Slap on the wrist or life in prison?
#12
We are far less likely to have someone from our ranks attempt something like this. Not saying it will never happen, but most of us have more vested in a long term career than the rampers and other employees.
Stories like this are always the rampers. We had some in SLC that were doing the same gig as this guy only it was transporting heroin to Oakland. That was about 5 years ago. In my mind it is just plain crazy that these employees are not screened. Can't figure out how the TSA thinks that is OK.
Stories like this are always the rampers. We had some in SLC that were doing the same gig as this guy only it was transporting heroin to Oakland. That was about 5 years ago. In my mind it is just plain crazy that these employees are not screened. Can't figure out how the TSA thinks that is OK.
Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.
Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
#13
All employees with access to the sterile area are required to undergo a 10-year criminal history and background check. The same one we as pilots had to go through. Problem is, an employee who becomes criminal, or engages in criminal activity after they are hired. Often, many airport employees who otherwise would not commit a crime, are recruited or coerced into this by associates they meet or are introduced to. The people they hang out with in their personal lives is the problem.
Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.
Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.
Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 148
Likes: 0
The issue I have with baggage handlers is they are most often not screened, period, when accessing their work areas. That is unless they happen to get selected for a random screening, which is rarely, if ever. The issue with baggage handlers is that as a rule, they have the least invested in their "career" compared to pilots, for example. About seven years ago, at one large airline hub, which won't be named here, I was told by an immigrations officer that there had been a round up of nearly 30 baggage handlers who had been accessing the ramp (without screening I might add) for nearly 30 days before it was discovered that at least 30 baggage handlers weren't even in the country legally. They had been working in a sterile area, yet their "background checks" were still in the process of being run while they had full and unrestricted access to much of the airport, as well as airplanes. It's time for loopholes like this to be closed IMMEDIATELY, if not sooner!
#15
TSA originally tried that. But what with airlines and passengers complaining about long screening times, and employees late for work, the TSA changed some requirements (for non-traveling employees). These vary from airport to airport, of course. Balance between economy and risk I guess.
#16
Why? KCM is considered TSA screening.
The issue I have with baggage handlers is they are most often not screened, period, when accessing their work areas. That is unless they happen to get selected for a random screening, which is rarely, if ever. The issue with baggage handlers is that as a rule, they have the least invested in their "career" compared to pilots, for example. About seven years ago, at one large airline hub, which won't be named here, I was told by an immigrations officer that there had been a round up of nearly 30 baggage handlers who had been accessing the ramp (without screening I might add) for nearly 30 days before it was discovered that at least 30 baggage handlers weren't even in the country legally. They had been working in a sterile area, yet their "background checks" were still in the process of being run while they had full and unrestricted access to much of the airport, as well as airplanes. It's time for loopholes like this to be closed IMMEDIATELY, if not sooner!
The issue I have with baggage handlers is they are most often not screened, period, when accessing their work areas. That is unless they happen to get selected for a random screening, which is rarely, if ever. The issue with baggage handlers is that as a rule, they have the least invested in their "career" compared to pilots, for example. About seven years ago, at one large airline hub, which won't be named here, I was told by an immigrations officer that there had been a round up of nearly 30 baggage handlers who had been accessing the ramp (without screening I might add) for nearly 30 days before it was discovered that at least 30 baggage handlers weren't even in the country legally. They had been working in a sterile area, yet their "background checks" were still in the process of being run while they had full and unrestricted access to much of the airport, as well as airplanes. It's time for loopholes like this to be closed IMMEDIATELY, if not sooner!
#17
TSA originally tried that. But what with airlines and passengers complaining about long screening times, and employees late for work, the TSA changed some requirements (for non-traveling employees). These vary from airport to airport, of course. Balance between economy and risk I guess.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 5,816
Likes: 5
From: retired 767(dl)
#19
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
All employees with access to the sterile area are required to undergo a 10-year criminal history and background check. The same one we as pilots had to go through. Problem is, an employee who becomes criminal, or engages in criminal activity after they are hired. Often, many airport employees who otherwise would not commit a crime, are recruited or coerced into this by associates they meet or are introduced to. The people they hang out with in their personal lives is the problem.
Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.
Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
Bottom line: Hire people for sensitive duties that are of sound mind and who are dependable and trustworthy. Not easy with these wages.
Unfortunately, it will take a horrible violent act before anyone notices or takes action to correct it.
#20
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 727
Likes: 0
From: It's still a Guppy, just a bit longer.
We are far less likely to have someone from our ranks attempt something like this. Not saying it will never happen, but most of us have more vested in a long term career than the rampers and other employees.
Stories like this are always the rampers. We had some in SLC that were doing the same gig as this guy only it was transporting heroin to Oakland. That was about 5 years ago. In my mind it is just plain crazy that these employees are not screened. Can't figure out how the TSA thinks that is OK.
Stories like this are always the rampers. We had some in SLC that were doing the same gig as this guy only it was transporting heroin to Oakland. That was about 5 years ago. In my mind it is just plain crazy that these employees are not screened. Can't figure out how the TSA thinks that is OK.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




