Airline Pilot Central Forums
3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 
Page 7 of 15
Go to

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Major (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/)
-   -   Protect OUR future. Sign the petition now. (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/major/79689-protect-our-future-sign-petition-now.html)

Typhoonpilot 02-15-2014 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1582369)
The govt shutting this fake treaty busting loophole scum bag airline would be the best course of action, preferrably after they've committed to serious long term capital outlays based on flying they won't be able to do. But failing a comprehensive and prompt response from the government, existing airlines need to absolutely crush these dirt bag scum. We can collectively, and very easily and very cheaply cause their total and complete liquidation by barely dipping into the record profit kitty.

Or we can try to get an extra 0.2% YoY and allow these scum bag poachers to metastasize their cancerous little experiment. We have got to put them under.


What State are UAL and DAL incorporated in and do they have mainline, or any, service there?


TP

The Dominican 02-15-2014 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1582480)
So while you salavate over a better schedule or more block hours for your foreign airline, our entire industry and profession could go the way of merchant ships and you'd be fine with that. Got it.

Sorry.....! My schedules are fine and I sure as hell don't want to fly more than the 35 hors/month I'm flying now gloopy, but my question to you is this. How will you stop it? Specially when DAL, UAL, CAL, FDX, UPS are doing it.....!
For example there is a cargo airline in China that is planing a big expansion and they have a lot of economical backing, let's say that they open some routes and offer choices for shipment out of New York to Tokyo (just as an example) you argue that FDX can operate from Beijing and that you can as a Chinese national send a package on FDX from Beijing to Hong Kong, but they can't the other way around? Don't get me wrong I'm not pro anything that will affect the airline industry in the US, but the free use of other countries air spaces by US carriers for so many years will come and bite us on the rear end.

shiznit 02-15-2014 06:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot (Post 1582490)
What State are UAL and DAL incorporated in and do they have mainline, or any, service there?


TP

Delaware, you're so sneaky!:rolleyes:

It's not the same thing and you know it.

It's FAA operating certificate is issued in the United States.
UAL's operations and headquarters are in the United States.
It pays taxes as a US corporation.
UAL operates using employee labor protected by US labor law.

NAS operating certificate is via the IAA in Ireland.
NAS's operations and headquarters are in Norway.
NAS buys aircraft at below market interest rates with US tax dollars.
NAS operates using employee labor from Thailand.
NAS crews are contracted and covered by labor law in Singapore.

ironspud 02-16-2014 04:35 AM

But is this good for us consumers? That is what is most important. Bring the foreigners on!!

captjns 02-16-2014 05:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1582480)
So while you salavate over a better schedule or more block hours for your foreign airline, our entire industry and profession could go the way of merchant ships and you'd be fine with that. Got it.

Isn't up to the Officers and Directors of US carriers to ensure that airlines don't go the way of merchant ships? Don't US carriers have lobbyists on retainer? In addition to writing Congressmen, and Senators, voice your concerns with your company.

Everyone complains about NAI with their 4 aircraft that will destroy the US airline industry. How many of you purchase goods from K-Mart, Walmart, Home Depot, to name a few? Where are there goods manufactured? I don't read anything on this board about abuse in China or Central America, let alone protesting these entities. What kind of car do you drive? Is it a Chevy, or a Ford? Chances are many parts are manufactured overseas too, with cheap labour.

Quote:

NAS buys aircraft at below market interest rates with US tax dollars.
Curious... can someone substantiate this claim?

I've worked in many countries abroad where AOCs were held in countries beyond the boarders of the home country of the airline. To add further confusion, aircraft were registered in different countries too. For example.... Austrian Company with a UK AOC with operations out of Dublin with EI registered aircraft operating to Portugal, Iceland and Canary Islands.

Like the US Delaware offers better tax advantages then many states in the US. Ireland offers investment tax credits to entities that establish operations within their country too.

TeddyKGB 02-16-2014 06:05 AM

Why do I have a bad feeling that the DOT will approve their application? Just as in the case of the pre clearance customs deal in Abu Dhabi, I have no faith in the regulators to do right here. Hope I'm wrong but I'm not holding my breath. Over 10,000 signatures and way way short of where it should be. It's concerning that the majority of US airline pilots are walking around with their heads in the sand.

captjns 02-16-2014 06:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delta1067 (Post 1582764)
Why do I have a bad feeling that the DOT will approve their application? Just as in the case of the pre clearance customs deal in Abu Dhabi, I have no faith in the regulators to do right here. Hope I'm wrong but I'm not holding my breath. Over 10,000 signatures and way way short of where it should be. It's concerning that the majority of US airline pilots are walking around with their heads in the sand.


Way up on the food chain of airline management.

gloopy 02-16-2014 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Dominican (Post 1582493)
Sorry.....! My schedules are fine and I sure as hell don't want to fly more than the 35 hors/month I'm flying now gloopy, but my question to you is this. How will you stop it? Specially when DAL, UAL, CAL, FDX, UPS are doing it.....!
For example there is a cargo airline in China that is planing a big expansion and they have a lot of economical backing, let's say that they open some routes and offer choices for shipment out of New York to Tokyo (just as an example) you argue that FDX can operate from Beijing and that you can as a Chinese national send a package on FDX from Beijing to Hong Kong, but they can't the other way around? Don't get me wrong I'm not pro anything that will affect the airline industry in the US, but the free use of other countries air spaces by US carriers for so many years will come and bite us on the rear end.

I would gladly give up the outdated foreign hub flying all US airlines do in exchange for keeping the flag of convienience cancers off our shore. If that is allowed to grow to its planned manifest destiny, your job, if its even remotely a good one, is in every bit as much jeopardy as ours.

gloopy 02-16-2014 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Typhoonpilot (Post 1582490)
What State are UAL and DAL incorporated in and do they have mainline, or any, service there?


TP

I assume you are referring to Delaware in trying to make your point and play the hypocracy card defending those scab-like scum bags? But I'm not sure how if at all it applies to whatever arguement you're trying to make. They are incorporated in the US, 100% legitimately, and incorporating in one state versus another is 100% an internal US affair that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever, in spirit or intent, on any international or domestic flying they do. But you knew that.

Trying to play that angle would be like worrying about which county in Ireland they were trying to set up shop at. That doesn't matter one bit. If DL/UAL were to incorporate in GA and IL tomorrow, that wouldn't matter in the slightest with any treaty, arrangement or negotiated freedom rights in the slightest.

If you're going to defend those dirt bags just because they are foreign and all things foreign are sublime and superior, you're going to have to do a whole lot better than that.

TeddyKGB 02-16-2014 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gloopy (Post 1583167)
I assume you are referring to Delaware in trying to make your point and play the hypocracy card defending those scab-like scum bags? But I'm not sure how if at all it applies to whatever arguement you're trying to make. They are incorporated in the US, 100% legitimately, and incorporating in one state versus another is 100% an internal US affair that has absolutely no bearing whatsoever, in spirit or intent, on any international or domestic flying they do. But you knew that.

Trying to play that angle would be like worrying about which county in Ireland they were trying to set up shop at. That doesn't matter one bit. If DL/UAL were to incorporate in GA and IL tomorrow, that wouldn't matter in the slightest with any treaty, arrangement or negotiated freedom rights in the slightest.

If you're going to defend those dirt bags just because they are foreign and all things foreign are sublime and superior, you're going to have to do a whole lot better than that.

Yet 4 out of 5 ALPA pilots haven't even bothered to sign the petition. Beyond pathetic !!!!


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:08 PM.
3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11 
Page 7 of 15
Go to


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons

Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands