Search
Notices
Mesa Airlines Regional Airline

Mesa 3.0

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-04-2016, 09:58 PM
  #101  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by iFlyRC View Post
Money is one thing, reserve work rules is another. Pretty sure crew tracking does a better job driving away people than the pay.
Yeah--for example, they could set buffers algorithmically--i.e., based on historical absences & reserve utilization for specific days/weeks/months--rather than arbitrarily raising them to "slightly above whatever we think we'll have available."

In this day and age of open-source/free/easy-to-use predictive modelling software/APIs (Google Predict comes to mind), I find it absolutely insane (from both a company and pilot QOL perspective) that Crew Line is still arbitrarily picking ONE buffer number for every day of the entire month. We all know that holidays, weekends, Super Bowl Sunday, etc. etc. generate more sick calls & absences. We all know that certain months will generate more hub IROPs than others--these are historical facts that an algorithm can account for much more accurately and quickly than a human--and FOR FREE given the current ecosystem of free APIs/software packages.

Also, as an example of how insane our arbitrary buffers are--if an IROP does hit your base, commuters are going to miss segments of their 3/4-day trips. Those segments are going to drop into open time and reduce net reserves, and some reserves are going to miss their reserve periods. An automated reserve-buffer setting system would automatically account for the IROP, sync with Flica, and raise reserve buffers for the next 3-4 days in realtime. THAT would make infinite sense. The way we do it now is a lazy, barbaric "welp looks like we got 14 people on average on reserve next month--set the buffer to 17 for every single day all month long and we'll hope it works out."

Lastly (re: work rules/Crew Line & Tracking practices) I'm just a line pilot, but based on some previous experience in tech/Computer Science in the past few years, I find it absolutely insane that human beings are still manually processing trip trade/drop requests based on easily-programmable 117 paramaters and what (should) be an easily-programmable buffer-setting function. It literally makes me laugh out loud...it's like if a company started a call-center where employees had to call in/submit a request to a human being to calculate things like 2+4 or 5+7. It is literally that absurd.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 08:59 AM
  #102  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Default

Welcome to we want to control your qol.
buddies8 is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 11:28 AM
  #103  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by CrosswindSolo View Post
Mesa started a Pilot Recruitment Facebook page. Looks like the pilot shortage has finally caught up to them. To be honest, I really do hope you guys get brought up to industry average pay and the pilot group doesn't fall apart. I have a good friend with you in Houston who says he really likes the pilot group, schedule, and hands off management. I'd enjoy the opportunity to live in Houston and the E175 would be a nice bonus, but I can't justify it at $22/hr.
Indeed, it does appear 'the shortage' has caught up to them. Also looks like the upgrade gravy train has come to a screeching halt. Haven't seen a standing bid for upgrades in a couple of months. No upgrades. Bottom of the industry pay. Now whats the selling point again? JO and company are gonna have to pi$$ or get of the pot and do something to recruit/retain or all those pretty new Ejets will be sitting idle…But I will agree the pilot group is pretty cool.
alphasierra01 is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 11:31 AM
  #104  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: CFI
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by alphasierra01 View Post
JO and company are gonna have to pi$$ or get of the pot and do something to recruit/retain or all those pretty new Ejets will be sitting idle…But I will agree the pilot group is pretty cool.
The info that came out of the DFW LEC meeting is that the company wants a contract ASAP, but it's our guys who are taking their time.

The MEC only has the negotiating committee meeting 3 days per month.
USMCmech is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 12:24 PM
  #105  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Navmode's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2013
Posts: 774
Default

Originally Posted by USMCmech View Post
The info that came out of the DFW LEC meeting is that the company wants a contract ASAP, but it's our guys who are taking their time.

The MEC only has the negotiating committee meeting 3 days per month.
Except what they won't do is come up with a realistic proposal to drop in the lap of the MEC. They want to nickel and dime us on Mickey Mouse garbage like paying for KCM. Not even to mention the $10,000+/year pay disparity between us and what our competitors offer, often for flying smaller airplanes. The only thing JO offers is deflection and fantasy.
Navmode is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 02:04 PM
  #106  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: CFI
Posts: 93
Default

Originally Posted by Navmode View Post
Except what they won't do is come up with a realistic proposal to drop in the lap of the MEC. They want to nickel and dime us on Mickey Mouse garbage like paying for KCM. Not even to mention the $10,000+/year pay disparity between us and what our competitors offer, often for flying smaller airplanes. The only thing JO offers is deflection and fantasy.
Take the last TA, drop in Skywest's pay scale. Done.

I know, I know, there's no money, that pay scale will bankrupt the company, etc. I don't care.


Seriously, when I started here, about 2 years ago, Mesa's FO payscale was only 2/hr less than the industry standard. This was more than compensated by the opportunity to be based where I was already living. Now, there is a 15,000 difference from Mesa to other regionals serving the same hubs.

Today, 35-40K/yr is the market rate for new FOs, Mesa either must meet that or shrink as attrition kicks into high gear. I know plenty of guys who would love to come here, but they can't take a 50% paycut from flying a Kingair and still feed their families.
USMCmech is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 03:11 PM
  #107  
Living the Dream
 
deltajuliet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,795
Default

Originally Posted by USMCmech View Post
Take the CURRENT TA, drop in Skywest's pay scale. Done.
While eliminating the 50-seat pay, of course. Elimination of CMF/CML alone made the new TA worse.

Then again, hotel language would be nice...
deltajuliet is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 03:29 PM
  #108  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 227
Default

Originally Posted by MagPBS View Post
True you didn't. But that's the common theme. To be honest we agree they're far from ideal. And there will always be those who don't believe the stuff we put out and will continue to believe that Mesa doing it on purpose and laughing all the way. I will say productive pairings are the one thing both sides agree on. The staffing model is based on pilots averaging 85 hours. So it's really not saving money to be at 76 hours, it requires MORE bodies and that costs more money. But the reality is that overnight staging, far's and dynamic flight changes from day to day drastically effect how well pairings work out.


When 117 came along. UA had meetings with everyone including all their regionals about what needed to be changed and how the overall picture needed to be changed as a result.

AA (US at the time) said they weren't going to make any marketing changes as a result and it was up to us to figure it out.

That pretty much sums up the two partners.
Compass has several 16-21hr 3 days, 24-28hr 4 days, and 25-36hr 5 days. Oh and there's a large number of those that are commutable on both ends, the rest are on one end. It's very possible to build quality pairings. There were junior captains that had 75-80hrs with 16-18 days off.
JohnDoe is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 05:16 PM
  #109  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2011
Posts: 688
Default

Originally Posted by JohnDoe View Post
Compass has several 16-21hr 3 days, 24-28hr 4 days, and 25-36hr 5 days. Oh and there's a large number of those that are commutable on both ends, the rest are on one end. It's very possible to build quality pairings. There were junior captains that had 75-80hrs with 16-18 days off.
Different bases. Different flying. Different credit rules.
Sennant is offline  
Old 07-05-2016, 11:32 PM
  #110  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2010
Posts: 977
Default

Originally Posted by Sennant View Post
Different bases. Different flying. Different credit rules.
What Sennant meant to say (but is unable to, because he is an ALPA = management lurker) is: "better bases, better flying, better credit rules."

Oh, and he forgot to say: insanely better pay, hotels, and comparable upgrade times to our EJet fleet going forward.
flapshalfspeed is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
Regional
31
07-31-2018 04:58 PM
rabsing76
Mesa Airlines
232
10-20-2017 08:59 AM
winglet
Regional
45
12-18-2008 05:06 PM
CaribPilot
Regional
14
07-06-2008 06:37 PM
Squawk8800
Regional
5
04-08-2008 08:50 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices