Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Slap on the wrist or life in prison? >

Slap on the wrist or life in prison?

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Slap on the wrist or life in prison?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-23-2014 | 08:51 AM
  #11  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Was it as a sting?
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:02 AM
  #12  
sandlapper223's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: More Drag
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
We are far less likely to have someone from our ranks attempt something like this. Not saying it will never happen, but most of us have more vested in a long term career than the rampers and other employees.

Stories like this are always the rampers. We had some in SLC that were doing the same gig as this guy only it was transporting heroin to Oakland. That was about 5 years ago. In my mind it is just plain crazy that these employees are not screened. Can't figure out how the TSA thinks that is OK.
All employees with access to the sterile area are required to undergo a 10-year criminal history and background check. The same one we as pilots had to go through. Problem is, an employee who becomes criminal, or engages in criminal activity after they are hired. Often, many airport employees who otherwise would not commit a crime, are recruited or coerced into this by associates they meet or are introduced to. The people they hang out with in their personal lives is the problem.

Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.

Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:26 AM
  #13  
LNL76's Avatar
Junior Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 1
From: Whiskey Papa
Default

Originally Posted by sandlapper223
All employees with access to the sterile area are required to undergo a 10-year criminal history and background check. The same one we as pilots had to go through. Problem is, an employee who becomes criminal, or engages in criminal activity after they are hired. Often, many airport employees who otherwise would not commit a crime, are recruited or coerced into this by associates they meet or are introduced to. The people they hang out with in their personal lives is the problem.

Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.

Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
I agree, especially with your last line. How about they go through TSA screening when showing up for work like everyone else? I don't think that's too much to ask and we'd all be safer for it.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:39 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76
How about they go through TSA screening when showing up for work like everyone else? I don't think that's too much to ask and we'd all be safer for it.
Why? KCM is considered TSA screening.

The issue I have with baggage handlers is they are most often not screened, period, when accessing their work areas. That is unless they happen to get selected for a random screening, which is rarely, if ever. The issue with baggage handlers is that as a rule, they have the least invested in their "career" compared to pilots, for example. About seven years ago, at one large airline hub, which won't be named here, I was told by an immigrations officer that there had been a round up of nearly 30 baggage handlers who had been accessing the ramp (without screening I might add) for nearly 30 days before it was discovered that at least 30 baggage handlers weren't even in the country legally. They had been working in a sterile area, yet their "background checks" were still in the process of being run while they had full and unrestricted access to much of the airport, as well as airplanes. It's time for loopholes like this to be closed IMMEDIATELY, if not sooner!
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 09:46 AM
  #15  
sandlapper223's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 447
Likes: 0
From: More Drag
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76
I agree, especially with your last line. How about they go through TSA screening when showing up for work like everyone else? I don't think that's too much to ask and we'd all be safer for it.
TSA originally tried that. But what with airlines and passengers complaining about long screening times, and employees late for work, the TSA changed some requirements (for non-traveling employees). These vary from airport to airport, of course. Balance between economy and risk I guess.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 10:04 AM
  #16  
LNL76's Avatar
Junior Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 1
From: Whiskey Papa
Default

Originally Posted by jamesrhatcher
Why? KCM is considered TSA screening.

The issue I have with baggage handlers is they are most often not screened, period, when accessing their work areas. That is unless they happen to get selected for a random screening, which is rarely, if ever. The issue with baggage handlers is that as a rule, they have the least invested in their "career" compared to pilots, for example. About seven years ago, at one large airline hub, which won't be named here, I was told by an immigrations officer that there had been a round up of nearly 30 baggage handlers who had been accessing the ramp (without screening I might add) for nearly 30 days before it was discovered that at least 30 baggage handlers weren't even in the country legally. They had been working in a sterile area, yet their "background checks" were still in the process of being run while they had full and unrestricted access to much of the airport, as well as airplanes. It's time for loopholes like this to be closed IMMEDIATELY, if not sooner!
Ummm, I was referring to baggage handlers NOT going through TSA. Not sure what you thought I was referring to. It's ludicrous and security theatre to have crewmembers who put their butts on a plane to get patted down and sometimes harrassed in front of regular pax while others who never leave the ground slip through a side door.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 10:05 AM
  #17  
LNL76's Avatar
Junior Senior
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,851
Likes: 1
From: Whiskey Papa
Default

Originally Posted by sandlapper223
TSA originally tried that. But what with airlines and passengers complaining about long screening times, and employees late for work, the TSA changed some requirements (for non-traveling employees). These vary from airport to airport, of course. Balance between economy and risk I guess.
Tough darts...if lines are too long, create a separate screening area for them. Pax would be outraged if they knew this loophole.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 10:32 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76
Tough darts...if lines are too long, create a separate screening area for them. Pax would be outraged if they knew this loophole.
They do now Faux just got a hold of it.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 10:44 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by sandlapper223
All employees with access to the sterile area are required to undergo a 10-year criminal history and background check. The same one we as pilots had to go through. Problem is, an employee who becomes criminal, or engages in criminal activity after they are hired. Often, many airport employees who otherwise would not commit a crime, are recruited or coerced into this by associates they meet or are introduced to. The people they hang out with in their personal lives is the problem.

Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.

Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
There have already been very violent acts.
Reply
Old 12-23-2014 | 11:29 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: It's still a Guppy, just a bit longer.
Default

Originally Posted by RockyBoy
We are far less likely to have someone from our ranks attempt something like this. Not saying it will never happen, but most of us have more vested in a long term career than the rampers and other employees.

Stories like this are always the rampers. We had some in SLC that were doing the same gig as this guy only it was transporting heroin to Oakland. That was about 5 years ago. In my mind it is just plain crazy that these employees are not screened. Can't figure out how the TSA thinks that is OK.
Not disagreeing with you, but let's not forget the jumpseating FedEx pilot who went bananas on the flight crew with an axe some years back.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetnfast
Major
12
11-26-2014 08:51 AM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
5
02-21-2007 08:01 PM
Linebacker35
Military
2
02-08-2007 03:59 PM
UConnQB14
Regional
100
07-10-2006 12:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices