Latest Mesa News... Straight From Paul Foley
06-15-2009, 10:45 AM
#41
ULTP-Ultra Low Tier Pilot
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,228
Originally Posted by SrfNFly227
Thought OJ was in Jail??? 
Originally Posted by eaglefly
Correct..........both slash indiscriminantly for their own needs without concern of the effect on others or future consequneces for themselves.
06-15-2009, 11:01 AM
#42
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 661
Originally Posted by duvie
Why wouldn't you prefer your company to grow?
no no I understand of course you would want your company to grow. I'm just saying out of everyone, those guys at ExpressJet haven't seen new flying come their way in a long time. It'd be nice to see a bone thrown their way.
06-15-2009, 11:08 AM
#43
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: MD80
Posts: 1,111
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
no no I understand of course you would want your company to grow. I'm just saying out of everyone, those guys at ExpressJet haven't seen new flying come their way in a long time. It'd be nice to see a bone thrown their way.
06-15-2009, 11:23 AM
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: A320
Posts: 661
Originally Posted by AirWillie
These planes will not be replaced by 50 seaters. Otherwise why take out dirt cheap mesa crj200s in the first place? UA is in love with bigger RJs. I can think of a whole bunch of places that would love the mesa crj200 ord/iad flying.
True UA does love the 50+ seat markets, but if they put 70 and 90 seaters on some of those routes (ORD-LAN, AZO, Owasso etc) I'd be really surprised. I agree the higher fuel prices get the more seats on an RJ the better but that doesn't mean 50 seat markets no longer exist. Mesa does a lot of flying that the 70/90 seaters would support, but they also do a lot of flying where anything bigger than 50 seats doesn't make sense.
06-15-2009, 11:51 AM
#45
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 787
Originally Posted by JetBlast77
True UA does love the 50+ seat markets, but if they put 70 and 90 seaters on some of those routes (ORD-LAN, AZO, Owasso etc) I'd be really surprised. I agree the higher fuel prices get the more seats on an RJ the better but that doesn't mean 50 seat markets no longer exist. Mesa does a lot of flying that the 70/90 seaters would support, but they also do a lot of flying where anything bigger than 50 seats doesn't make sense.
06-15-2009, 02:11 PM
#47
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Pilot sleeping.
Posts: 615
Originally Posted by flycrj200
UAL can not just cancel the contract. Mesa would takes United to court an win. Just look at Delta.
06-15-2009, 02:32 PM
#49
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: Reclined
Posts: 2,168
Originally Posted by flycrj200
The Mesa rumor is not true. The source of the rumor; Paul Foley is a senior manager. A senior manager with a large amount of stock options will never, in public, speak of the demise of his company.
It also could be helpful if the company is plannign to buy back a quantity of outstanding public stock.
06-15-2009, 02:39 PM
#50
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: A320 FO
Posts: 1,454
Originally Posted by Mason32
Depends what type of options his friends are holding for him... a bunch of puts would be nice with a tumbling stock price....
It also could be helpful if the company is plannign to buy back a quantity of outstanding public stock.
It also could be helpful if the company is plannign to buy back a quantity of outstanding public stock.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
