Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Mesa Airlines
United confirms parking 38 emb175 for Elsa >

United confirms parking 38 emb175 for Elsa

Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

United confirms parking 38 emb175 for Elsa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2023, 05:00 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LizzyBorden's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: Crash Axe in Hand
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66 View Post
ok you know best
253 over 70 seats it’s 253 and will stay 253 let me assure you that
And let me assure you that they want over 400 over 70 seats to fly and feed the large expansion they plan and hiring for
BTW they asked for scope relief for up to 150 large RJs and got the big hell no
The only way is to bring them in-house or buy 220s or 195s in house in order to increase the 253 cap
94 percent voted NO few months ago if you can recall
and both alpa and management looking for a solution
What i said is on the table

Now carry on
More realistic for them to bring on the 220 or 195's before they ever consider bringing on the 70-76 seat airplanes under mainline I can assure you that.

Your chest puffing is kinda funny by the way.
LizzyBorden is offline  
Old 01-06-2023, 11:15 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Captain
Posts: 1,561
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden View Post
More realistic for them to bring on the 220 or 195's before they ever consider bringing on the 70-76 seat airplanes under mainline I can assure you that.

Your chest puffing is kinda funny by the way.

carry on Lizzy
carry on

keep your attitude home when and if you get on with UAL
Sniper66 is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 06:37 AM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66 View Post
carry on Lizzy
carry on

keep your attitude home when and if you get on with UAL
I don’t think that he’s wrong. Kirby does want a bunch of 175’s to feed, but he wants them farmed out to the lowest bidder. He also knows that we won’t give an inch on scope and that we wouldn’t agree to B-scale rates for United pilots to fly the 175 on our certificate. We’re taking delivery of around 100 max’s this year. We just exercised options to buy even more for future deliveries. As much as I agree that Kirby would love the rj’s, he knows that we won’t budge on scope and bringing them over to UAL would cost more than he wants to pay. He also knows that reduced frequency using larger aircraft requires fewer pilots. He seems to be doubling down on larger aircraft and reduced frequency. He needs to keep that carrot dangling out there until we have the lift to park the 145’s and 200’s. At that point UAX feed will consist of the current allotment of 70/76 seaters and UAL will do the rest with reduced frequency. The 175’s that United owns can eventually be moved to the exclusive carriers and provide plenty of seats for Aviate graduates to build experience.
Hedley is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 06:46 AM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by pangolin View Post
Beneficial in training pipeline. Beneficial in INSTANT lift especially since the Air Wisconsin lift is going away.
Yeah, been scratching my head about the whole thing, but this is what I came up with as well. An element of UA utilizing the -900s to get some (relatively) instant lift, and "shrinking Mesa to profitability" by eventually getting rid of the -900s and moving everything to the ERJ.

Mesa has -175s and -900s, and what sounds like enough pilot staffing to cover flying maybe 65% of each fleet.

Take those -900s, paint "United Express" on the side, and you've got more lift.

While you're painting planes (and I suppose some changes to the interior to accommodate the AA to UA switch), run as many of those CRJ pilots through ERJ training as you can.

Eventual goal is to have the ERJs staffed at 100%, and the CRJs gotten rid of.

Related, there is an ongoing push throughout the industry to get rid of the 50 seater CRJ-200 / ERJ-145. Both due to customer experience, and because the aircraft are just old. The mainline carriers don't want to give up the advantages of outsourcing their flying to the regionals though, so I suspect there will be a shuffle amongst the carriers. As CRJ-200s / ERJ-145s go away, carriers that had flown those aircraft will get CRJ-700s or ERJs "handed down" to them.
fasteddie800 is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 06:54 AM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2022
Position: pilot
Posts: 144
Default

Originally Posted by fasteddie800 View Post
so I suspect there will be a shuffle amongst the carriers. As CRJ-200s / ERJ-145s go away, carriers that had flown those aircraft will get CRJ-700s or ERJs "handed down" to them.
How would that work? I'm still not clear on the scope issue relative to UA.
killbilly is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 07:01 AM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2020
Posts: 2,219
Default

Originally Posted by killbilly View Post
How would that work? I'm still not clear on the scope issue relative to UA.
The current number of 175’s would be reallocated to where United wants them. If a carrier lost 50 seaters, that doesn’t mean that they get 70/76 seaters in exchange. They could just become smaller or go away.
Hedley is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 07:45 AM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LizzyBorden's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: Crash Axe in Hand
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by Sniper66 View Post
carry on Lizzy
carry on

keep your attitude home when and if you get on with UAL
So lets see here...

Still hanging out in regional forums. check
Barks about scope and puffs out chest with a sense of self importance. check
Tells others to check their attitude if they want to work at (insert airline here). check


I have seat requests that have been in my coat pocket longer than you have been at United.
LizzyBorden is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 07:53 AM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Posts: 147
Default

Originally Posted by Hedley View Post
If a carrier lost 50 seaters, that doesn’t mean that they get 70/76 seaters in exchange. They could just become smaller or go away.
Yeah. I'd love to see ERJs / CRJs flown at mainline UA. And maybe it'll happen someday.

Before that happens though, UA will shuffle airplanes from one regional operator to another. They'll keep doing that as long as they can. In the process, some regionals will shrink, some will go under. Some fleets will go away (50-seaters, etc).

From a business perspective though, it pays for UA to keep as much flying at the regional level as they can, for as long as they can, until the financials no longer pencil-out.
fasteddie800 is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 07:59 AM
  #49  
Gets Weekends Off
 
LizzyBorden's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2022
Position: Crash Axe in Hand
Posts: 387
Default

Originally Posted by fasteddie800 View Post
Yeah. I'd love to see ERJs / CRJs flown at mainline. And maybe it'll happen someday.

Before that happens though, the mainline carriers will shuffle airplanes from one regional operator to another. They'll keep doing that as long as they can. In the process, some regionals will shrink, some will go under. Some fleets will go away (50-seaters, etc).

From a business perspective though, it pays for UA to keep as much flying at the regional level as they can, for as long as they can, until the financials no longer pencil-out.
30+ years of regional jet flying has proven that mainline carriers do not want to dabble with regional jets. The less than 100 seat market will vanish before mainline carriers take that stuff on themselves. This is not a theory,as economics and the US airline business model have proven it so.
LizzyBorden is offline  
Old 01-07-2023, 08:17 AM
  #50  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,949
Default

Originally Posted by LizzyBorden View Post
30+ years of regional jet flying has proven that mainline carriers do not want to dabble with regional jets. The less than 100 seat market will vanish before mainline carriers take that stuff on themselves. This is not a theory,as economics and the US airline business model have proven it so.
Do you think the less than 100 seat market will vanish?

Do you have a prediction of about when?
TransWorld is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FriendlyPilot
United
124
10-07-2022 12:50 PM
Boeing Aviator
=> United Contract 2022
16
08-27-2022 07:19 AM
iahflyr
United
0
08-02-2018 08:58 AM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices