Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
USAF Chief retention plan >

USAF Chief retention plan

Search

Notices
Military Military Aviation

USAF Chief retention plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-16-2017 | 03:55 AM
  #11  
Dragon7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 524
Likes: 0
From: Pressing On
Default

The Generals and Admirals are not at this point intellectually equipped to solve the pilot manning problem. The problem will be solved the same way the last 3 pilot shortages were, and that is when the airlines stop hiring.
Reply
Old 02-16-2017 | 07:17 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Default

Strait from FAA bud. The Chief was asked if he could allow the faa to have access to your full med records to help med screen guys. In 2004 the FAA was allowed to audit list of those who were receiving disibility from VA. This did not allow them to look at med records but what you were receiving benefits for. This request is a can of worms. Dont put it past chief to trade for what he needs. If this happens many guys will be having there post air force civil flying job at risk.
Reply
Old 02-16-2017 | 07:19 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 463
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Hrkdrivr
The AF (all military really) pilot retention problem will fix itself (different take than awax).

Drones will replace most of the manned cockpits sooner than later. With the F-35 we might have the last manned fighter. Bombers next. Transports last. It will certainly happen sooner in military airplanes than civil/airline airliners.
And who are going to operate those drones ? Reread your post to see how idiotic it sounds. We can't even replace 69 year old BUFFS and 43 year old hercs. We are at least a century away from drones replacing manned pilots.
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 07:43 AM
  #14  
Merle Dixon's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: Legacy FO, T-38 IP
Default

Originally Posted by Dragon7
The Generals and Admirals are not at this point intellectually equipped to solve the pilot manning problem. The problem will be solved the same way the last 3 pilot shortages were, and that is when the airlines stop hiring.
"Not intellectually equipped" so, so true. Unfortunately for the AF and Navy, the US civilian airline pilot mandatory retirements the next decade are unprecedented in US aviation history. Not to mention the Asian carriers that are offering big $ for pilots (their growth is just beginning). The hiring boom is just getting started.

The Dum-dums that run the AF and Navy better do something ASAP.
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 02:57 PM
  #15  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Default

How would lowering the hours required for 121 make less pilots leave the Air Force? No offense meant to anyone but if an airline has a choice between hiring someone with 250hrs of hiring a military pilot with over 1,500 hours which one do you think they are going to choose? The only way to stop pilots from leaving the military for the airlines is to improve the pay and QOL in the military.
Out of touch...
Reply
Old 02-17-2017 | 03:25 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 293
Likes: 2
Default

The military pilot would not directly complete alongside the 250 pilot. They would again fill the regional ranks from the bottom, swelling the pool of regional captains. Those 3-5000+ hour RJ captains are the ones who would (theoretically at least) increase pressure on the post military demographic.
Personally I'm not sure that Fingers' hypothesis could pan out in the long run, but is certain to further erode trust in leadership by line pilots. Whomever this staff officer with limitless potential is that suggested this course of action needs a 365--SDE soonest!
Reply
Old 02-18-2017 | 06:13 PM
  #17  
PurpleToolBox's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,626
Likes: 0
Default

The A3 staff at the Pentagon has suggested several programs to help correct the pilot shortage. Unfortunately A1 staff shot down nearly every suggested program. This is out of the hands of the CSAF.

Yet, in my specialized unit, we are losing four O-5s and two O-4s this summer due to retirements (most reaching mandatory separation dates). These are all very experienced subject matter experts in their career fields and the stupid USAF is kicking them out, during a severe manpower shortage, because they didn't make rank. Worse, nobody seems to be willing to fill their spots.
Reply
Old 02-19-2017 | 04:41 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BFMthisA10
The military pilot would not directly complete alongside the 250 pilot. They would again fill the regional ranks from the bottom, swelling the pool of regional captains. Those 3-5000+ hour RJ captains are the ones who would (theoretically at least) increase pressure on the post military demographic.
Personally I'm not sure that Fingers' hypothesis could pan out in the long run, but is certain to further erode trust in leadership by line pilots. Whomever this staff officer with limitless potential is that suggested this course of action needs a 365--SDE soonest!
It will not effect military hiring at the major level one bit. It would flood the market with RJ pilots and make it harder for RJ pilots to get jobs with the majors. The majors have their demographic to follow. Usually about 30-35% military hiring. That's not going to change.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 02-19-2017 | 02:09 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ohlsan
Here are some ideas that might help:
- reduce additional duties, let pilots fly
- increase flying hour programs, let pilots fly
- reduce PCS's, let families grow roots
- increase flight pay substantially, combine the bonus into flight pay so it comes as a monthly incentive.
- remove toxic leaders, I don't know how to do this , but it needs to happen
I agree 100%. As an Army '60 pilot my "additional" duty is to fly. Most of us are loaded down with other duties and, occasionally, we get to fly.

Give us more hours, many times we barely get minimums - 8 hours a month for us.

Yep, keep us in one area for more than 3 years.

Increase flight pay to keep me around and not leave.

And get rid of toxic leadership! Just one or two people can drag the whole company down.
Reply
Old 02-19-2017 | 07:21 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,485
Likes: 0
From: Taco Rocket Operator
Default

How can somebody this clueless be running the Air Force? Your first clue that that whoever wrote this article hadn't done a lick of actual research was the line that Private Pilots have to have 1500 hours to fly for an airline. LOL. Last time I checked you had to have a Commercial License to apply for the ATP. But who cares about facts. This Goldfiend or whoever doesn't even understand who he is competing against. The only airlines hiring 1500 hour pilots are regional airlines, and unless a USAF fixed wing pilot is out of currency, hasn't flown in years, or has some other issue he is not even looking at a regional. The only military guys seriously looking at regionals are helicopter pilots and even some of those guys are getting on at mainline carriers.

Geez with guys like this in charge its no wonder the military is in such a mess right now.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dave Behnke
Cargo
109
08-27-2014 01:45 PM
hopeSales
United
33
05-15-2014 02:58 PM
cruiseclimb
Regional
0
12-15-2006 07:09 AM
Sir James
Money Talk
2
09-30-2005 06:42 AM
Sir James
Major
2
07-29-2005 09:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices