Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
NAI blocked by House Amendment >

NAI blocked by House Amendment

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

NAI blocked by House Amendment

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-10-2014, 12:46 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default NAI blocked by House Amendment

For those of you always bagging ALPA, this is potentially a huge win for all of us. It just needs to get through the Senate.

U.S. Lawmakers Move to Block Norwegian Air Expansion Plan - WSJ

"The U.S. House of Representatives on Monday passed an amendment to the proposed Department of Transportation budget request intended to block Norwegian's application."
Grumble is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 01:13 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
EWRflyr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: 737 CAPT
Posts: 1,882
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
For those of you always bagging ALPA, this is potentially a huge win for all of us. It just needs to get through the Senate.

U.S. Lawmakers Move to Block Norwegian Air Expansion Plan - WSJ

"The U.S. House of Representatives on Monday passed an amendment to the proposed Department of Transportation budget request intended to block Norwegian's application."
To be clear, the amendment has been added to a funding appropriations bill which must first pass the House, then pass the Senate OR survive as part of the Conference Committee compromise, then be signed by the president OR override the veto if one happens.

This is just a small step and we need to keep the pressure on.

Support the PAC!
EWRflyr is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 04:05 PM
  #3  
No longer cares
 
tsquare's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 767er Captain
Posts: 12,109
Default Hey Mods!

Can we merge all these threads?
tsquare is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 04:57 PM
  #4  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

I think many on here need a refresher on Schoolhouse Rock's "Im just a bill."

An amendment added to an unresolved House resolution....we have a long way to go...
The Juice is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 06:32 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

I think many on here need a refresher on Schoolhouse Rock's "Im just a bill."

An amendment added to an unresolved House resolution....we have a long way to go...
While true, it's attached to the DOT funding and the amendment was passed unanimously. You think DOT is going to slug it out over NAIs application when their bankroll is on the line?
Grumble is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 07:09 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Sniper's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,001
Default

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
While true, it's attached to the DOT funding and the amendment was passed unanimously.
A unanimous voice vote isn't the same thing as a 435-0 vote.

Originally Posted by Grumble View Post
You think DOT is going to slug it out over NAIs application when their bankroll is on the line?
NAI will, as will Boeing (Illinois, South Carolina, Washington, Missouri, and Kansas all are home to major Boeing sub-assemblies). They're spending a TON of $ on this - just look at how many 'pro-NAI' editorials have been published. Setting up (greasing palms) those shell-companies in Ireland wasn't cheap either.
Sniper is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 07:21 PM
  #7  
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
 
The Juice's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Default

I think many on here need a refresher on Schoolhouse Rock's "Im just a bill."

An amendment added to an unresolved House resolution....we have a long way to go...
While true, it's attached to the DOT funding and the amendment was passed unanimously. You think DOT is going to slug it out over NAIs application when their bankroll is on the line?
It passed unanimously with a "voice vote" as are the majority of amendments added on to a bill. It's how everyone can add their bits and pieces to a bill. 44 amendments were added to this bill, 11 by unanimous vote. House Amendment 807 (NAI amendment) was one of the 44 to be added to 4745

I don't think the DOT cares about the amendment at all because they want their money for 2015. 4745 has many things in it, and House Amendment could be removed at any time during the process. So no, the DOT won't fight it, as it is not their fight to begin with, it's NAI and their lobbyists

I applaud ALPAs effort in this fight, and support it 100%. I however felt their FastRead was a bit "murky" on the details on what actually happened in the House, evident with all of the postings about "NAI being dead"

I hope it continues to gain support to defeat NAIs application. However much can still happen between passing the House, Senate, conference committee, and Obama. Who knows what NAI might spend to lobby to get that amendment tossed out in conference? It would be chopped out in a second with a back room deal and all is for nothing. I hope it doesn't happen, but this is Congress we are talking about.

As a side, some interesting parts of HR 4745. These are the "laws" our elected officials are working on:

(Sec. 152) Bars the use of funds for Amtrak to pay overtime costs in excess of $35,000 for any Amtrak employee.

(Sec. 115) Prohibits the obligation of funds for an FAA employee to purchase a store gift card or gift certificate through use of a government-issued credit card.

...and my favorite...

(Sec. 413) Prohibits the use of funds under this Act for first-class airline accommodations in contravention of specified federal regulations.
The Juice is offline  
Old 06-10-2014, 10:19 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

You'd be amazed what people have used their govt charge card for... Cars, hookers, etc. I can't believe they're just now putting that down.

As for amtrak, should've been allowed to die decades ago.
Grumble is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 04:57 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by The Juice View Post
...and my favorite...

(Sec. 413) Prohibits the use of funds under this Act for first-class airline accommodations in contravention of specified federal regulations.
So, if passed, it would outlaw the already illegal purchase of illegal first class tickets in cases where current law makes it already illegal.

Unless they violate that too, in which case we can pass another law to uphold the already existing law...
gloopy is offline  
Old 06-11-2014, 05:34 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beaver Hunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 294
Default

We have to vote them all out.
Beaver Hunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Busboy
Cargo
110
09-18-2007 05:41 PM
vagabond
Hangar Talk
14
04-25-2007 09:09 AM
SWAjet
Major
15
10-16-2005 03:27 PM
Gordon C
Major
0
06-25-2005 06:44 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices