Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Delta has a TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:23 AM
  #701  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

Sounds like for this one, TA stands for...




.... for me to poop on.
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:26 AM
  #702  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Default

What an absolute embarrassment. How do we start the process of recalling the reps that voted yes, and the negotiating committee?
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:29 AM
  #703  
TeddyKGB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
Default

If you haven't sent in your DPA card yet what are you waiting for?
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:29 AM
  #704  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by TheManager
Unfortunately True.

Word from rep.

4, 8.5,3,3

small increase to dc

35% cut in profit sharing to fund raises

Increases in 76 seat a/c, less overall rj hulls

No comment on jv, or Alaska.

overtime number at 85 hours!!!

I actually am looking forward to going head to head with the sales men in the lounges, forums, etc. This is not insulting, its degrading.

P.S. I forgot!! there is also a ..... wait for it.... promise for 100 seat airframes included, no joke.
Oh my..............
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:31 AM
  #705  
WideRide's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: 7ER A
Default

Originally Posted by caflyer
Here is the take on your TA from United's CEO Smisek.

The guys at the top seem pretty happy with it..





http://www.unitednegotiations.com/em...-to-pilots.pdf

Jeff Smisek
President and Chief Executive Officer

May 21, 2012

Dear Pilots:
I want to thank you for your professionalism, as you provide our customers with safe and reliable air transportation every day.

As I’ve said ever since we merged, my goal is to bring work groups together in a manner that is fair to them and fair to the company. Fairness, in a highly competitive business like commercial aviation, means paying competitively, and receiving in return competitive services so that our customers will want to fly us and our investors will want to invest in us. We need to charge competitive prices for our products, and pay competitive prices for the goods, services and people that we need to run our airline.

I’ve spoken to a large number of you in the cockpit as I have traveled around the system, and I share your desire for a quick resolution to contract negotiations for a joint collective bargaining agreement. Since March 2012, when NMB mediators and the parties established the “small group” negotiating process, we’ve made substantial progress in reducing the number of open issues. We are fast approaching the point that the parties will begin to negotiate the key remaining issues.

I’m sure by now you know that Delta and its pilots’ union recently announced a tentative agreement which, among other things, provides significant pay increases, along with efficiencies for the carrier and scope changes permitting expanded use of larger regional jets. The new Delta TA raises the market pay for commercial airline pilots, and effectively sets a new competitive standard for pilot pay. We will be responsive to the impact of the new Delta TA in our negotiations and will need to adjust our current contract proposal to be competitive with the Delta TA. Our proposal will include significant pay rate increases that are competitive with the new Delta TA, as well as scope and work rules that are competitive with the new Delta TA and permit us to remain competitive in the airline business.

Now is the time for all parties to put aside political differences and posturing, and focus on the remaining open contract items. What I ask of you is that we work together to complete our negotiations promptly.

We’ve been negotiating long enough. Let’s get this done.

Respectfully,

Jeff Smisek
And just how does Smisek know more about our TA than we do? He must be part of the "inner circle":

Old 05-21-2012 | 09:31 AM
  #706  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

The 4,8.5,3,3 pay raises, more 76 seater and less profit sharing rumors can not be true.
The MEC would not have ratified that.

I will wait for the actual language.
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:32 AM
  #707  
exeagle's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: DL
Default

Originally Posted by Delta1067
If you haven't sent in your DPA card yet what are you waiting for?
Good question. It's pretty obvious today that Dalpa is not representing our wishes, if the TA numbers regarding pay and scope are correct.
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:33 AM
  #708  
TeddyKGB's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,673
Likes: 0
From: 7er
Default

Originally Posted by Check Essential
The 4,8.5,3,3 pay raises, more 76 seater and less profit sharing rumors can not be true.
The MEC would not have ratified that.

I will wait for the actual language.
I find it hard to believe also. Hopefully it is just a few tools out there spreading crap. On another topic, is anyone having trouble getting on the DALPA forums?
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:35 AM
  #709  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Just the fact that there is a CUT to our profit sharing tells me the Company has figured out they are going to be making a boat-load of money, soon. That's why THEY wanted to get us locked into this low end deal ASAP, before the earnings numbers started going up, up, up. Can you imagine if we were in negotiations next summer, and they were forcasting $2Billion in profit for 2013?

BTW, I'll have to go look it up, but think there is a tigger in our current profit sharing formula, that gives us a -much bigger- piece of the pie, when earnings go over $1Billion, which would explain why they wanted that 35% reduction, NOW.
Old 05-21-2012 | 09:35 AM
  #710  
Check Essential's Avatar
Works Every Weekend
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,506
Likes: 0
From: 737 ATL
Default

Originally Posted by exeagle
Good question. It's pretty obvious today that Dalpa is not representing our wishes, if the TA numbers regarding pay and scope are correct.
Those numbers are not correct.
DALPA would effectively be voting themselves off the property.
They would not do that.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices