Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

NWA SLI Shenanigans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-25-2008, 10:56 AM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
siemprerojo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: Boeing 757 First Officer and Cessna 182H financier
Posts: 106
Default

Wow, my hat is off to those of you trying to reason with people who justify their self worth by criticizing others. Luckily, I think they are in the minority on both sides. Everyone that I have come in contact with while jumpseating realize that both sides are bringing value to the marriage.
It's going to be a tough merger for those that march around with a feeling of superiority.
siemprerojo is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 12:23 PM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Posts: 296
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
Its not worth arguing with people like him. They obviously believe that Delta sits beautifully at the end of the rainbow and that NWA brings nothing to the table. The DC9 is the RDs chance at fixing their screwup of letting that flying go. The DC9s and the flying they bring is Mainline flying and its now Delta Mainline flying. The 100 seat market is now the Combined DAL pilots flying and its ours to lose. We are all responsible for ensuring it stays at mainline. OUR scope protects it and should continue to protect it. These planes are especially helpful when fuel is falling, the credit market is swamped making financing harder to come by, and the flexibility to redeploy these aircraft anywhere. They can and will likely take back flying from the regionals. 2 dc9s can move the same people as 2-3 50 seaters. As DAL pulls down capacity they can remove frequency without giving up seats by using the DC9s.

These planes are NOW Delta planes. The sooner the RD side realizes that they are their planes and jobs now, the sooner we can work together to protect that flying from here on out.
Delta does not sit at the end of a rainbow. And I do acknowledge that the 9's are ours and we MUST protect scope. But with 35 yr old airplanes in an RNAV world, how long do they realistically have left flying. How much $$ goes into their heavy mx cycles. You have to admit that economically speaking, the company cannot afford to replace the airframes as fast as they will retire them. I hope the 787 is onboard by then to help. From SLI testimony, as the 9's have been retired, RJ's have replaced them. Do 73's have the same staffing but 50% more seats. I realize and am a proponent of all getting along. As a line pilot, what control do we really have over SLI, contracts etc? BTW, I do have over three years flying the 9 so I have some experience with it. Let me be the first to say if you haven't heard already, "Welcome Aboard."
Bigflya is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 12:54 PM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Kingbird87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330B
Posts: 210
Default

You know what Bigflya, you crossed my line with your comments. Your backtracking is palpable. Furlough jets indeed. Do yourself a favor, get off probation, look around at the human beings with families and lives, commitments, and problems and then come back to me with your furlough jets. Trust me, and I've been here over 30 times longer than you have, your day in the barrel will come. Until you realize the guy or gal sitting next to you is more than an operator of a furlough jet, one of the least of your problems is a furlough.
Kingbird87 is offline  
Old 11-25-2008, 06:36 PM
  #104  
Gets Weekends Off
 
newKnow's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: 765-A
Posts: 6,844
Default

By the way, a "source" has told me that they are going to put some kind of GPS in those old, innefficient, furlough jets so they can fly shuttle ops up and down the East coast. And I can honestly say I have never thrown the "source" word around here.

Maybe people will leave the -9 alone after December 8th. Maybe.
newKnow is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 03:40 AM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
satchip's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: Flying the SEC
Posts: 2,350
Default

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post

These planes are NOW Delta planes. The sooner the RD side realizes that they are their planes and jobs now, the sooner we can work together to protect that flying from here on out.
So if the former NW planes are Delta planes then the former NW pilots are Delta pilots too. Thus when one retires all Delta pilots move up and benefit from that retirement, huh? It goes both ways fellas, that's all we're saying.
satchip is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 04:05 AM
  #106  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Kingbird87's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: A330B
Posts: 210
Default

Originally Posted by satchip View Post
So if the former NW planes are Delta planes then the former NW pilots are Delta pilots too. Thus when one retires all Delta pilots move up and benefit from that retirement, huh? It goes both ways fellas, that's all we're saying.
Two's In on your Wing!
Kingbird87 is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 05:28 AM
  #107  
Underboob King
 
Superpilot92's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Guppy Commander
Posts: 4,412
Default

Originally Posted by satchip View Post
So if the former NW planes are Delta planes then the former NW pilots are Delta pilots too. Thus when one retires all Delta pilots move up and benefit from that retirement, huh? It goes both ways fellas, that's all we're saying.
Even under the NWA proposal, YOU would move up in numbers when a NWA pilot retires. Only positions are blocked off, BOTH on the NWA and DAL sides. It goes both ways fellas, thats all we're saying.

The DAL side keeps saying they dont want to fly our aircraft anyway so whats the problem?
Superpilot92 is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 06:12 AM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
tomgoodman's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: 767A (Ret)
Posts: 6,248
Default Ego bidding

Originally Posted by Superpilot92 View Post
The DAL side keeps saying they dont want to fly our aircraft anyway so whats the problem?
An old 727 Captain once told me: "I think I'll bid the L-1011. Don't really want to fly it, but I hate to see anybody junior to me get the thing."
tomgoodman is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 06:45 AM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NWA320pilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: 737 Capt
Posts: 1,166
Default

Originally Posted by tomgoodman View Post
An old 727 Captain once told me: "I think I'll bid the L-1011. Don't really want to fly it, but I hate to see anybody junior to me get the thing."
Excellent point!
NWA320pilot is offline  
Old 11-26-2008, 07:38 AM
  #110  
Back on TDY
 
Carl Spackler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 747-400 Captain
Posts: 12,487
Default

Originally Posted by Bigflya View Post
The DC-9 is a "furlough jet." Your mgmt has told as much by systematically parking them. They are 35+ years old, horribly inefficient, and the flying was quickly being replaced by commuter jets from Mesaba and Compass. Your 787's are coming in who knows when and NWA will not pay to keep hundreds of pilots on the payroll while they waited. You guys rightously made deals to keep as many guys on the property as you could but eventually the numbers would have caught up with you. NWA's old fleet and past commuter jet concessions should not be carried on the backs of the DAL pilot group. When gas skyrocketed, the majority of our cuts came at the commuter level thus saving mainline jobs.
Lighten up Francis.

Carl
Carl Spackler is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NoSoupForYou
Mergers and Acquisitions
37
11-23-2008 01:09 PM
MJB68
Major
6
10-19-2008 12:30 PM
DAL4EVER
Mergers and Acquisitions
12
10-18-2008 01:02 PM
Scoop
Mergers and Acquisitions
176
10-10-2008 07:03 PM
JetFlyer06
Mergers and Acquisitions
4
08-08-2008 08:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices