Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Vrrad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2017, 08:26 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: UnemploymentJet
Posts: 314
Default Vrrad

Retired Air Force pilots welcomed back on active duty

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDODAF/bulletins/1bab3ce

The VRRAD has been approved since July 11, first I've heard of it.

Wow... But guess I can't say I'm totally surprised...
nfnsquared is offline  
Old 10-02-2017, 12:57 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 157
Default

So lemme get this straight...

"We are CRITICALLY undermanned in pilots AF-wide..." so we'll take 25 people back on AD. Wow, a whole 25 dudes.
Let's see...just CONUS we have SOCOM, CENTCOM, STRATCOM, NORTHCOM, & TRANSCOM. Then there is ACC, AMC, GSC, AETC, AFPC, & AFMC.
Assuming only non-joint billets get filled, that's like 2 dudes/dudettes per staff...whew, glad we're making a difference!

Oh, and my favorite..."You can't fly, but you have to get a Class II flying physical."

Only AFPC can screw up an Anvil with a rubber mallet. Oh, and Security Forces.
Castle Bravo is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 12:40 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: UnemploymentJet
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Castle Bravo View Post
So lemme get this straight...

"We are CRITICALLY undermanned in pilots AF-wide..." so we'll take 25 people back on AD. Wow, a whole 25 dudes.
Let's see...just CONUS we have SOCOM, CENTCOM, STRATCOM, NORTHCOM, & TRANSCOM. Then there is ACC, AMC, GSC, AETC, AFPC, & AFMC.
Assuming only non-joint billets get filled, that's like 2 dudes/dudettes per staff...whew, glad we're making a difference!

Oh, and my favorite..."You can't fly, but you have to get a Class II flying physical."

Only AFPC can screw up an Anvil with a rubber mallet. Oh, and Security Forces.

Well, looks like the 25 was set by law, not AFPC. And now the number is up to 1,000:

https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/21/trum...ed-pilots.html
nfnsquared is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 01:20 PM
  #4  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 16
Default

Given that it reads like a **** deal, why would anyone, let alone 1000 pilots, take AFPC up on this?
VandalF16 is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 02:12 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,074
Default

Originally Posted by VandalF16 View Post
Given that it reads like a **** deal, why would anyone, let alone 1000 pilots, take AFPC up on this?
Cause it doesnt have to be voluntary.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 10-21-2017, 06:48 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Sounds like there is a critical over demand for bloated staffs.... maybe start there.

Glad you enjoyed your retirement. You're going to be the COS for Gen Nobodycares in easteran crapistan. Oh and if you don't perform we'll admin sep you and say good bye to your retirement.
Grumble is offline  
Old 10-22-2017, 05:54 AM
  #7  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 16
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
Cause it doesnt have to be voluntary.
At this point it is, but I agree this is the first step towards the AF making it involuntary. Strange decision if they do though, it won't fix the problem and the CSAF understands this. Publicly he says the AF won't stop loss, but this seems like a slightly different way of doing just that in the near term.
VandalF16 is offline  
Old 10-23-2017, 03:36 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Nov 2008
Position: UnemploymentJet
Posts: 314
Default

https://www.usnews.com/news/politics...o-fix-shortage
nfnsquared is offline  
Old 10-23-2017, 03:53 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
hindsight2020's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Center seat, doing loops to music
Posts: 825
Default

There ya go boys, all is well. Back to counting your pro-sharing checks and kvetching about green slips
hindsight2020 is offline  
Old 10-24-2017, 03:20 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: KC-135 IP
Posts: 35
Default

Originally Posted by VandalF16 View Post
At this point it is, but I agree this is the first step towards the AF making it involuntary. Strange decision if they do though, it won't fix the problem and the CSAF understands this. Publicly he says the AF won't stop loss, but this seems like a slightly different way of doing just that in the near term.


The problem with stop loss is that they have to provide congress with a plan to end the stop loss program. Since they have been unsuccessful so far in any of those efforts, they would have a tough time justifying it to congress. This also assumes congress is doing their job


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
kc135pirate is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices