Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT
#101
Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
"Sitting here in Europe I can tell you that is simply not true, Europe does not hate Norwegian. I have yet to meet a pilot here who hates their operation and based on the passenger growth and awards, passengers like them too."
Really? I've heard nothing but anger about NAI from crew. Passengers do like cheap though, no denying that.
"Sitting here in Europe I can tell you that is simply not true, Europe does not hate Norwegian. I have yet to meet a pilot here who hates their operation and based on the passenger growth and awards, passengers like them too."
Really? I've heard nothing but anger about NAI from crew. Passengers do like cheap though, no denying that.
#102
But furthermore, Norway is covered in the Open Skies treaty, and is a member of the EEA.
If you want to really get down to it, the treaty says that airlines cannot use provisions of the treaty to undermine labour standards. They have not done that. At worst you can claim they used provisions of the EEA to undermine labor standards. But the EEA and Open Skies treaty are two different things and the US DOT has nothing to do with internal EEA matters. Norway is covered under the Open Skies treaty, Ireland is also covered under the Open Skies treaty. No provisions of the treaty have been abused by Norwegian.
#103
Since I work for a European airline, and have several friends and neighbors that work for other European airlines, I think it is a safe bet that I know and interact with far more European flight crews than you. Not one person, not one, has ever said anything disparaging against Norwegian.
#104
To a RyanAir FO like pilot Maria, I'm sure NAI looks like the next great adventure to post about on her Instagram account. I worked a trip with a guy originally from Norway earlier this year that goes back there frequently. Chatting with an SAS crew before departure, he got an earful of their disdain for all things Kjos on his last trip home.
#106
On Reserve
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
#107
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.
Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.
An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,762
Likes: 113
From: 1900D CA
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Judging by your unintelligent response, I'd say you're least likely to understand economics. I'm not talking econometrics or graduate level economics...I'm talking basic stuff. Economic principles or intro to microeconomics or macroeconomics. Please feel free to advance an evidence based argument, as there are some good ones to be made.
To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.
Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.
An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.
Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.
An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
#110
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 77
Judging by your unintelligent response, I'd say you're least likely to understand economics. I'm not talking econometrics or graduate level economics...I'm talking basic stuff. Economic principles or intro to microeconomics or macroeconomics. Please feel free to advance an evidence based argument, as there are some good ones to be made.
To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.
Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.
An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.
Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.
An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



