Search
Notices
Mergers and Acquisitions Facts, rumors, and conjecture

US Airways Appeal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2010, 09:08 AM
  #31  
Line Holder
 
tpmagee's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2008
Position: A nice comfy Boeing seat.
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by FreighterGuyNow View Post
They were all about DOH when sniffing around American Trans Air
Not quite true. I saw the agreed upon relative seniority list. A combined list would have favored ATA in straight DOH -- at least in the top 1/3.
tpmagee is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 09:51 AM
  #32  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by GW258 View Post
You seem to be emotional about this but LCC can't do BK for what you describe. I wish there was a pilot group in control of thier profession but I don't think it is the east LCC folks since thier contract is so poor.

You ever thought Parker approves of the east folks position since he benefits from it on the cost side? He doesn't care about the first pilot's career on that property.

You folks got the wrong enemy in your sights! "infantile idiots", how silly is that?
Not at all emotional..........AFAIC, U can sink or swim.

But Parker sure seems desperate to merge this carrier into just about anyone (perhaps Burger King will be next).................I wonder why that is ?
eaglefly is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 10:12 AM
  #33  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

This can NEVER be resolved. You cannot even ride in the van together from the hotels, let alone be trusted to fly in the same flight deck. Parker has played you all. He will get as much out of you as he can and then merge, while you bicker amongst yourselves. All the while, you go on believing that next year will be better. The Nic award was so egregious that the East pilots had nothing to lose by fighting. Parker clearly understood this. The West, knowing that most airline pilots will eat their own young for a better deal, erroneously figured that there would be enough dissenters on the East side to end this for a pay raise. The West did not understand that the sacrifice of one’s retirement, at an age that it is mathematically impossible to ever recoup it, irreversibly changes a person’s resolve.
justjack is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 10:20 AM
  #34  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Default

Originally Posted by justjack View Post
This can NEVER be resolved. You cannot even ride in the van together from the hotels, let alone be trusted to fly in the same flight deck. Parker has played you all. He will get as much out of you as he can and then merge, while you bicker amongst yourselves. All the while, you go on believing that next year will be better. The Nic award was so egregious that the East pilots had nothing to lose by fighting. Parker clearly understood this. The West, knowing that most airline pilots will eat their own young for a better deal, erroneously figured that there would be enough dissenters on the East side to end this for a pay raise. The West did not understand that the sacrifice of one’s retirement, at an age that it is mathematically impossible to ever recoup it, irreversibly changes a person’s resolve.
The only real meger partner left is AA and they don't seem to be too interested in inheriting this albatross of a carrier.......at least in whole in its current form.

Once things get bad enough (and they will), then AA may be more agressive and Parker more interested about parting out sections or assets without the need for the baggage of the pilots. It would certainly be a boon to their own problems with the APA and avoid their last disaster of the TWA asset acquisition.

......or they can wait longer and get assets in the fire sale.

If Parker really wants to have a chance at returning this carrier to something that's sustainable, he'll have to resolve this pilot squabble once and for all and the only way to rip the pacifiers out of the easties mouths in thru BK.
eaglefly is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 10:49 AM
  #35  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Posts: 581
Default

BK laws have changed AND we have a Democrat in the White House. It would be much easier- even for Parker, to put a deal on the table that makes everyone happy. What this deal will consist of is going to be linked to the result of the LOA 93 decision. Based on the bombastic post by people who were SURE how the 9th would rule, lets agree that no one knows at this point, what that will be. But the die is cast and the company will wait it out until the Fall.
justjack is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 11:33 AM
  #36  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,619
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
I guess binding doesn't mean binding....
The Ninth's ruling says nothing about the arbitration or its binding nature. What they said was a union has to ratify a deal before they can be sued for DFR. The Ninth also said nothing about which seniority integration method is fair or the gold standard.

There was a three party agreement in the AWA/AAA transition agreement with US Air management. That agreement was completed in its entirety and resulted in the Nicolau list. If US Air management deviates from that agreement they face the possibility of damages. I doubt that the management will ever agree to anything other than the Nicolau list as they will open themselves to massive damages for something that provides them with no benefits.

This agreement means that crew room lawyers with equally bad real lawyers, will get to renege on their deal for a little longer. They will take this as a sign they can prevail in this quest, but they will fail. Along the way, they will continue to lag the industry by a greater and greater amount. In the end, this will become the most fruitless and self damaging quests ever in the history of this profession.
alfaromeo is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 12:10 PM
  #37  
Gets Weekends Off
 
brakechatter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by alfaromeo View Post
The Ninth's ruling says nothing about the arbitration or its binding nature. What they said was a union has to ratify a deal before they can be sued for DFR. The Ninth also said nothing about which seniority integration method is fair or the gold standard.

There was a three party agreement in the AWA/AAA transition agreement with US Air management. That agreement was completed in its entirety and resulted in the Nicolau list. If US Air management deviates from that agreement they face the possibility of damages. I doubt that the management will ever agree to anything other than the Nicolau list as they will open themselves to massive damages for something that provides them with no benefits.

This agreement means that crew room lawyers with equally bad real lawyers, will get to renege on their deal for a little longer. They will take this as a sign they can prevail in this quest, but they will fail. Along the way, they will continue to lag the industry by a greater and greater amount. In the end, this will become the most fruitless and self damaging quests ever in the history of this profession.

You have no idea what will happen. Speculating in a post really has no basis for what a court will or will not do. This is what happens--right or wrong--when a group feels as wronged as the east pilots do.Agree with them or not, they prefer the nuclear option over an award which would have likely provided them substantial raises.

..and now a court has agreed that they have done no damage as of yet. I don't think anybody can predict what will happen, nor the legal ramifications if it.
brakechatter is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 03:42 PM
  #38  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Splash's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2010
Position: Boeing Boss
Posts: 335
Default

The die is cast. No pilot wearing the Airways uniform, or their bargaining agent, will be trusted again.

Binding arbitration doesn't mean "unless we don't like it".

No one will ever forget what has happened here.
Splash is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 04:08 PM
  #39  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Pineapple Guy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,462
Default

Originally Posted by Splash View Post
The die is cast. No pilot wearing the Airways uniform, or their bargaining agent, will be trusted again.

Binding arbitration doesn't mean "unless we don't like it".

No one will ever forget what has happened here.
Amen - truer words were never spoken.
Pineapple Guy is offline  
Old 06-05-2010, 06:26 PM
  #40  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Dashdog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 433
Default

Originally Posted by Splash View Post
No pilot wearing the Airways uniform, or their bargaining agent, will be trusted again.
........By whom?
Dashdog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Frisky Pilot
Regional
20
01-01-2022 05:02 PM
whoareyou310
Piedmont Airlines
59
08-21-2009 05:59 AM
cactiboss
Major
64
05-01-2009 08:42 PM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
03-07-2005 11:04 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices