Your Definition and Personal Interpretation
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
This thread is entertaining to say the least.
It seems that there are a couple of points that need to be separated to clearly understand what everyone is arguing (discussing) for:
1. Does there need to be a better Sh1t filter for the bottom 1-5%? This is a separate topic from promoting a merit based system.
2. The current seniority system is 100 years old, and therefore needs to be changed. Merit based? Merit based how? Rank the pilots 1-8,000? The best F/O gets to upgrade first, and then join a seniority based group of Captains? Would a merit based system be part of discussion point #1 to keep the weak pilots at the bottom, and act as a sh!t filter, or is it part of the instant-gratification generation that needs to be Captain now. I got it, certainly after 4+ years in the right seat; you are fully qualified, groomed, and ready for the upgrade – let alone with another several years to go. Just keep in mind, after you’ve been there 20 years, new blood with 4 years experience will join the ranks fully groomed and qualified for the upgrade – the back edge of that sword is very sharp.
3. Comparing pilots to Corporate America does not work. Groups of management/accountants/finance/legal/etc… all with a diverse set of skills and talents all climbing toward top management positions. Pilots are a highly skilled set of standardized labor – very different than corporate America. In corporate America, great and unique ideas are re-warded. In aviation – well, when was that last time you hear a pilot say “watch this, I’ve got an idea I want to try.” Probably need to look to the trades as an example for a different way of doing things – start off as an apprentice, then journey man, and ultimately master.
4. 25 year Capt hits the streets after a company goes bankrupt – certainly shouldn’t sit right seat at the bottom, nobody will argue that. The only way to combat that is to accept the fact that new bodies can be hired into your company ahead of you – everybody will argue that.
It seems that there are a couple of points that need to be separated to clearly understand what everyone is arguing (discussing) for:
1. Does there need to be a better Sh1t filter for the bottom 1-5%? This is a separate topic from promoting a merit based system.
2. The current seniority system is 100 years old, and therefore needs to be changed. Merit based? Merit based how? Rank the pilots 1-8,000? The best F/O gets to upgrade first, and then join a seniority based group of Captains? Would a merit based system be part of discussion point #1 to keep the weak pilots at the bottom, and act as a sh!t filter, or is it part of the instant-gratification generation that needs to be Captain now. I got it, certainly after 4+ years in the right seat; you are fully qualified, groomed, and ready for the upgrade – let alone with another several years to go. Just keep in mind, after you’ve been there 20 years, new blood with 4 years experience will join the ranks fully groomed and qualified for the upgrade – the back edge of that sword is very sharp.
3. Comparing pilots to Corporate America does not work. Groups of management/accountants/finance/legal/etc… all with a diverse set of skills and talents all climbing toward top management positions. Pilots are a highly skilled set of standardized labor – very different than corporate America. In corporate America, great and unique ideas are re-warded. In aviation – well, when was that last time you hear a pilot say “watch this, I’ve got an idea I want to try.” Probably need to look to the trades as an example for a different way of doing things – start off as an apprentice, then journey man, and ultimately master.
4. 25 year Capt hits the streets after a company goes bankrupt – certainly shouldn’t sit right seat at the bottom, nobody will argue that. The only way to combat that is to accept the fact that new bodies can be hired into your company ahead of you – everybody will argue that.
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,305
Likes: 249
Originally Posted by gearjerk
You use two recent examples of accident investigation to stereotype an airline process/procedure that has been effective for the majority of the recent century?
I've been on multiple Safety Investigation/Accident Investigation Board's in the Air Force; one accident involving a fatality. If the culmination of our Board's findings resulted in classifying accidents and the process of seniority as you have, I guarantee you the president of our investigation would've been fired by the General he was briefing.
You attack the seniority progression of the airlines, with weak arguments about how it has resulted in two recent accidents. Don't you think it's slightly a small scope of material? And then offer the idea that the Corporate world does it better through the "merit" system. I would offer the "merit" system (a.k.a. a$$kissing), is even more dangerous than the process we have now. I know for a fact that the corporate environments I've witnessed, and those that have disregarded their own integrity to a$$kiss the boss were lesser individuals, and therefore less competent to be an effective leader (e.g. PIC) than someone whose had a "bad day or two" in the simulator.
Again, referring to the SIB/AIB's. Anyone can have a bad day, on any given day. I guarantee you will too! The fact that it doesn't result in an investigable accident, doesn't mean that you are so much superior to someone else with your piloting prowess, it means that the process in place now, WORKS and the statistics (i.e. your material to lambast the system) will remain limited, at best.
I've been on multiple Safety Investigation/Accident Investigation Board's in the Air Force; one accident involving a fatality. If the culmination of our Board's findings resulted in classifying accidents and the process of seniority as you have, I guarantee you the president of our investigation would've been fired by the General he was briefing.
You attack the seniority progression of the airlines, with weak arguments about how it has resulted in two recent accidents. Don't you think it's slightly a small scope of material? And then offer the idea that the Corporate world does it better through the "merit" system. I would offer the "merit" system (a.k.a. a$$kissing), is even more dangerous than the process we have now. I know for a fact that the corporate environments I've witnessed, and those that have disregarded their own integrity to a$$kiss the boss were lesser individuals, and therefore less competent to be an effective leader (e.g. PIC) than someone whose had a "bad day or two" in the simulator.
Again, referring to the SIB/AIB's. Anyone can have a bad day, on any given day. I guarantee you will too! The fact that it doesn't result in an investigable accident, doesn't mean that you are so much superior to someone else with your piloting prowess, it means that the process in place now, WORKS and the statistics (i.e. your material to lambast the system) will remain limited, at best.
How ironic anyway. Who gets called for interviews at the legacies? I don't see anyone getting cold-calls at Delta, United, and American. You can have stellar qualifications and never hear a peep. Meanwhile people of far lesser qualifications get called because, again, the terms used above 'ass-kissing' , 'favoritism' , 'squadrons' , 'universities' are used to get buddies through the doors. So that is okay and works to get a pilot through the door and hired but not when on the line?
#33
Meanwhile people of far lesser qualifications get called because, again, the terms used above 'ass-kissing' , 'favoritism' , 'squadrons' , 'universities' are used to get buddies through the doors. So that is okay and works to get a pilot through the door and hired but not when on the line?
GJ
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,305
Likes: 249
No, my app hasn't been updated in along time. In fact it should be expired because I only did the free app because didn't want to pay the $55 fee.
#35
Runs with scissors
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
#36
#38
It used to be "merit-based" at a lot of U.S. airlines. And Emirates pilots have to INTERVIEW for a captain's seat.
Everyone who chooses this profession knows about seniority.
#39
How many of you that are against seniority have worked in a pt 135 or corporate flt dept? Lots of ass kissing, rule breaking to get upgrades, days off, the best trips, etc. Can you imagine the cronyism that could/would happen in a large operation such as AA, UAL, SWA or DAL? Depending who the DO or chief pilot is the upgrades would be based on squadrons, universities etc. We are Ll required to meet a set standard. Not all are able to make the upgrade. The seniority system is the only way to do it.
#40
Line Holder
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 49
Why does this not surprise me. Gulf Stream, pinnacle, and virgin. Salivating over cabatoge by govt financed airlines and now giddy over the Norwegian type scheme to use flags of convenience. I'm sure you would just as much relish a strike at a Delta, AA, UAL or SWA type airline to get where you want.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




