Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

More planes added....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2012 | 04:11 AM
  #41  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
Exactly - Did Delta cry foul a couple years ago when all ASA's ramp functions in ATL were switched over to became Delta's? Or could Delta do it cheaper than the new management (SKW)?

Why did Delta fire 800 Comair (oops, Regional Elite) CVG ramp employees in 2010 and hire 150 extra on the Delta side to make up the difference? They could have fired the Delta side if cost was such an issue.

Why did Delta create Regional Holdings Systems (aka red headed stepchildren) in 2009 then change the name to Regional Elite, combining Comair and Mesaba ramp services into a single Delta subsidiary? Those same guys currently park and service DCI and mainline, makes no difference.

If Regional Elite (owned by Delta) is cheaper than (real) Delta ramp employees, why haven't they taken over ramp operations all across the Delta route structure? Do Delta's ramp employees have "ramp scope" preventing the Delta beancounters from outsourcing their jobs to REAS?

Just reading the words "regional elite" makes my skin crawl and the hair stand up on the back of my neck. As a commuter, when I get to the counter and "regional elite" is working the gate, I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that my commute will NOT be stress free.
Old 06-21-2012 | 04:18 AM
  #42  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

And for maintenance - Delta currently owns a CRJ100/200/700/900/ERJ/EMB-170 MX facility in CVG that can handle 200 aircraft, plus do heavy checks in-house. These FAA-certified mechanics have maintained Delta's DCI aircraft for years.

I'm sure Delta could slap "Delta" patches over their "Comair" patches, let them fly S3 instead of S3C, tell them they get profit sharing, and call it a day.

Delta's 70 CRJs plus Comair's 44 CRJs is way under what they are capable of handling. Or offer a small bonus to have them move to BOS, RDU, MCO, DTW, JFK, or wherever Delta wants to stage their CRJs. Nevermind, they're already there.

Plus, they're already kinda Delta employees.
Old 06-21-2012 | 04:50 AM
  #43  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1
As a commuter, when I get to the counter and "regional elite" is working the gate, I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that my commute will NOT be stress free.
Ewww. Maybe Delta should have called them Honeybadger Elite. If you guys have this reaction, I wonder how our passengers feel?
Old 06-23-2012 | 07:48 PM
  #44  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
I am looking for improvements in many areas, and this TA does that. There's a short duration with a good pay raise for only 3 years. Scope is debatable, but I want those 218 50 seaters gone, sooner. That is key. Total numbers are most important to me. I think the larger RJs will just fill in for the larger amount leaving. Then throw in a favorable ratio, and it works. The international scope is also an improvement. I don't see the 717s coming if the 50s stay longer. Too much capacity (717s+ all of the 50s staying) That makes sense.

Throw in the fact that no other legacy is helping our cause at all, and things are ripe for other interesting "plays" in this industry now, I think this TA is a good deal for us right now. That's why I went from a NO on any deal a month ago to a YES today.
Bill, future 717A avatar guy , would you sign off on this in 2015?
1.B.43.b. “New large widebody aircraft” means a B-777-300 or an A350 added to the Company’s fleet as of [DOS].

1.B.46. “Permitted aircraft type” means:

1.B.46.e. one of up to 102 aircraft configured with 51-70 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“70-seat aircraft”), and

1.B.46.f. one of up to 223 aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“76-seat jets”).

Exception one: If the Company establishes a fleet of new large widebody aircraft, the number of permitted 76-seat aircraft may increase four 76-seat aircraft for each one new large widebody aircraft (4:1.0) ratio (rounded to the next highest integer) up to a total of 287 76-seat aircraft. In the event more than 223 76-seat aircraft are in category A or C operations, then on January 1, 2016, and each succeeding January 1 thereafter, the Company will implement its plan to reduce the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations below Y (the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations as of [DOS]) rounded to the closest integer, as follows:

1) 0.9 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 223),
2) 0.9 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 233),
3) 1.0 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 243),
4) 1.1 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 253),
5) 1.1 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 263).
6) 2.4 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 273), and
7) 5.3 50-seat aircraft for each of the next additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 283).

Note one: Upon the delivery of a 284th76-seat aircraft, the number of permitted 50-seat aircraft will be 0 regardless of the number otherwise provided in Exception one.

Note two: If on January 1, 2017, or any succeeding January 1 thereafter, the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations exceeds the maximum permitted number, the Company will require carriers that engage in category A or C operations to suspend or cease operations on a sufficient number of 50-seat aircraft or 76-seat aircraft to comply with these requirements within 60 days and to remain in compliance thereafter. The Company will be excused from compliance with the provisions of this Note in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is the cause of such non-compliance.
So there you get 16 new B773s and we reduce 50 seaters down to 0 but we raise 76 seaters by 64 aircraft which is less than the increase in TA 2012.

The total DCI fleet would be 389 jets, all 51+ seats, but down from DCI 450.

Sound good?
Old 06-23-2012 | 08:00 PM
  #45  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Bill, future 717A avatar guy , would you sign off on this in 2015?
1.B.43.b. “New large widebody aircraft” means a B-777-300 or an A350 added to the Company’s fleet as of [DOS].

1.B.46. “Permitted aircraft type” means:

1.B.46.e. one of up to 102 aircraft configured with 51-70 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“70-seat aircraft”), and

1.B.46.f. one of up to 223 aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“76-seat jets”).

Exception one: If the Company establishes a fleet of new large widebody aircraft, the number of permitted 76-seat aircraft may increase four 76-seat aircraft for each one new large widebody aircraft (4:1.0) ratio (rounded to the next highest integer) up to a total of 287 76-seat aircraft. In the event more than 223 76-seat aircraft are in category A or C operations, then on January 1, 2016, and each succeeding January 1 thereafter, the Company will implement its plan to reduce the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations below Y (the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations as of [DOS]) rounded to the closest integer, as follows:

1) 0.9 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 223),
2) 0.9 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 233),
3) 1.0 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 243),
4) 1.1 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 253),
5) 1.1 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 263).
6) 2.4 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 273), and
7) 5.3 50-seat aircraft for each of the next additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 283).

Note one: Upon the delivery of a 284th76-seat aircraft, the number of permitted 50-seat aircraft will be 0 regardless of the number otherwise provided in Exception one.

Note two: If on January 1, 2017, or any succeeding January 1 thereafter, the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations exceeds the maximum permitted number, the Company will require carriers that engage in category A or C operations to suspend or cease operations on a sufficient number of 50-seat aircraft or 76-seat aircraft to comply with these requirements within 60 days and to remain in compliance thereafter. The Company will be excused from compliance with the provisions of this Note in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is the cause of such non-compliance.
So there you get 16 new B773s and we reduce 50 seaters down to 0 but we raise 76 seaters by 64 aircraft which is less than the increase in TA 2012.

The total DCI fleet would be 389 jets, all 51+ seats, but down from DCI 450.

Sound good?

Heck yeah! Plus, there had better be 3 Space Shuttles and 4 Sonic Cruisers..... IOW, I would have to see how it would affect the group. The 16 773s would probably just replace the Whales, whereas this TA adds 88 717s and parks hundreds of RJs sooner to facilitate the 717s (leaving RJs allow 717s to take up most of the slack). It would have to be a good deal, like this TA is, for our whole group.
Old 06-23-2012 | 08:24 PM
  #46  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Heck yeah! Plus, there had better be 3 Space Shuttles and 4 Sonic Cruisers..... IOW, I would have to see how it would affect the group. The 16 773s would probably just replace the Whales, whereas this TA adds 88 717s and parks hundreds of RJs sooner to facilitate the 717s (leaving RJs allow 717s to take up most of the slack). It would have to be a good deal, like this TA is, for our whole group.
So would you like to have language in the contract that says the 16 773s have to be growth airplanes?
Old 06-23-2012 | 08:29 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,530
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
So would you like to have language in the contract that says the 16 773s have to be growth airplanes?
Bill simply refuses to educate himself.
Old 06-23-2012 | 08:51 PM
  #48  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Bill, future 717A avatar guy , would you sign off on this in 2015?
1.B.43.b. “New large widebody aircraft” means a B-777-300 or an A350 added to the Company’s fleet as of [DOS].

1.B.46. “Permitted aircraft type” means:

1.B.46.e. one of up to 102 aircraft configured with 51-70 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“70-seat aircraft”), and

1.B.46.f. one of up to 223 aircraft configured with 71-76 passenger seats and certificated in the United States with a maximum gross takeoff weight of 86,000 pounds or less (“76-seat jets”).

Exception one: If the Company establishes a fleet of new large widebody aircraft, the number of permitted 76-seat aircraft may increase four 76-seat aircraft for each one new large widebody aircraft (4:1.0) ratio (rounded to the next highest integer) up to a total of 287 76-seat aircraft. In the event more than 223 76-seat aircraft are in category A or C operations, then on January 1, 2016, and each succeeding January 1 thereafter, the Company will implement its plan to reduce the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations below Y (the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations as of [DOS]) rounded to the closest integer, as follows:

1) 0.9 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 223),
2) 0.9 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 233),
3) 1.0 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 243),
4) 1.1 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 253),
5) 1.1 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 263).
6) 2.4 50-seat aircraft for each of the first additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 273), and
7) 5.3 50-seat aircraft for each of the next additional ten 76-seat aircraft (above 283).

Note one: Upon the delivery of a 284th76-seat aircraft, the number of permitted 50-seat aircraft will be 0 regardless of the number otherwise provided in Exception one.

Note two: If on January 1, 2017, or any succeeding January 1 thereafter, the number of 50-seat aircraft in category A or C operations exceeds the maximum permitted number, the Company will require carriers that engage in category A or C operations to suspend or cease operations on a sufficient number of 50-seat aircraft or 76-seat aircraft to comply with these requirements within 60 days and to remain in compliance thereafter. The Company will be excused from compliance with the provisions of this Note in the event a circumstance over which the Company does not have control is the cause of such non-compliance.

So there you get 16 new B773s and we reduce 50 seaters down to 0 but we raise 76 seaters by 64 aircraft which is less than the increase in TA 2012.

The total DCI fleet would be 389 jets, all 51+ seats, but down from DCI 450.

Sound good?
That TA would be great as long as it included 18.5% over three years, and don't forget to mention the SkyWest C-Series carveout.
Old 06-23-2012 | 08:55 PM
  #49  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Boomer
That TA would be great as long as it included 18.5% over three years, and don't forget to mention the SkyWest C-Series carveout.
We only reward carveouts once the carrier exploits the existing contract.
Old 06-23-2012 | 09:14 PM
  #50  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
We only reward carveouts once the carrier exploits the existing contract.
I know, that's why I said there will be a SkyWest carveout in 2015. And if Moak looks the other way, maybe SKW will finally vote in ALPA.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SaltyDog
Major
46
06-04-2008 09:44 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
6
01-07-2008 01:44 PM
avi8tor4life
Regional
25
01-17-2007 02:30 PM
Freight Dog
Cargo
0
11-17-2005 09:27 PM
Was That For Us?
Major
0
10-20-2005 09:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices