopped running from animals intent on eating us, that we learned to hunt and eat them. Genetically we are hired wired to work together, except for this strange mutation called "pilot."

If we could get unified we would be chasing wooly mammoths off cliffs in no time.
Bucking Bar is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 08:20 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: blueJet
Posts: 4,511
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
If we could get unified we would be chasing wooly mammoths off cliffs in no time.
Unfortunately, some have learned it's less work to just kill a dude and take his mammoth.
Boomer is offline  
Old 09-18-2011, 08:50 AM
  #80  
(retired)
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: Old, retired, healthy, debt-free, liquid
Posts: 422
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar View Post
...Genetically we are hired wired to work together, except for this strange mutation called "pilot."

If we could get unified we would be chasing wooly mammoths off cliffs in no time.
Possibly.

However, with the exception of our large brains which have allowed us to adapt to our surroundings without going through the evolutionary process for physical adaptation, humans aren't much different than other mammalian herd grazers or pack predator species. If you give them enough space, food, and females to fornicate for propagating the species, they aren't going to move an inch or lift a finger (claw, hoof, etc.) except to take a c##p.

Pilots are about comfort and survival. There are pilots who are comfortable and there are those who are not. The center of the herd is comfortable. The very old, weak, very young and periphery individuals are not and have a greater chance of getting picked off.

Unity is a great "rally" word. However, even if the herd is "unified," a number of "edge" individuals are going to get eaten.
Old UCAL CA is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Razor
Cargo
0
02-04-2009 11:53 AM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
10-02-2008 09:45 AM
Past V1
Major
88
07-16-2008 07:28 PM
jetBlueRod
Major
80
06-11-2008 07:27 AM
freightguy
Major
39
12-13-2007 11:59 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices