Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Hogan Personality FAIL >

Hogan Personality FAIL

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Hogan Personality FAIL

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2014 | 08:39 PM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,501
Likes: 511
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
These tests HAVE to go. Along with HR having a say in the hiring process. Should be pilots only. Because when that cockpit door is closed, the same things happen behind those closed doors no matter what paint job is on the side of the airplane. Sharing lots of laughs, laughing at the guard police, and running checklists. We are never "ourselves" when we have to answer tmaat questions wearing a tight suit. We are ourselves when we are doing what we do best. Flying and having a good time.
I'd disagree. Because with that definition, 99.9% of pilots would say that they are great to fly with. No fly lists wouldn't exist. HR is there to weed people out. Wearing a suit and answering TMAAT makes you outside your comfort zone of a flight deck and that's what it is all about. If you just put somebody in a sim and that was all then almost all would be hired based on that. But being a pilot is not just about stick/rudder skills. Today, the people part is important in terms of getting along with others, helping out, being a team player, etc.
Reply
Old 10-14-2014 | 10:52 PM
  #62  
Nopac's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: 320A
Default

When I interviewed for the job, the advice that I received before taking the MMPI was: "As you ponder the correct answer, you should think of yourself as a combination of Neil Armstrong and Ritchie Cunningham" I like to think that it worked.
More likely, they had probably run out of better qualified applicants...
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 03:30 AM
  #63  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
I'd disagree. Because with that definition, 99.9% of pilots would say that they are great to fly with. No fly lists wouldn't exist. HR is there to weed people out. Wearing a suit and answering TMAAT makes you outside your comfort zone of a flight deck and that's what it is all about. If you just put somebody in a sim and that was all then almost all would be hired based on that. But being a pilot is not just about stick/rudder skills. Today, the people part is important in terms of getting along with others, helping out, being a team player, etc.
No $hit. Which is why charter pilots should get first dibs on airline interviews. Flying is only 10% of what we do daily. And I still get about 600 hrs per year. I will try not to smirk when I'm asked in a 121 interview what I've done for customer service or gone the extra mile. *wink.*
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 04:37 AM
  #64  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by km1619
I think these airlines should pick up the techniques that ADM Rickover (father of the United States Nuclear Navy) used back in the day to interview new officers going into the nuke Navy.

"When interviewing candidates for the nuclear navy, Rickover would, in order to throw them off and test them, seat them in chairs with shortened front legs and at the same time position them so that the sunlight streamed through specially adjusted venetian blinds straight into their eyes. That way “they had to maintain their wits,” he explained, “while they were sliding off the chair" "

The airlines have spent many, many man hours and decades un-doing what was done when "military ways" were brought to commercial aviation. I'm speaking of CRM/TEM. So, no. The "military way" has it's place but it's not in commercial cockpits.
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 04:40 AM
  #65  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 4,153
Likes: 341
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
No $hit. Which is why charter pilots should get first dibs on airline interviews. Flying is only 10% of what we do daily. And I still get about 600 hrs per year. I will try not to smirk when I'm asked in a 121 interview what I've done for customer service or gone the extra mile. *wink.*
100% agree. Just keep in mind, you're fighting "the machine". Those in charge of hiring now are mostly former ex-mil guys, especially at certain airlines (SWA, AA, FedEx, no clue on DAL).

A successful 135 or 91 pilot would make a hell of a good airline guy.
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 08:07 AM
  #66  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 9,501
Likes: 511
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
No $hit. Which is why charter pilots should get first dibs on airline interviews. Flying is only 10% of what we do daily. And I still get about 600 hrs per year. I will try not to smirk when I'm asked in a 121 interview what I've done for customer service or gone the extra mile. *wink.*
First dibs on an interview is arguable. You'll hear different opinions from military pilots, pilots within that major's regional partners, pilots at LCCs, etc. I won't touch this one. *wink*
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 09:17 AM
  #67  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by Name User
100% agree. Just keep in mind, you're fighting "the machine". Those in charge of hiring now are mostly former ex-mil guys, especially at certain airlines (SWA, AA, FedEx, no clue on DAL).

A successful 135 or 91 pilot would make a hell of a good airline guy.
From a flying stand point yes, but can he also follow orders, good or bad, even if he thinks the guy who gave him the order is a complete tool? Can he keep his mouth shut, salute smartly and carry on?

That's why the airlines like to hire military guys, they know they will do what they are told....usually.
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 09:29 AM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy
First dibs on an interview is arguable. You'll hear different opinions from military pilots, pilots within that major's regional partners, pilots at LCCs, etc. I won't touch this one. *wink*
Yes. It is arguable. Don't forget we have tons of military pilots in 135. I'm talking about them as well having the upper hand in hiring over a direct entry pilot mill kid or someone like that.
Reply
Old 10-15-2014 | 09:50 AM
  #69  
Timbo's Avatar
Runs with scissors
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 7,847
Likes: 0
From: Going to hell in a bucket, but enjoying the ride .
Default

Originally Posted by Learflyer
Yes. It is arguable. Don't forget we have tons of military pilots in 135. I'm talking about them as well having the upper hand in hiring over a direct entry pilot mill kid or someone like that.
P.S. I was a Part 135 guy (Lear 23 and AC690) prior to joining the military. It took them nearly two years to beat the independent thought and common sense out of me! But I did learn how to salute!
Reply
Old 10-20-2014 | 07:59 AM
  #70  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
From: B737
Default

I know they say one can re-apply 1 year after a TBNT reply following a fail on the Hogan. Anyone actually getting a second chance to take this thing some time later?...

Last edited by CrucifiedwX78; 10-20-2014 at 08:29 AM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Oscar13601
Technical
6
01-02-2012 05:19 AM
CentralPa717
Technical
5
04-08-2011 06:19 PM
jens
Flight Schools and Training
5
04-02-2011 02:02 PM
NotTooBad
Major
70
02-08-2008 09:07 AM
EIGHTMENOUT1
Cargo
3
01-13-2006 11:36 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices