FAA MEDX site down
#11
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,681
Likes: 0
I believe that the predictive capability of the medical process is practically zero. We all know of Olympic athletes in the prime of life who have died of sudden cardiac issues or strokes. I can also think of more than a couple of pilots who have lost their medical certification-yet led very active and full lives for many decades past that point, and who would have been totally capable of operating a pressurized airliner with no problem.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
#13
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
We're all ticking time bombs since the day we're born. For some of us it goes off when you are young and healthy, for others it goes off when you're a chain smoker and live until 100.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#14
I believe that the predictive capability of the medical process is practically zero. We all know of Olympic athletes in the prime of life who have died of sudden cardiac issues or strokes. I can also think of more than a couple of pilots who have lost their medical certification-yet led very active and full lives for many decades past that point, and who would have been totally capable of operating a pressurized airliner with no problem.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
#15
Prime Minister/Moderator

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,200
Likes: 814
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
I believe that the predictive capability of the medical process is practically zero. We all know of Olympic athletes in the prime of life who have died of sudden cardiac issues or strokes. I can also think of more than a couple of pilots who have lost their medical certification-yet led very active and full lives for many decades past that point, and who would have been totally capable of operating a pressurized airliner with no problem.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
Although we're not pulling G's, age, health, circadian disruption, long days, and high cabin altitude all can add up to significant stress...and that's before anything goes wrong.
There are other things which could be done to improve statistical pilot reliability, but the FAA would hit a political road-block if they tried BMI or cholesterol screening as this would discriminate against obsese people, who are virtually a protected class in this country.
Just because you know somebody who lived to a ripe old age with a particular disorder does not mean that disorder doesn't have a statistical relevance.
#18
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: Port Bus
#19
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 564
Likes: 7
I believe that the predictive capability of the medical process is practically zero. We all know of Olympic athletes in the prime of life who have died of sudden cardiac issues or strokes. I can also think of more than a couple of pilots who have lost their medical certification-yet led very active and full lives for many decades past that point, and who would have been totally capable of operating a pressurized airliner with no problem.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
The system is a hold-over from the military, where pilots used to operate in a single pilot environment which introduced a great many environmental risks. Modern airliners share absolutely nothing with that environment.
I'm no Dr, but I just don't see the point of our system-at all. I would better understand and agree if it had better predictive capability, but it is pretty much useless, expensive nonsense which protects no one.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




