Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
AMR TA allows more large RJ's than Delta >

AMR TA allows more large RJ's than Delta

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

AMR TA allows more large RJ's than Delta

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2012 | 09:50 AM
  #31  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 0
From: B-777 left
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44
There are small cities out there that cannot support mainline. Those cities are not the ones that the 76 seaters are flying to. The 76 seat aircraft are out doing mainline routes. LGA-ORD, DTW-DFW, etc. The ALPA scope notepad left out a lot of important info. For example, under United, it said United allows unlimited 70 seat aircraft. This is simply not true. ALPA put subject to block hour limitations in parenthesis. United is maxed out on its block limitations. I think they only have 120 70 seaters right now and cannot get any more without scope relief. They allow 0 76 seaters. We are going to allow 223 76 seaters and 102 70 seaters. How can this be sold as a win by ALPA on the scope front? I personally do not understand how anyone could vote for this. We will have the worst scope in the industry.
I sure agree with most of this but I bet dal passes it.
Old 06-28-2012 | 10:03 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: DAL
Default

Originally Posted by syd111
I sure agree with most of this but I bet dal passes it.
Such a sense of inevitability is exactly what DALPA's propagandists want us to believe.

I don't think it's a done deal by any means.
Old 06-28-2012 | 10:10 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp

US colored 175s have 79 seats and the 170s have 70.

The CRJ900s were grandfathered from AW's scope which have 86 seats.

Let's get back to the unionoids telling us how much better our TA is than a bankruptcy agreement.
The YV 900s are now configured with 76 seats. Boom. One point me.
Old 06-28-2012 | 10:14 AM
  #34  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp

US colored 175s have 79 seats and the 170s have 70.

The CRJ900s were grandfathered from AW's scope which have 86 seats.

Let's get back to the unionoids telling us how much better our TA is than a bankruptcy agreement.
And wait a second. Think of where AAL came from and how far they fell. Apples to Apples comparison. They had a handful of 70 seaters and a gob of 50 seaters. Now they'll have more "widebody RJs" with more seats than us and still gobs of 50 seaters.

We on the other hand are shrinking our outsourced fleet by 150 airplanes.

Umm...how is this comparable again? And what leverage did they have for the alternative? Yes we really failed. Miserably. Send it back so we can continue to be awesome like AMR.
Old 06-28-2012 | 11:37 AM
  #35  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
Jack,

Admit our TA is better than what they (AA) may have and then move on. UA/CAL is next or they won't get a raise unfortunately. That's how it works when you get feed from small cities. There are plenty of routes out there that can't sustain a mainline plane. On those routes, RJs are probably the right sized plane, and if the routes do well, a mainline plane may be put on it. SWA doesn't go to every small community out there, and actually recently announced closure of 17 Airtran routes. SWA doesn't use smaller community feed like DL does. Bad comparison. Btw, AA got this TA with the APA, not ALPA.
Of course its better. We are 6+ years out of CH11 and making a about 2 bln a year.
Old 06-28-2012 | 11:38 AM
  #36  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
It's hard to hit a homerun when a direct competitor is in BK. Throw in very low pay at UA and US, and it makes it even tougher. Go ahead and discount that, but it's true.
No one expected a home run, but a bunt that got to first and then stole second is not what should be expected either.
Old 06-28-2012 | 11:43 AM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: A big one that looks like a little one
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot

No one expected a home run, but a bunt that got to first and then stole second is not what should be expected either.
Now is this Ricky Henderson stealing 2nd or Prince Fielder? I'm leaning towards the latter. It's that amazing.
Old 06-28-2012 | 11:51 AM
  #38  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
Courtesy of Slowplay

At a current narrowbody fleet count of 497 AMR can operate the following RJ fleet in 2016:

35% up to 65 seaters (CRJ-700 in 2 class) = 174
40% up to 79 seaters (CRJ-900,EMB175,MRJ90) = 199

That's a total of 373 large RJ's allowed. They also get 10% 50 seat turboprops for total outsourcing at current fleet size of 423 aircraft.

Now what if the grow? If they grow the same size as Delta (723) they would be allowed 253 65 seaters and 289 79 seaters plus an additional 72 turboprops.

So which is better?

Up to 289 79 seaters or 223 76 seaters?
Up to 253 CRJ-700 or 102 CRJ-700/EMB-170?

Oh, did you happen to notice their Alaska code sharing is unrestricted now...

Easy for them to allow the ALK code to be "unrestricted" when your CS with them has significant limits on how ALK and AMR can expand their code, and a decent cure period if they opt not to.
Old 06-28-2012 | 01:40 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Default

How many 50 seat jets is American allowed?

Where did you get your numbers?
Old 06-28-2012 | 06:04 PM
  #40  
TheManager's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,503
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Lumberg
The NMB considers them a peer, and that doesn't help when negotiating. Throw in very low rates at UA and bigger RJs at USair, and it doesnt help our cause. Sorry, no way to get around that.
When did we enter mediation??? I've been out of the country and off the grid. Did not know this event had happened.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
Carl Spackler
Mergers and Acquisitions
495
06-28-2008 06:11 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
10
03-28-2006 11:46 AM
geshields
Major
2
08-16-2005 03:00 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices