![]() |
Delta posts $765M profit in 3Q
(This has been discussed a little in "Latest & Greatest...", but I thought it was worthwhile to have a stand-alone thread on this. Although short of analyst expectations of $0.94/share, $0.91/share is darn good given a 42% increase in fuel costs to the company. BTW, Delta is the largest user of jet fuel in the world, according to company executives.)
Delta's Profit, Sales Rise - WSJ.com By SUSAN CAREY Delta Air Lines Inc., lifted by strong revenue performance that helped offset a rising fuel bill, was profitable in the third quarter and expects to be in the black in the current quarter, the company said Tuesday Stripping out a $216 million markdown in the value of its fuel hedges that settle in the future and a $31 million foreign-exchange loss, Delta earned $765 million, or 91 cents a share, in the latest quarter. That missed FastSet's estimate of 94 cents a share, but revenue exceeded expectations, rising 10% to $9.8 million, and the carrier's operating margin was 11%. Shares of Delta were down 4.4% Tuesday in late morning trading on the New York Stock Exchange, trading at $8.51. The Atlanta-based airline, the nation's second-largest by traffic after United Continental Holdings Inc., earned $549 million, or 65 cents a share, including the unusual items. A year ago, including $566 million in one-time items, Delta had a profit of $363 million, or 43 cents a share. Overall costs rose 13% to $8.9 billion, led by a 42% increase in its fuel tab. Richard Anderson, Delta's chief executive, said the company encountered "strong demand, particularly from corporate customers," in the third quarter and expects that to continue in the current quarter. Delta's unit revenue, or the amount taken in for each passenger flown a mile, rose 11% in the third quarter, and was up 10% in October. Ed Bastian, the president, said while growth in demand for flights across the Atlantic is slowing due to economic pressures in Europe, it still is growing. Over the past month, corporate bookings from the banking sector declined 4% from a year ago. But bookings from consulting and business-services clients, a much larger part of Delta's corporate business on transatlantic routes, rose 24% in the past month compared with a year earlier, he said. Meanwhile, revenue from bookings generated in Japan has recovered from pre-earthquake levels. U.S.-originating bookings to Japan still lag by 10% to 15% from levels seen before the quake and tsunami, positioning the airline for "a strong recovery" in Japan in 2012. Delta said it is holding the line on capacity growth and working to wring other costs out of its operations, including retiring older aircraft, consolidating its facilities and reducing employee head count through voluntary departures. The company said it will slice its fourth-quarter capacity by 4% to 5% compared with the year-ago period, but also hopes to hold its unit costs to flat to up 2% compared with the year earlier. For the fourth quarter, Delta expects to product an operating margin of 5% to 7%. For all of 2012, it foresees trimming capacity by 2% to 3% over the seats offered for all of this year. The company ended the quarter with $5.1 billion in cash. Write to Susan Carey at [email protected] |
time to ask the pilot union for some concessions!!! :confused:
|
Congrats Delta. One can only wonder what sort of profit (loss) Delta would have shown without subsidies provided by Alaska Airlines.
|
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074752)
..One can only wonder what sort of profit (loss) Delta would have shown without subsidies provided by Alaska Airlines.
Congrats, beloved partner Alaska, on your record profit and record growth!! |
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074752)
Congrats Delta. One can only wonder what sort of profit (loss) Delta would have shown without subsidies provided by Alaska Airlines.
|
Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
(Post 1074759)
I know!! It's amazing!! Outsourcing to cheaper labor works!!
Congrats, beloved partner Alaska, on your record profit and record growth!! |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1074760)
Probably would have made more money. ;)
|
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074762)
Um....excuse me, but last time I checked Alaska pilots were making a higher hourly wage than Delta pilots on the same piece of equipment. In fact, except for your two or three largest planes at Delta, Alaska pilots are outearning Delta pilots. Please explain the "cheaper" labor costs you referenced to me. I may have been born in a barn, but I wasn't born yesterday!
*hopefully you will have fixed it by then but many pilot groups haven't been able to crack that code. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1074769)
Its cheaper than having to compete. We get that you like this arrangement. But your scope is weaker than ours is and one day you will see what that means.*
*hopefully you will have fixed it by then but many pilot groups haven't been able to crack that code. |
Where is Pineapple guy, the accountant? I want him to tell me again why we shouldn't get big raises? Something about the RASM? How'd we do in Q3 when it came to RASM?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1074773)
I'm not really sure peastain is Alaska btw.
|
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074762)
Um....excuse me, but last time I checked Alaska pilots were making a higher hourly wage than Delta pilots on the same piece of equipment. In fact, except for your two or three largest planes at Delta, Alaska pilots are outearning Delta pilots. Please explain the "cheaper" labor costs you referenced to me. I may have been born in a barn, but I wasn't born yesterday!
|
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074789)
And mine's bigger than yours!!!
|
As a reminder to all, go to "User CP", "Settings & Options", "Edit Ignore List" to add folks who post useless drivel...I just exercised it myself.
|
Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
(Post 1074781)
Where is Pineapple guy, the accountant? I want him to tell me again why we shouldn't get big raises? Something about the RASM? How'd we do in Q3 when it came to RASM?
Airline Financial Data It showed RASM for Delta & Alaska to be about the same, 12-13 cents revenue per available seat mile. Don't know about 3Q though. |
so...record profits and they intend on shrinking.... amazing. I have flown four one ways on Delta in the past 5 weeks and all but one of those 8 flights was 95% full...the other was about 80%......hum...
|
Originally Posted by HercDriver130
(Post 1074810)
so...record profits and they intend on shrinking.... amazing. I have flown four one ways on Delta in the past 5 weeks and all but one of those 8 flights was 95% full...the other was about 80%......hum...
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1074804)
As a reminder to all, go to "User CP", "Settings & Options", "Edit Ignore List" to add folks who post useless drivel...I just exercised it myself.
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1074804)
As a reminder to all, go to "User CP", "Settings & Options", "Edit Ignore List" to add folks who post useless drivel...I just exercised it myself.
|
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074762)
Um....excuse me, but last time I checked Alaska pilots were making a higher hourly wage than Delta pilots on the same piece of equipment. In fact, except for your two or three largest planes at Delta, Alaska pilots are outearning Delta pilots. Please explain the "cheaper" labor costs you referenced to me. I may have been born in a barn, but I wasn't born yesterday!
Please do some research before you post. |
Originally Posted by Readback
(Post 1074831)
What did I tell you!;)
|
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1074842)
No, only if you're rude. Otherwise, have at it, and please post some interesting (accurate) facts or discussion topics that keep it germane & fun. We could all learn something from each other.
|
Originally Posted by Lifeisgood
(Post 1074759)
I know!! It's amazing!! Outsourcing to cheaper labor works!!
|
congrats on the good results,profits are always welcome !!!
|
Originally Posted by Philly
(Post 1074883)
What do the #$@ $@#@ Germans got to do with it?:):D
Stork: Well, what the hell we s'posed to do, you moron? D-Day: War's over, man. Wormer dropped the big one. Bluto: Over? Did you say "over"? Nothing is over until we decide it is! Was it over when the Germans bombed Pearl Harbor? Hell no! Otter: Germans? Boon: Forget it, he's rolling. |
Did they have a conference call with the anal cyst today? If so, did anyone take notes?
|
Originally Posted by peastain
(Post 1074935)
Sorry nerd, didn't happen. The anal cyst was lanced yesterday and is no more.
:D ewwwwwww |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1074962)
With that comment and your screen name.. just... go... away....
ewwwwwww |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1074832)
Alaska pilots wages are not better then Delta. Look at the 1st 4 years of FO pay on the 737 and see who's is higher. It's Delta. Alaska CA's make $177 to Delta's $174 on year 12. FO's are dead even at $119.
Please do some research before you post. http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...0PERSONNEL.htm |
Here is the transcript of the conference call.
Delta Air Lines CEO Discusses Q3 2011 Results - Earnings Call Transcript - Seeking Alpha |
I see that Ed called the DC-9 an "inefficient regional aircraft". I surely hope he is not paving the way to replace any more of them with other regional aircraft, like the E175. Actually, he can, but they will be flown by pilots on OUR SENIORITY LIST!
|
Originally Posted by FlyZ
(Post 1074995)
I see that Ed called the DC-9 an "inefficient regional aircraft". I surely hope he is not paving the way to replace any more of them with other regional aircraft, like the E175. Actually, he can, but they will be flown by pilots on OUR SENIORITY LIST!
Our domestic capacity will down 3% to 5%, as we retire DC-9s, an inefficient regional aircraft. Our Pacific capacity will be flat. The only area of growth for the quarter will be in Latin America, where our capacity will be up 4% to 6% as respond to growing market demand in Central and South America. So we fly regional jets. And DCI flies regional jets. We fly 738s, and we outsource 738s. We fly 777s and 744s, and we outsource 777s and 747s. Like Bar said, Delta Air Lines is making great strides to quit being an airline and just being a ticket brokerage. We have no core competency. |
CNBC "American Greed" on TV right now about Marcus Schrenker taking millions from Delta pilots. Guy looks about 35.
Hard to believe this guy bilked hundreds of pilots. Anyone know the scoop? News Headlines |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1075046)
CNBC "American Greed" on TV right now about Marcus Schrenker taking millions from Delta pilots. Guy looks about 35.
Hard to believe this guy bilked hundreds of pilots. Anyone know the scoop? News Headlines |
Originally Posted by Elvis90
(Post 1074976)
Here is the transcript of the conference call.
Delta Air Lines CEO Discusses Q3 2011 Results - Earnings Call Transcript - Seeking Alpha The transcript may be wrong. When I listened to the webcast this morning I swear I heard "dc-9 AND less efficient regional a/c." |
Originally Posted by hoserpilot
(Post 1075067)
The transcript may be wrong. When I listened to the webcast this morning I swear I heard "dc-9 AND less efficient regional a/c."
|
Originally Posted by FlyZ
(Post 1075075)
Hoser, I bet you're right. That would make more sense in the context, and typically they lump those two together so we don't feel so bad when they park the 9s. Thanks.
I'm just wondering if an MD90 put on a DC9 route, segment by segment (not CASM) is the same cost or cheaper. IOW, even though the 90 has 30ish more seats than the 9, if the total cost to fly the same segment was the same or less on the 90, that would be added capacity (on a 1 for 1 basis) that wouldn't saturate the bottom line as we could always cap the fare buckets to match the 9 and only sell the extra seats in the 90 at the highest bucket only during peak times and/or irop relief. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1075133)
Semi-related note but does anyone have handy the DC9 and MD90 operating costs?
I'm just wondering if an MD90 put on a DC9 route, segment by segment (not CASM) is the same cost or cheaper. IOW, even though the 90 has 30ish more seats than the 9, if the total cost to fly the same segment was the same or less on the 90, that would be added capacity (on a 1 for 1 basis) that wouldn't saturate the bottom line as we could always cap the fare buckets to match the 9 and only sell the extra seats in the 90 at the highest bucket only during peak times and/or irop relief. |
Originally Posted by Clear Right
(Post 1074970)
I have no dog in the Delta vs Alaska debate, however perhaps you should do some research:). According to MIT Alaska pilots average close to $8,000 per year more than Delta. Considering they don't have the wide body folks skewing the scale to the high end, I would say they do quite well. MIT link below:
http://web.mit.edu/airlinedata/www/2...0PERSONNEL.htm Their hourly rates are lower, so they're either flying more days per month or have better rigs. Point was their hourly rates are lower. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1075218)
That's the same guy that says SWA CA's earn $166,000 a year.
He actually states the average pilot salary at SW is 166,000 per year which is a correct number. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands