Search

Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

Hearing Transcripts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2008 | 06:56 AM
  #81  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Then I ask one question Carl. Why did NWA convert the 744's from long term leases to short term leases. There is a reason for that, and better short term rates are not the answer.
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:04 AM
  #82  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
Then I ask one question Carl. Why did NWA convert the 744's from long term leases to short term leases. There is a reason for that, and better short term rates are not the answer.
Oh darn. If ACL says it's not because of cheaper short term rates, then it must be true.

Just got word that the MD-88's are getting fitted with drop tanks and will be used to replace the 747-400. Still working on how not to clobber the fishing boats with drop tanks.

Carl
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:12 AM
  #83  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
If you look at the original delivery dates of NWA's 787's and the CSAM, it is ever apparent that they were 400 replacements. There arrivals coincide with 400 checks that get quite expensive.
the original plan was for the 787 to replace the 400s and the 400s to replace the 200s. but there would be more 787s in the long run.
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:19 AM
  #84  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

And as we have argued to death. The 787's are way late. The 742's are DOA, and the 744's will have to bridge the gap, but will be gone in the next few years.
The 88 are being fitted with Wi-Fi. That will keep them profitable for the remainder of the fleet plan.
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:21 AM
  #85  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Short term rates are higher. Long term rates offer better interest rates, but high penalties for early outs. In essence if keeping an airplane until another one arrives the short term lease is cheaper than the long term one for that very reason.
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:29 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
From: A330 capt
Default

Originally Posted by Nosmo King
Nope, I say delete the 767-400 from the fence language then all the stuff in the fence is at 2 payrates instead of 3.
Well, I say nwa has 3 aircraft under fence as does dal and in roughly equal numbers: nwa-1)747-400 2)747-200 3) 787 future deliveries (approx. 28 a/c on property, 18 on firm order=46 total. dal-1) 777 2)767-400 3) 777LR future deliveries (31 a/c on property, 8-12 on firm order)=39 to 43 total. I say keep it that way, otherwise you'll end up with nwa fenced off from 121 widebodies at the combined company. (777,767-400,767-300, future 777LR)
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:35 AM
  #87  
Superpilot92's Avatar
Underboob King
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 0
From: Guppy Commander
Default

Originally Posted by acl65pilot
And as we have argued to death. The 787's are way late. The 742's are DOA, and the 744's will have to bridge the gap, but will be gone in the next few years.
The 88 are being fitted with Wi-Fi. That will keep them profitable for the remainder of the fleet plan.
Wi-Fi will make the 88's profitable? Come on ACL that was weak How about the DC9s are paid for and with oil going down that only makes the dc9s more viable and are great aircraft for filling the much needed gap in the DAL network while also helping to replace 50 seat feed.
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 07:44 AM
  #88  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Weak but it shows a commitment to the fleet Super.

The 9's can be replaced by RJ's. CSAM is cheaper as has been pointed out on the large RJ's
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 08:01 AM
  #89  
satchip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,350
Likes: 0
From: Flying the SEC
Default

The 9s are also approaching their manufacturer's life time cycle limits. Airplanes have a finite lifespan. The 9s will reach their end before any other aircraft in our combined fleet (except maybe the -200 whales). What in your scope prevented half your 9 fleet from disappearing with no mainline replacement? What in your scope clause prevented NW from replacing that flying with Newco aka Compass? Dude there are alot of RJs out there and those routes are taylor made for RJs. I hate it, you hate it, we all hate it but that doesn't change the facts. Those airplanes are gone by 2012, maybe sooner if you listen to your soon to be former CEO Dougie boy.

I'll wager a twelve pack of your favorite malted barley beverage, super. By the end of 2012, no more DC 9. Hope I'm wrong.
Reply
Old 10-08-2008 | 09:18 AM
  #90  
JetFlyer06's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Delta
Default

Originally Posted by satchip
The 9s are also approaching their manufacturer's life time cycle limits.
Please quote your source on this, from what I've been told we can fly the 9's well into the next decade (per the DC-9 fleet training captain).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aubrey770
Pilot Health
6
08-08-2008 04:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices