Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major
Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT >

Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT

Search

Notices
Major Legacy, National, and LCC

Deny NAI failed, given final approval by DOT

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-04-2016 | 07:13 AM
  #101  
NEDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rolf
Originally Posted by NEDude View Post
"Sitting here in Europe I can tell you that is simply not true, Europe does not hate Norwegian. I have yet to meet a pilot here who hates their operation and based on the passenger growth and awards, passengers like them too."

Really? I've heard nothing but anger about NAI from crew. Passengers do like cheap though, no denying that.
Since I work for a European airline, and have several friends and neighbors that work for other European airlines, I think it is a safe bet that I know and interact with far more European flight crews than you. Not one person, not one, has ever said anything disparaging against Norwegian.
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 07:18 AM
  #102  
NEDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by cal73
But it's not an Irish airline. It's a Norwegian airline. And Norway is not an EU member. So that argument isn't valid.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NAI is an Irish airline. Its AOC is issued in Ireland.

But furthermore, Norway is covered in the Open Skies treaty, and is a member of the EEA.

If you want to really get down to it, the treaty says that airlines cannot use provisions of the treaty to undermine labour standards. They have not done that. At worst you can claim they used provisions of the EEA to undermine labor standards. But the EEA and Open Skies treaty are two different things and the US DOT has nothing to do with internal EEA matters. Norway is covered under the Open Skies treaty, Ireland is also covered under the Open Skies treaty. No provisions of the treaty have been abused by Norwegian.
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 07:27 AM
  #103  
CousinEddie's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 8
Default

Originally Posted by NEDude
Since I work for a European airline, and have several friends and neighbors that work for other European airlines, I think it is a safe bet that I know and interact with far more European flight crews than you. Not one person, not one, has ever said anything disparaging against Norwegian.
To a RyanAir FO like pilot Maria, I'm sure NAI looks like the next great adventure to post about on her Instagram account. I worked a trip with a guy originally from Norway earlier this year that goes back there frequently. Chatting with an SAS crew before departure, he got an earful of their disdain for all things Kjos on his last trip home.
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 07:41 AM
  #104  
NEDude's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,067
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CousinEddie
To a RyanAir FO like pilot Maria, I'm sure NAI looks like the next great adventure to post about on her Instagram account. I worked a trip with a guy originally from Norway earlier this year that goes back there frequently. Chatting with an SAS crew before departure, he got an earful of their disdain for all things Kjos on his last trip home.
And some pilots for American used to complain about all things Herb Kelleher at one point. Some Delta pilots used to complain about all things David Neeleman. Some Alaska and United pilots used to complain about all things Richard Branson. Of course they are going to complain about the new guy. But that does not mean that the pilots view it as a bad career option or view the other pilots with disdain. Like I said the other day, I have a neighbor who is an A330/340 captain for SAS and is leaving to go to Norwegian.
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 07:55 AM
  #105  
CousinEddie's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 8
Default

It doesn't bother you, great. Nor do the contents of the article I posted highlighting the sad state of affairs over there. If you had been around in the 80s, I'm sure you would have defended Lorenzo as well.
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 08:04 AM
  #106  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by NMuir
Nice to see someone else around here who understand economics!
Looking through your post history, I'd say you are the least likely to be able to understand economics. You are a bumbling fool and should focus on getting from 250tt to 500tt
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 08:28 AM
  #107  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by typeunkwn
Looking through your post history, I'd say you are the least likely to be able to understand economics. You are a bumbling fool and should focus on getting from 250tt to 500tt
Judging by your unintelligent response, I'd say you're least likely to understand economics. I'm not talking econometrics or graduate level economics...I'm talking basic stuff. Economic principles or intro to microeconomics or macroeconomics. Please feel free to advance an evidence based argument, as there are some good ones to be made.

To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.

Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.

An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 09:00 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 3,762
Likes: 113
From: 1900D CA
Default

Hilltopper, you are aware that United's MEC does not speak for, or represent all of ALPA, right? And, are you blaming Hillary Clinton for Norwegian Air getting approval?
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 09:03 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,459
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by DFWAviatior
Judging by your unintelligent response, I'd say you're least likely to understand economics. I'm not talking econometrics or graduate level economics...I'm talking basic stuff. Economic principles or intro to microeconomics or macroeconomics. Please feel free to advance an evidence based argument, as there are some good ones to be made.

To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.

Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.

An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
Insightful & intelligent posts DFW. Trying to wrap my head around it. What you've contributed to this thread in helpful. Thanks.
Reply
Old 12-04-2016 | 09:15 AM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,578
Likes: 77
Default

Originally Posted by DFWAviatior
Judging by your unintelligent response, I'd say you're least likely to understand economics. I'm not talking econometrics or graduate level economics...I'm talking basic stuff. Economic principles or intro to microeconomics or macroeconomics. Please feel free to advance an evidence based argument, as there are some good ones to be made.

To those talking about unions determining "economic worth" that can't be further from the truth. As someone previously posted, buyers (demand) set the price. How can we on the sellers (supply) side influence our worth (wages)? We could reinstate the age 60 retirement rule and wipe out a huge chunk of available pilots. We could limit the number of ATP licenses allowed each year. We could increase the standards of a 1st class medical certificate (BMI limit, strict blood pressure limits etc.). These options are likely unappealing to most in our profession.

Again, I'd love a strong, protected industry full of high paying jobs. At some point we need to sit back and be realistic about the world we live in and the economic situation that exists.

An administration will not "save an industry" nor will protectionist policies (read about the Jones Act and the Maritime Industry).
This isn't a reason to stop the fight for fair competition. America is a huge aviation market, you want to fly to America? Then play by the same rules as American airlines, no government subsidies, no shady out sourcing international agencies. If you just sit back and relax then you almost guarantee that America won't be able to compete in their own market. Why would you sit back on this? It is fight worth fighting.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PilotGR
United
40
04-18-2016 01:20 PM
jdt30
United
60
12-09-2014 11:15 PM
Starcheck102
Major
9
08-21-2014 05:44 AM
Flyby1206
Major
2
05-19-2007 03:26 AM
BEWELCH
Flight Schools and Training
43
03-21-2007 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices