Search
Notices
Military Military Aviation

Logging AF time

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2009, 09:24 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,837
Default

Originally Posted by MalteseX View Post
A little "inside" intel.

When I gave interviews:

For heavy guys, everything else being equal (hand carried resume, meeting chief pilot, having inside recommendations etc) 7500 hours is a very "magic" number. The computer would give a max flight time score to military guys with over 7500 hours for a human "look". Civ guys the number is higher. For fighter types, the number is lower but I don't remember what it was. (I'm thinking it was 3500-4000 fighter or trainer hours)

PS for those who don't know. The computer gives a "score" to a resume/application depending upon the quals of the pilot candidate. Education is scored; flight time; jobs held; leadership positions; check airman/stan eval; IP qual; "extra" duties (no kidding) (want a higher score, be a safety officer or teach Instrument refresher courses); schools attended (yes SOS etc COUNTS higher)---at our company, you had to translate the terms to civilian however; Did not understand stan/eval-- had to use Check Airman etc.
Your company did understand that that amount of fighter time is only acheived by a very few - and it is only going to get worse right? At least in my community you would ONLY be seeing retirees and a few special people who were either lucky in the career or had some extra high time year to gain that much experience. Now those who went to the training command would have a greater chance to achieve those types of total times. Right now people getting out with about 10 years of time have around 1500 TT - some are struggling to make those ATP minimums.
Heavy guys......are you guys really getting that much time? WOW!

USMCFLYR
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 02:06 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Giggity's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Posts: 124
Default

Originally Posted by MalteseX View Post
A little "inside" intel.

When I gave interviews:

For heavy guys, everything else being equal (hand carried resume, meeting chief pilot, having inside recommendations etc) 7500 hours is a very "magic" number. The computer would give a max flight time score to military guys with over 7500 hours for a human "look". Civ guys the number is higher. For fighter types, the number is lower but I don't remember what it was. (I'm thinking it was 3500-4000 fighter or trainer hours)

PS for those who don't know. The computer gives a "score" to a resume/application depending upon the quals of the pilot candidate. Education is scored; flight time; jobs held; leadership positions; check airman/stan eval; IP qual; "extra" duties (no kidding) (want a higher score, be a safety officer or teach Instrument refresher courses); schools attended (yes SOS etc COUNTS higher)---at our company, you had to translate the terms to civilian however; Did not understand stan/eval-- had to use Check Airman etc.
There are maybe 5-10 people with that kind of hours in the entire AF.
Giggity is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 02:11 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: DA-40
Posts: 290
Default

Originally Posted by USMCFLYR View Post
Your company did understand that that amount of fighter time is only acheived by a very few - and it is only going to get worse right? At least in my community you would ONLY be seeing retirees and a few special people who were either lucky in the career or had some extra high time year to gain that much experience. Now those who went to the training command would have a greater chance to achieve those types of total times. Right now people getting out with about 10 years of time have around 1500 TT - some are struggling to make those ATP minimums.
Heavy guys......are you guys really getting that much time? WOW!

USMCFLYR
Those were the times to "max" the flight time scoring of the resumes. It wasn't the min. The mins were at least 1500 hours total.

You are right, however. Very few people had those numbers of hours--usually only retirees from days long past.

I wonder what is going to happen (what companies will do) when many guys who have gone to an "unmanned vehicle" assignment for a big portion of their military career, start getting out.
MalteseX is offline  
Old 06-22-2009, 09:12 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KC10 FATboy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Legacy FO
Posts: 4,096
Default

I had over 3500 hours ... and I was very conservative on my time. The current active duty heavy guys are getting more time than I did. For a period of about a year, I was on a desk duty assignement and only flew for currency.
KC10 FATboy is offline  
Old 03-30-2011, 09:57 AM
  #25  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 37
Default

Thread Revival:

I'm updating all my civilian logs with my military time and wanted to see what others are doing.

I've got my UPT time and breakdown via TIMS that has solo T-37/38 time broken down and I've logged that as PIC.

My ARMs and vMPF breakdown only shows my AT-38 time for IFF which I logged as all dual, and my MWS time only shows C or D breakdown. How are guys logging MWS time? I logged all D model time as dual recieved even after the Form 8 and all solo, i.e. C Model time as PIC until B course complete. Does that sound reasonable? Or are guys just taking PAA time and going with that and not bothering with C vs. D time?

Thanks for the inputs

Sledy
sledy is offline  
Old 03-30-2011, 05:46 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 122
Default

Sledy - you getting out? I am counting all my C model and D model time as PIC. Even in the B course you're flying with an IP, so he logs instructor and you log PIC. I flew across the pacific in the d model with the flight doc, but that was rare, normally they'd put some new guy with an IP so they both could log. I'd PM you, but I just got my account.

Good luck!
Billy Pilgrim is offline  
Old 03-30-2011, 06:09 PM
  #27  
China Visa Applicant
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Midfield downwind
Posts: 1,920
Default

Originally Posted by sledy View Post
I've got my UPT time and breakdown via TIMS that has solo T-37/38 time broken down and I've logged that as PIC.

My ARMs and vMPF breakdown only shows my AT-38 time for IFF which I logged as all dual, and my MWS time only shows C or D breakdown. How are guys logging MWS time? I logged all D model time as dual recieved even after the Form 8 and all solo, i.e. C Model time as PIC until B course complete. Does that sound reasonable?
That's exactly how I've logged my fighter/trainer time.
Hacker15e is offline  
Old 03-30-2011, 06:33 PM
  #28  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: G-IV & G-200
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by Billy Pilgrim View Post
...Even in the B course you're flying with an IP, so he logs instructor and you log PIC...
I think you'd probably have a tough time convincing anyone you were the PIC in that situation. "Primary" time isn't necessarily PIC.
bschref is offline  
Old 03-30-2011, 07:27 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Adlerdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 767 Captain
Posts: 3,988
Default

Originally Posted by Billy Pilgrim View Post
Sledy - you getting out? I am counting all my C model and D model time as PIC. Even in the B course you're flying with an IP, so he logs instructor and you log PIC. I flew across the pacific in the d model with the flight doc, but that was rare, normally they'd put some new guy with an IP so they both could log. I'd PM you, but I just got my account.
Originally Posted by Billy Pilgrim View Post

Good luck!


Billy,
There have been lots of threads on this so you may want to use the search function.

I'm assuming you're getting this time sorted out because you're applying to airlines?

You need to be careful about how you present your "family model" time. Many airlines are very specific about what they will accept as PIC time. The most common definition I've seen is that you had to be the one "signing for the aircraft". Basically, that reads you were the one ultimately responsible for the aircraft.
If you flew a B-course sortie in a D-model with an IP on board, you weren't the PIC (remember this has nothing to do with FARs or the military regs).

Keep in mind that many of the airline interviews are conducted by current or former fighter pilots or pilots they’ve tipped off about what to look for. They know you spent your first 6 months flying at the FTU in D-models with IPs on board. They might remember that lots of new guys get a local area fam ride in a D-model w/ an IP when they first get to their first base. They also know about the pond crossing with the new guy and the IP. Basically, they know the guy who shows up claiming 100% (or something close) of their D-model fighter time as PIC is not being truthful.

I would recommend the following:
-Remove any solo UPT time from your PIC total. You weren't a pilot yet and you were basically soloing under the responsibility of your IP and the SOF (remember the solo brief).

-Remove any D-model FTU sorties since you were clearly receiving instruction and the IP had the hammer. If you got a local area check-out at your first operational base in a D-model, I'd toss that too.

-The occasional D-model / IP sortie when you were operational is harder to track. I never kept a logbook, so I couldn’t begin to know which tub sorties had an IP. Those probably won't stand out like the FTU stuff might to a former military fighter guy interviewing you. I've flown plenty of tubs solo.
Note: this assumes you are using your AF records and not some personal logbook to document your military time. An AF flight record entry with a date, tail #, a/c type and flight time is pretty generic. If you have a log book that details you flew a DACT mission in a tub w/ an IP and you count that in your PIC total, you’re setting yourself up for some tough questions.

Good Luck.
Adlerdriver is offline  
Old 03-30-2011, 08:00 PM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
limelight's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: C-17 Everything
Posts: 113
Default

Originally Posted by bschref View Post
I think you'd probably have a tough time convincing anyone you were the PIC in that situation. "Primary" time isn't necessarily PIC.
I agree 100%, good luck explaining your way out of this one in a once in a lifetime interview.
limelight is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
captain_drew
Flight Schools and Training
38
12-05-2012 08:29 AM
HectorD
Flight Schools and Training
27
06-03-2009 03:45 PM
250 or point 65
Flight Schools and Training
6
04-17-2009 09:08 AM
Justin172
Flight Schools and Training
7
02-05-2009 12:03 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Career Questions
4
08-02-2008 02:48 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices