NAI's Temporary Exemption Denied!
#11
Moderator
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Just like if they let NAS operate the 787s, but then that scum bag Kjos couldn't offer $150 fares(Baseline...wait for the total once the fees get tacked on)or destroy the US airline industry. Just like he did to the US Maritime Industry.
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
If scum like their kind ever do make it in this country, it will be 100% our fault for allowing it, and the one time 2.5 billion "return to shareholders" will be viewed as our Waterloo.
#14
New Hire
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Let me first start off by saying that I am in fact a NAS 737 pilot. I am also a proud member of bALPA (uk Alpa)
Background:
I initially agreed with the ALPA campaign to deny NAI. I personally didn't like the fact that NAI was basing all of the 787 pilots in Bangkok working under a Singaporean law. I too saw this as a way for the NAI to prevent any form of union participation from its pilots. The 787 pilots apparently didn't seem to mind this to much themselfs on the grounds that they would much rather be paying Singaporian income taxes rather then the Scandinavia equvulant.
The latest developments are that Norwegian is going to be basing its 787 pilots in LGW effective in a month or two time. This will in-turn also necessitate UK employment contracts.
I personally see this as a victory for alpa. The offshore contracts/ social dumping situation will be a thing of the past.
This is however not new news; ALPA must have been aware of this.
So why continue to fight for denial of NAI?
ALPA has achieved its goal, right?
Background:
I initially agreed with the ALPA campaign to deny NAI. I personally didn't like the fact that NAI was basing all of the 787 pilots in Bangkok working under a Singaporean law. I too saw this as a way for the NAI to prevent any form of union participation from its pilots. The 787 pilots apparently didn't seem to mind this to much themselfs on the grounds that they would much rather be paying Singaporian income taxes rather then the Scandinavia equvulant.
The latest developments are that Norwegian is going to be basing its 787 pilots in LGW effective in a month or two time. This will in-turn also necessitate UK employment contracts.
I personally see this as a victory for alpa. The offshore contracts/ social dumping situation will be a thing of the past.
This is however not new news; ALPA must have been aware of this.
So why continue to fight for denial of NAI?
ALPA has achieved its goal, right?
#15
Not necessarily. Once the pressure is off of managment, what's to stop them from trying some other nefarious idea. Best to set precedence and get a final and permanent ban. That way it's codified in Federal law.
#16
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,836
Likes: 175
From: window seat
Let me first start off by saying that I am in fact a NAS 737 pilot. I am also a proud member of bALPA (uk Alpa)
Background:
I initially agreed with the ALPA campaign to deny NAI. I personally didn't like the fact that NAI was basing all of the 787 pilots in Bangkok working under a Singaporean law. I too saw this as a way for the NAI to prevent any form of union participation from its pilots. The 787 pilots apparently didn't seem to mind this to much themselfs on the grounds that they would much rather be paying Singaporian income taxes rather then the Scandinavia equvulant.
The latest developments are that Norwegian is going to be basing its 787 pilots in LGW effective in a month or two time. This will in-turn also necessitate UK employment contracts.
I personally see this as a victory for alpa. The offshore contracts/ social dumping situation will be a thing of the past.
This is however not new news; ALPA must have been aware of this.
So why continue to fight for denial of NAI?
ALPA has achieved its goal, right?
Background:
I initially agreed with the ALPA campaign to deny NAI. I personally didn't like the fact that NAI was basing all of the 787 pilots in Bangkok working under a Singaporean law. I too saw this as a way for the NAI to prevent any form of union participation from its pilots. The 787 pilots apparently didn't seem to mind this to much themselfs on the grounds that they would much rather be paying Singaporian income taxes rather then the Scandinavia equvulant.
The latest developments are that Norwegian is going to be basing its 787 pilots in LGW effective in a month or two time. This will in-turn also necessitate UK employment contracts.
I personally see this as a victory for alpa. The offshore contracts/ social dumping situation will be a thing of the past.
This is however not new news; ALPA must have been aware of this.
So why continue to fight for denial of NAI?
ALPA has achieved its goal, right?
#18
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,488
Likes: 0
From: tri current
I heard a great definition of hatred the other day, "Hatred is like drinking poison hoping the other guy dies."
TP
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,232
Likes: 62
From: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Perhaps you should look at your leadership and your management for not your preconceived notion of some form of protectionism. I just don't get this entitlement mentality.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



