Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Any Truth to this old TWA fable? >

Any Truth to this old TWA fable?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Any Truth to this old TWA fable?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:13 AM
  #51  
galaxy flyer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,244
Likes: 2
From: Baja Vermont
Default

Bucking Bar

You post great stuff but I gotta call shenanigans on a DL captain being the high time F-14 pilot. Dale Snodgrass with 4,800 hours in the Turkey is widely recognized as the high time guy and retired after 26 years in the USN.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:25 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Huh?

Flying the Concorde for who?

Braniff had a few Concorde pilots running around who ended up with other airlines in the US.

The highest time F14 driver in the World is a Captain at Delta. He worked production flight test for Grumman and used to take off and intercept the Concorde coming across the Atlantic to test the F14's.
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up. In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14. Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:29 AM
  #53  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Bucking Bar

You post great stuff but I gotta call shenanigans on a DL captain being the high time F-14 pilot. Dale Snodgrass with 4,800 hours in the Turkey is widely recognized as the high time guy and retired after 26 years in the USN.
No less a source than our Smithsonian says you are correct.

This gentleman (who's name I am not going to post) flew USN, then went to Grumman where he did production test work on the aircraft coming off the line. I do not recall what he said his TT in T was, but in production test work, flying profiles in every single new airplane as it is built a guy can get a lot of time if the program is moving along. Maybe he was the highest time in some variant and I missed the distinction, maybe the D since that would fit the timeline.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:30 AM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by captjns
Original 767's with F/E panels designed for old United Airlines. They made it to Ansett Airlines of Australia. Talk about a bare overhead panel.

Ansett AN22 Flight Deck 14 June 1987 - YouTube

scroll through the movie to catch the overhead panel and F/E's panel
Delta airlines ordered the 767 with a flight engineer position. We were the one of the few if not the only airline to order the 767 this way. The aircraft started down the production line configured for a FE. Boeing at some point told Delta that they would not build the aircraft with a FE station. Ship 101 was on the line built for the FE. Subsequent airframes the FE station was deleted however they did not move the cockpit bulkhead fwd until the 300 came out. That is why the 200's had the huge cockpit. Ship 101 since it was set up for a FE on the production line was shunted off to a mod line to be reconfigured. Ship 102 became the first 767 delivered to Delta and became the Spirit of Delta instead of ship 101 because of this.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:39 AM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

In the late 60's it was not unusual to see a 27-28 year old DC-9 Capt at TWA, 7 years later they would be lucky to hold 707 F/O.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:40 AM
  #56  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up. In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14. Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time.
Departing from Grumman's facility at Calverton New York, interception of a Mach 2 jet coming straight at Long Island is kinda what the jet was designed to do. For the D model the profile seems to fit, especially when production test flight work and a known Concorde schedule allow for practice getting the separation, break and turning radius / energy solution right. ... and yes, accomplishing the feat did get some attention for the reasons you elaborate on. Seems like a neat test profile which would allow for the efficient test of the aircraft's systems.

I dunno; the fastest I've ever been is in Row 6 of an L1011 with a Captain who was a commuter on the last leg of a four day which had been delayed due to a mechanical. I am certainly not expert enough to question what the man said. I've read even the Super Hornet, while a better all around platform, lacks the fleet defense capabilities (speed, carrying ability without a significant drag penalty, and endurance) of the D model. But again, I'm no expert.

Who would ever believe we used to shoot down satellites with F15's, but we did.

Last edited by Bucking Bar; 05-30-2013 at 07:55 AM.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:41 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Ship 106 was a screaming piece of crap. [DL]
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:57 AM
  #58  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: C560XL/XLS/XLS+
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up. In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14. Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time.
Yup. As one who did quite a few intercepts, I agree. IMPOSSIBLE TO DO.
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 07:57 AM
  #59  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
A F14 could not possibly intercept a Concorde flying at mach 2. It could get in a firing solution but it would never be able to join up.
In addition the distance from the mainland to where the Concorde was running at supersonic speeds would preclude any type of intercept without extensive air refueling assets for the F14.
Supersonic intercepts are very difficult to run to a firing solution and impossible to actually catch and join up with a aircraft at mach 2 plus. Not enough fuel, distance, airspace and time.
Anything could get into a firing solution, especially carrying an AIM-54 - - JUST GET OUT IN FRONT POINTING AT IT!

Of course intercept doesn't nescessarily mean join up in formation - that is just one type of intercept.

Yes - BB seemed to be talking about testing F-14s coming off the production line - but *intercepting* anything didn't require launching from the mainland for the mighty Turkey.

Not sure what you meant about supersonic intercepts being very difficult to run to a firing solution. In what way?
Reply
Old 05-30-2013 | 08:21 AM
  #60  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

OK, found a link to some trials flown officially ...

Originally Posted by Wiki
In British Airways trials in April 1985, Concorde was offered as a target to NATO fighters including F-15 Eagles, F-16 Fighting Falcons, F-14 Tomcats, Mirages, and F-104 Starfighters - but only Lightning XR749, flown by Mike Hale and described by him as "a very hot ship, even for a Lightning", managed to overtake Concorde on a stern conversion intercept.
Now as I understand the story, it too repeat practice, which was probably unofficial (and didn't need to be as long as the stern intercepts maintained lots of separation). The Tomcat would be flown approximately 80 miles lateral separation and the turn would have to be started well before the abeam point at an altitude and bank which allowed the jet to retain the most energy (shallow) then return to New York.

Next time I fly with the gentleman I am going to beg him to write A&S Smithsonian or a similar repository. Seem like an interesting story which might amuse those who say "nah no way."
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Guard Dude
Delta
201736
04-06-2022 06:59 AM
TheManager
Major
9584
07-28-2015 12:15 PM
superduck
Union Talk
420
06-20-2011 10:00 PM
aafurloughee
Major
215
05-10-2011 03:38 AM
jetblaster
Major
74
02-02-2007 06:01 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices