USAF tackles pilot shortage:
#21
On Reserve
Joined APC: Jan 2022
Posts: 24
Did that program I read annoy in 2017/2018 every go through? It was to offer two paths; one being the traditional move up, hold command positions, staff, blah both blah traditional route and the other was geared to letting the flyers be flyers over the course of their career. It seemed like a real way to address the issue seen in your industry is moving up means moving away from hit flight line.
#22
the newer two piece flight suits. https://www.uspatriottactical.com/ma...hoC7hgQAvD_BwE
I’ve got one and love it. I can layer up under it or take a layer off if it’s hot. Easier to put on or take off. So much better then the old adult onesie. Makes pooping soooooo much easier.
I’ve got one and love it. I can layer up under it or take a layer off if it’s hot. Easier to put on or take off. So much better then the old adult onesie. Makes pooping soooooo much easier.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 595
But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear.
Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast.
Last edited by Hobbit64; 01-18-2022 at 05:51 AM.
#24
A space focused force is not a bad idea. I’ve sat in on some of the briefs of what our near peer competitors (especially one in particular) are doing or want to do in space. The space dudes are nerds, but important nerds, and getting out of the shadow of the Air Force has helped and will help them focus on their mission. Totally agree on the name being a miss though. Pulling from the RUMINT wheel again, but apparently Space Corps was under heavy consideration, but the Marines threw a fit over the possibility of the word Corps being added to the end of Space.
"YOU'RE joining the Corps after graduation??? How many pullups can you do?"
"None. How many DDoS attacks can you execute in 90 seconds?"
You could have made the same argument for a Cyber Force, perhaps with more urgency. Although we kind of already have a national cyber force comprised of NSA and their not-so-loose affiliation with cybercom and it's subordinate elements.
#25
Military Uniform stupidity is ingrained in the culture. Once upon a time NORAD - in a fit of concern over midair’s - painted all their tip tanks day-glo orange. Then yo up the ante, got day-glo orange flight suits. When the squadrons eventually rotated to SEA and got shot down, they found a real dearth of day-glo orange vegetation to hide in.
Later on a USAF Chief of staff was also uniform obsessed. Came up with a number of different uniforms - that no one but he liked.
https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0109uniform/
Fortunately, he only held that position for three years and the institution slow-rolled his idiocy until someone more reasonable replaced him.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-3ab085817d68/
I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer.
Later on a USAF Chief of staff was also uniform obsessed. Came up with a number of different uniforms - that no one but he liked.
https://www.airforcemag.com/article/0109uniform/
Fortunately, he only held that position for three years and the institution slow-rolled his idiocy until someone more reasonable replaced him.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archi...-3ab085817d68/
I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer.
#26
I knew a senior officer who - as a young captain - had been selected to test wear the blue flight suit McPeak had designed. Besides sharing the NORAD flight suit problem of little blue vegetation to assist with the E&E, it pretty much made the wearer look like a giant smurf according to the senior officer.
#29
back in the late 90’s when the AVN BDU’s came out, their cost was 4 times what a one piece flight suit cost. And they wore out much faster. Stupid!
But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear.
Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast.
But Hey! What’s a few bucks? As long as SGM isn’t upset or feeling others have a cooler outfit to wear.
Navy paints their boats first, the Army does Army stuff first. Nature of the beast.
The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 595
You're right but I think there' s a distinct difference between how the navy treats aviation versus how the army treats aviation. Naval aviation is given its own priority and isn't competing with the air force - we've got our own C130's, our own 737 transports, etc., and aviators in VP, VR and VQ squadrons (P-8, C-37. C-40, C-130, EP-3, E-6) never touch the blue water navy, never have to do underway cruises, never get to find their sea legs, pretty much don't touch water at all their entire careers in the navy unless they request a non-flying u/w tour which is pretty much just to get the sea service ribbon. Even in the USMC, where every marine is a rifleman and marine pilots still get infantry training in TBS, there is no one size fits all "you better blend in" aviator envy with the rest of their branch the way that the army tries to make their aviators lose their own identities. The way the army treats its aviators is definitely unique among the branches.
The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right.
The Air Force also seems to have it out a little bit for the army - I remember when ya'll were going to get those baby hercs (C-27's) back in the late 2000's and an army unit even started training on them in a simulator and took delivery of a few airframes, but the AF came in and pretty much took them from you overnight, arguing to politicians that it was their job to have that role, not yours. That was BS. I'm happy you've gotten a few back recently, after the AF had them for a while and then gave most of them to the USCG. I feel like army aviation is always getting the short end of every stick and it isn't right.
If I remember correctly, the Army COS gave the -27's away in exchange for another ground Combat Brigade, that I am sure has since been stood down. Meh!, no longer my problem or fight.
As I type, my retirement paperwork is making its way through the 7 layers of the candy-cane forest.
Due to the bureaucratic delays in processing said freedom packet, I have made it clear that I myself already 'identify' as a retired soul.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post