Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Heading to Mesa

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2014, 11:20 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Another RJ FO
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by prior121 View Post
All this Mesa bashing baffles me. Actually, it quite honestly makes me sick.

I am treated like a human being here which I was not at RAH.

I make more money here than RAH.

We have GREAT people in the training dept. We have two GREAT Chief Pilots.

I have only been here a year and I hold an 85 hour, 15 day off line.

I am looking at a fall upgrade.

So first year pay is two dollars less than you Skywest folks?

The difference is, if you get in now at Mesa, you will never see 3rd year FO pay, heck you may never see 2nd year FO pay.

Good grief.
I'm glad to hear that things have improved there from what they were years ago. That being said the thing that would still turn me off to Mesa is the fact that they're cold calling people for classes that applied 10 years ago, and they're hiring people with only phone interviews. Those are the people I would have to sit in the cockpit with on a 4 day and they're just being hired because they have an ATP and a pulse. I imagine in the future you'll be forced to fly with some real pieces of work due to that practice.
rcfd13 is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 11:22 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2010
Posts: 598
Default

Originally Posted by rcfd13 View Post
I'm glad to hear that things have improved there from what they were years ago. That being said the thing that would still turn me off to Mesa is the fact that they're cold calling people for classes that applied 10 years ago, and they're hiring people with only phone interviews. Those are the people I would have to sit in the cockpit with on a 4 day and they're just being hired because they have an ATP and a pulse. I imagine in the future you'll be forced to fly with some real pieces of work due to that practice.
Not arguing for their practices, but you fly with real pieces of work no matter what the hiring practices of a company are.
Ar Pilot is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 11:26 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2009
Position: Another RJ FO
Posts: 1,272
Default

Originally Posted by Ar Pilot View Post
Not arguing for their practices, but you fly with real pieces of work no matter what the hiring practices of a company are.
Some places have more than others. In 2.5 years at my current regional I've only flown with 1 captain that I could never stand to fly with again, and one more that I'd prefer not to fly with but could put up with. I feel like that's not too bad for 2.5 years. I think different airlines have different ratios of good:bad. I imagine hiring with phone interviews will lead to a bigger amount of the bad ones that couldn't get hired anywhere else.
rcfd13 is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 11:37 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 611
Default

Originally Posted by squall line View Post
And Skywest is starting revenue service sooner than Mesa, but both had their first planes delivered at the same time. They are simply on a different schedule. Why burn gas if you don't have to?
SkyWest first delivery: March 25, 2014

Mesa first delivery: April 10, 2014

Two week difference on delivery, four week difference on start date. But sure, SkyWest wasted more money doing it. Because it's worth doing right, is it not?
NVUS is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:30 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prior121's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
Default

Originally Posted by NVUS View Post
SkyWest flew their's all over the place, proving run after proving run. Training flight after training flight. I guess one airline does it right, and another airlines does it as cheaply as possible.
Your high school accounting teacher would be so proud of that philosophy...

"Since we have them lets go fly them around and waste money!"

Are you kidding me?
prior121 is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:33 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prior121's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
Default

Originally Posted by bedrock View Post
It's great to hear MESA has improved its working conditions, but you've been around long enough to know the history of that place and the statements and actions of Ornstein. He openly despises pilots--that means you. They also made it their goal to be the bottom of the bottom feeders.

You know that we don't operate in a vacuum. When the majors play this musical chairs game with whipsaw we ALL suffer. You are being treated well NOW, because it serves their purpose and they are a renewed airline with low labor costs. Maybe you hit it right, get in, GTFO, don't care about who you fly for. Or maybe MESA will just keep growing as those mainline jobs disappear to be transformed into poorly paid regional jobs.

Meanwhile a great group of guys who have spent most of their careers at Eagle (many due to furlough from AA) are about to be hosed because they refused to set the bar any lower. This also goes for all the other regional pilots who said No Mas!.
Please point out in my statements where I have said anything negative about Eagle or happy that we may or may not get AAG 175's. I would love them to go to Eagle over us.

We have pay rates for them in our contract. They're have the ability to show up on property here whether you or I like it.

Please don't construed my points.
prior121 is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:41 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by prior121 View Post
Your high school accounting teacher would be so proud of that philosophy...

"Since we have them lets go fly them around and waste money!"

Are you kidding me?
So its a waste of money to ensure your pilots are properly trained before flying around paying passengers?
air101 is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:47 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2009
Position: Courtroom
Posts: 177
Default

Originally Posted by FaceBiter View Post
Remember, not only are we talking about the airline that hired a roid pumping reckless retard as a pilot. This is a company that allows him to hire pilots decreased libido and all. Conventional wisdom does not apply.
I caution you that since you have clearly stated who this person is, by name, what his current title at Mesa Airlines, INC. is, and by using such statements as "roid pumping reckless retard pilot." This is borderline libel and could be grounds for a defamation lawsuit.
I have seen judges allow internet records to be subpoenaed many times. Just something to keep in mind.
citation35hf is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:51 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2014
Posts: 484
Default

Originally Posted by citation35hf View Post
I caution you that since you have clearly stated who this person is, by name, what his current title at Mesa Airlines, INC. is, and by using such statements as "roid pumping reckless retard pilot." This is borderline libel and could be grounds for a defamation lawsuit.
I have seen judges allow internet records to be subpoenaed many times. Just something to keep in mind.
LOL funniest thing I have read all day
air101 is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 01:02 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
prior121's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Position: 175 Left
Posts: 1,539
Default

Originally Posted by air101 View Post
So its a waste of money to ensure your pilots are properly trained before flying around paying passengers?
There are table top and proving runs required by the FAA when a new aircraft comes on a certificate. Those are done.

Why would you go take a 30 million dollar empty jet around the pattern for no reason?

But I guess I'm they same guy that asks people all the time why you would go take out 100k in loans to come fly a jet for 22k a year.
prior121 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
paxhauler85
Regional
16
04-21-2008 07:28 AM
familyguy
Regional
49
04-11-2008 12:03 AM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM
Lbell911
Regional
23
10-17-2007 03:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices