Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
The Emirates Advantage… Not just subsidies >

The Emirates Advantage… Not just subsidies

Search
Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

The Emirates Advantage… Not just subsidies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-23-2015, 12:14 AM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Skyone's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: B777 Left
Posts: 736
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
He stopped blaming Bush? News to me.
Well finally we have found some common ground.
Skyone is offline  
Old 04-23-2015, 09:03 AM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Whip Whitaker View Post
Regulators could note, for example, the recent behavior of Delta which, having been given the Seattle-Haneda route on a basis that locked out competitors, blatantly abandoned the service.
LOLwut?

First of all, the regulators already looked at that and apparently didn't think it was that big of a deal. Because it wasn't. Getting one slot at an oddball time (due to Japanese protectionism, which you claim to be opposed to) and then suspending service during the low season isn't abnormal at all. At. All.

And that was before the hub was as built up (and growing) as it is now, and full time service looks like it'll happen, although realistic relief will obviously need to be granted on the definition of full time because as of now 2 cancellations in a row for WX or MX might count as a "service suspension" which is flat out ridiculous.

DL is suspending SVO service too the last few months of the year because of a massive dropoff in demand. I suppose EK should start dumping 380's on that too.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-23-2015, 09:10 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by MikeF16 View Post
The US government doesn't think long term and is led by a man who makes Chamberlain look like Genghis Khan. On one hand we have a (currently) profitable airline industry and on the other a dire need to use Al-Dhafra Air Base, UAE ports, and UAE airspace. The US government will not mess with open skies and risk angering the UAE. Even Bush kowtowed to the oil monarchies, Obama is worse (for different reasons). I expect no relief from the US government, I hope I am wrong.
They are both foreign oil lackeys. One holds their hands like a child and the other bows deeply to them. No difference. However, the current admin has been incredibly hostile to sunni rulers, even the relatively secular ones. Its borderline scorched earth, and the emerati are surrounded in it. They have to know the next "Arab spring" is always right around the corner. They are the ones with a dire, desperate, pathetically codependent need for our perpetual babysitting services. If they tried their lame tantrum on us that they tried on Canada, they'd be in a world of hurt. They have zero leverage. None.
gloopy is offline  
Old 04-24-2015, 05:52 AM
  #134  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: B777 Captain
Posts: 93
Default

Okay, so I'm not that great at dissecting theses things and I didn't read the entire 1000 page report but could anyone direct me to where in the report was the so-called "smoking gun" regarding Emirates? What I could find was a few vanilla balance sheet statements for 1996-1999 (?) that had nothing that I could find and then a 1 paragraph statement that said "it's out there" (I'm paraphrasing). In reading the White Paper, I assumed that there would certainly be SOME justification for the charges leveled.

If that's all they've got, disingenuous doesn't even begin to cover it. It would appear that the strategy here is to use the subsidies of Etihad and Qatar (I'm still assuming that there is at least some substance in those claims but given what's not in there on Emirates, that may not be a fair assumption!) to hammer Emirates which IS the biggest commercial threat to the US3 (which may work because it is a country to country dispute).

Gloopy, perhaps you could cite the evidence (other than just saying it's there because I said so). Seriously, that's it?
Gillegan is offline  
Old 04-24-2015, 06:49 AM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
DL is suspending SVO service too the last few months of the year because of a massive dropoff in demand. I suppose EK should start dumping 380's on that too.
I am sure they will when they get Vlad to finance them with even cheaper oil and no landing fees. The sheiks do speak the same language as Putin does ya know. (F America at every opportunity in case you didn't know)
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 04-24-2015, 09:19 AM
  #136  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Posts: 474
Default

Originally Posted by Gillegan View Post
Okay, so I'm not that great at dissecting theses things and I didn't read the entire 1000 page report but could anyone direct me to where in the report was the so-called "smoking gun" regarding Emirates? What I could find was a few vanilla balance sheet statements for 1996-1999 (?) that had nothing that I could find and then a 1 paragraph statement that said "it's out there" (I'm paraphrasing). In reading the White Paper, I assumed that there would certainly be SOME justification for the charges leveled.

If that's all they've got, disingenuous doesn't even begin to cover it. It would appear that the strategy here is to use the subsidies of Etihad and Qatar (I'm still assuming that there is at least some substance in those claims but given what's not in there on Emirates, that may not be a fair assumption!) to hammer Emirates which IS the biggest commercial threat to the US3 (which may work because it is a country to country dispute).

Gloopy, perhaps you could cite the evidence (other than just saying it's there because I said so). Seriously, that's it?
There's not going to be much in the 1000 pages because Emirates is the "more transparent" (for lack of a better term) of the Big ME3. Apparently for the other two airlines, they had to piece together information from multiple, varied sources and that's what the 1000 pages represents. The case against Emirates is largely publicly available (severely discounted landing fees at shiny new airports, fuel hedge subsidies, Dubai Inc business dealings, etc.) so therefore not in the 1000 pages. For example, when the government took over a few billion bucks in fuel hedging contracts for Emirates, the transfer of the contracts was noted in Emirates' financial disclosures and footnoted in the original whitepaper, and therefore would likely not be within the 1000 pages. Not sure how that is disingenuous?
globalexpress is offline  
Old 04-24-2015, 06:28 PM
  #137  
The Brown Dot +1
 
scambo1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2009
Position: 777B
Posts: 7,775
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
I am sure they will when they get Vlad to finance them with even cheaper oil and no landing fees. The sheiks do speak the same language as Putin does ya know. (F America at every opportunity in case you didn't know)
Russia is tanking.
scambo1 is offline  
Old 04-25-2015, 10:04 AM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,184
Default

Originally Posted by scambo1 View Post
Russia is tanking.
Of course it is, but the point is that M R Rats will lobby for more subsidies to show the world just how wonderful they are. Since both Putin and the sheiks hate America, it's a win/win.
BenderRodriguez is offline  
Old 04-25-2015, 10:41 AM
  #139  
Line Holder
 
Whip Whitaker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: MD-80 Captain
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
Of course it is, but the point is that M R Rats will lobby for more subsidies to show the world just how wonderful they are. Since both Putin and the sheiks hate America, it's a win/win.
Bender, do you even bother to comprehend what you write before you post? The Sheiks hate America? Really?

In the UAE, the United States has a quiet, potent ally nicknamed ?Little Sparta? - The Washington Post
Whip Whitaker is offline  
Old 04-25-2015, 10:57 AM
  #140  
Straight QOL, homie
 
Purple Drank's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2012
Position: Record-Shattering Profit Facilitator
Posts: 4,202
Default

Originally Posted by BenderRodriguez View Post
Of course it is, but the point is that M R Rats
There's only one guy here who uses that term

Originally Posted by tsquare View Post
You're kidding, right? But then again, Etihad and M R Rats
Purple Drank is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dune
Foreign
33
12-14-2011 03:41 PM
vagabond
Foreign
12
11-19-2011 03:43 AM
joel payne
Foreign
48
11-19-2009 04:28 PM
Past V1
Foreign
5
06-16-2008 02:20 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
0
02-21-2007 10:26 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices