Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Career Builder > Military
Quite a fall from Sec Gates >

Quite a fall from Sec Gates

Notices
Military Military Aviation

Quite a fall from Sec Gates

Old 02-27-2013, 11:00 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
USMCFLYR's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Position: FAA 'Flight Check'
Posts: 13,835
Default

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
From what I can tell the marines attract a different sort of officer. (Understatement of the year.)

That being said I don't think DOD really cares about individual marines (short of those who gave the ultimate). Honestly, how many divorces, troubled dependent children, alcoholics, suicides, etc do the service chiefs really "care" about? It makes them look bad, sure but I never get the impression that they go home worrying about it. I can tell you of guys who went to the boss pleading to not deploy because their wife was ready to leave them and they were ordered out the door, despite having other options. The ORI was coming to town after all and they weren't on "the list"...

I think the point of this though is to say you hate the flag because you look suscpisously at our government and it's leaders is way off base. I think one needs to realize that there are many people in our government who care more about themselves than "the flag" and being upset about that or pointing it out isn't unpatriotic. More towards UnderOvuer than to you.
Maybe that is part of the difference - in at least the way that you and I look at thing then. I don't care what big DOD does. It never affected me anymore than the big pictures politics. I can't influence at that level and world security and world economics filter down and affect my daily lives in ways but I'm not focused and them. What affected me on a daily basis was how my immediate superiors and how my immediate subordinates were affected and I was tried hard to do the best for those I led and I felt at all times (even in my one terrible dysfunctional gun squadron) that I was being taken of on a personal level.

Big DOD (service chiefs since you used them as an example) don't generally care about the individual because they are removed from them. They in turn take care of their immediates and it is suppose to filter down. I want them to make sure that the mechanisms are in place for those problems to be taken care of - and for the problems you listed there are numerous facilities and programs in place to care for the service member.

I remember being in charge of determining the 'list' for deployment. I was also surprised for the million and one reasons people came up with NOT being able to deploy. It is always easy to question the decisions, especially if you are able to sit back without all of the information.

...say you hate the flag because you look suscpisously at our government and it's leaders is way off base.
I sure hope that last statement is more about another poster than myself.
I certainly had my issues with the way things were run, but overall - I definitely think that I had a better experience on active duty than a few others posters on APC and it is NOT indicative of a majority of the people that I came across during my time.
USMCFLYR is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 11:43 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot View Post
There is a great difference between serving under a flag and "for" the politicians
Agreed. For the record, when I talk about service I'm talking about service to the nation, not "for the politicians".

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot View Post
I took an oath and served 22 years; my wife served six. Our loyalty was to our fellow airmen, mission and country - not to any politician.
I understand. And as I have stated (and this is one thing that can never, EVER be repeated enough), human words simply cannot convey the appreciation and gratitude I hold in my soul for men and women such as yourself and your wife...even when I am in disagreement/dislike with them.

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot View Post
I never met a military member or vet who despised the flag.
I wish I could say the same thing. Unlike you, the few I have met could not differentiate between the nation and the politicians. And as for the politicians, there are a few who "served" who I would argue despise the flag enough to throw their fellow servicemen under the bus. Or perhaps it's more accurate to say they are so narcissistic as to only care about themselves such that they were/are readily willing to throw their fellow servicemen under the bus for their own gain, and have. Fortunately for all of us, they are the exception and not the rule. I worry that this is changing, though.

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot View Post
In fact they cherish the thought of (the flag) being folded over their casket some day.
I deeply empathize!! This honor will not be mine to enjoy, loath as I am to admit it. One of the greatest regrets of my life, and always will be. I tired to join up on 3 separate occasions post-9/11...each time the age limit was raised (to my knowledge)...and was always turned down because I was deemed "too old" (the last time by just 4 months). In hindsight I think I should've sued the gov't over it. Imagine...someone suing the gov't in order to join the military voluntarily! Of course, then I would've been labeled "insane" and unfit to serve. And I am not alone. I have the very great honor and privilege to know a former VCSAF. He commented to me, personally, that it was a great shame that "folks like us" (ie. deemed to old to serve) could not join up to augment the services. Past his prime and retired, he would have willingly re-joined as a private to drive supply trucks in Iraq. He is as fine a gentleman and leader as I will ever meet in this lifetime. No doubt some of you served under him. Speaking of...

Originally Posted by Ftrooppilot View Post
I served under the worse SECDEF in history (McNamara) but anticipate that Hagel will be even worse.
Yes. I share that same fear.

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
UnderOveur, you need to realize something that many military members figure out shortly after signing up.

At least in the Air Force, your leadership is largely comprised of careerist "yes men" who will make your life a living hell with no compunction when it means a quicker promotion for themselves.
I do indeed realize and am aware of this. Were I you, I would've put "" marks around the word "leadership", because the kind you speak of is anything BUT authentic leadership. Some branches are worse than others in this regard, and this is getting worse and worse with the passage of time.

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
Then you have a population in the US who have no 'effing clue what is asked for of our men and women in uniform who elect into congress people who also have no idea what it’s like to serve.
Yes. They are called "low information voters", and certain segments of our nation are doing their best to increase their numbers, even while telling them (and the rest of us) the exact opposite.

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
Please look into your academic literature as to how many of our last SecDef's had a single day in uniform.
I am well aware of it. If I got to play dictator for a day, I would make it a law that the SecDef had to have served at one point in his career (and I would be tempted to make it a further requirement that that person had to have been both A) male (representing the majority) and B) a US Marine Corp officer). Speaking of...

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
From what I can tell the marines attract a different sort of officer. (Understatement of the year.)
Indeed they do. My personal and current favorite is Gen. James Mattis. I am deeply saddened that he will retire next month. This is a man who, with multiple stars on his shoulderboard, would go out at 2-3AM and get into foxholes with privates and corporals to get the real scoop of what was happening with the line soldiers. The man embodies authentic leadership at it's finest and highest level, and his enemies fear(ed) him like no other. His retirement will be a great loss to the Marines, the DoD, and our country.

Originally Posted by PasserOGas View Post
I think the point of this though is to say you hate the flag because you look suspiciously at our government and it's leaders is way off base. I think one needs to realize that there are many people in our government who care more about themselves than "the flag" and being upset about that or pointing it out isn't unpatriotic.
That is a darn good point, and I read you loud and clear. I will do my best to remember that. I am in 100% agreement with those who believe that the members of our services have been short-changed by their leadership, both military and especially civilian. It is a very great blessing for those doing the short-changing that I am not and never will be a dictator, because I would not tolerate it for a millisecond and would make of them such an example that others would never dare follow.
UnderOveur is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 12:42 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,068
Default

Why will he be so bad?

I'll give two caveats (opinions) to my question

- There will be significant military cuts regardless of who is in charge

- Anyone who doesn't realize there is an amazing amount of waste in the military clearly has zero knowledge of, or experience with, the military.

I really am curious though, the GOP arguments I heard against him dealt with his previous statements about Iraq, Iran and Israel. None of which seemed that controversial [to me] and beside the point anyway--US Foreign policy isn't dictated by the SecDef.
Sputnik is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 04:33 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirGunner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: King of somewhere hot....
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
Why will he be so bad?

I'll give two caveats (opinions) to my question

- There will be significant military cuts regardless of who is in charge

- Anyone who doesn't realize there is an amazing amount of waste in the military clearly has zero knowledge of, or experience with, the military.
Both valid points, some folks fail to realize that we WILL pull chocks from Afghanistan hence, the level of current manpower, projects, and spending will not be needed. While some say that this will leave us with a hollow force, which it may, the reality is when wars drawdown so does the military.

On your second point, the end of year spending fiasco's that I have seen make me sick to my stomach. There were times my unit didn't have enough funds to buy new flight boots (most of us bought our own anyway, but that's not the point) or gear, but the end of year funds had to be spent on flat screens for the OPS desk...truly sickening...
AirGunner is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:41 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by Sputnik View Post
Why will he be so bad?

I'll give two caveats (opinions) to my question

- There will be significant military cuts regardless of who is in charge

- Anyone who doesn't realize there is an amazing amount of waste in the military clearly has zero knowledge of, or experience with, the military.

I really am curious though, the GOP arguments I heard against him dealt with his previous statements about Iraq, Iran and Israel. None of which seemed that controversial [to me] and beside the point anyway--US Foreign policy isn't dictated by the SecDef.


Mister, you aren't looking for answers. You're looking for an argument. In your own words, none of the GOP concerns in this nomination were controversial to you, and "beside the point anyway". So beyond this response, what is the point in answering a man(?) who already has his mind made up? A: None.

Please do read into this response the same dismissive attitude you brought along with you in your disingenuous post.
UnderOveur is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 06:46 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
UnderOveur's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Holding over Macho Grande
Posts: 602
Default

Originally Posted by AirGunner View Post
the end of year spending fiasco's that I have seen make me sick to my stomach.
They pale in comparison to the outrageous domestic spending and outright illegal refusal to pass a budget by those in control of the Federal gov't.

And anyone who doesn't realize there is an amazing amount of waste outside of the military budget clearly has zero knowledge of, or experience with, the the current US gov't.
UnderOveur is offline  
Old 02-27-2013, 07:48 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AirGunner's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2011
Position: King of somewhere hot....
Posts: 151
Default

Originally Posted by UnderOveur View Post
They pale in comparison to the outrageous domestic spending and outright illegal refusal to pass a budget by those in control of the Federal gov't.
You stole the words right out of my mouth, the level of spending the ENTIRE government has been pursuing is UNSUSTAINABLE and must be curtailed for our survival as a nation.

Originally Posted by UnderOveur View Post
And anyone who doesn't realize there is an amazing amount of waste outside of the military budget clearly has zero knowledge of, or experience with, the the current US gov't.
Agreed wholeheartedly...However, know the audience you "speak" to and try not to make general assumptions, when you load a gunners gun for him, don't complain on what comes down range...
AirGunner is offline  
Old 02-28-2013, 04:05 AM
  #28  
Retired
 
DYNASTY HVY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: whale wrangler
Posts: 3,527
Default

I wonder how many other individuals were offered the position and turned it down ?
Someone who's up to speed on what's going on ie Gen.Mattis or someone else of his caliber might have been better suited and then again they might have turned down the offer of SecDef.

Bit of a read and it speaks volumes in some aspects.
Some of you have read this and some have not so I'll post it again .

General Failure - Baseops Forums

Fred
DYNASTY HVY is offline  
Old 02-28-2013, 06:01 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2007
Position: Petting Zoo
Posts: 2,068
Default

Originally Posted by UnderOveur View Post
Mister, you aren't looking for answers. You're looking for an argument. In your own words, none of the GOP concerns in this nomination were controversial to you, and "beside the point anyway". So beyond this response, what is the point in answering a man(?) who already has his mind made up? A: None.

Please do read into this response the same dismissive attitude you brought along with you in your disingenuous post.
Huh? I'm really failing to communicate. I have no feeling or or against Hagel as SecDef. I'm curious why you think he'll be so bad for the DoD.

I didn't think his comments were controversial--I'm not really seeing how that's "dismissive." Or for that matter "disingenuous." Is it his comments that make you think he'll be a bad SecDef?
Sputnik is offline  
Old 02-28-2013, 06:06 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,007
Default

Rumsfeld worse than McNamara?
Snarge is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jungle
Money Talk
7
01-25-2009 06:02 AM
BankAngle09
Regional
2
07-22-2008 07:46 PM
4 Fan Trashcan
Major
16
04-09-2008 03:06 PM
Av8tor
JetBlue
7
12-26-2005 06:20 AM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-08-2005 09:34 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices