See I think a 15 year captain at NetJets coming into a "leave NetJets" thread on APC when he has no intention of leaving and especially no intention of even comparing NetJets to the thought of leaving, is way more absurd than somebody who worked for NetJets, left, and is commenting on a leave NetJets thread.

Gotta love how you spin things though.

 

You do know, that you can want NetJets to succeed, without wanting the airline industry to fail right? Your immature, bitter nature to the airlines is really silly. Do you think I want NetJets to fail because I am no longer there? Absolutely not...

And you won't be selling 650 shares like hot cakes, NetJets can't give those away. You would think when everyone else is absolutely killing it with growth, revenue, and profits, that NetJets would be doing the same, nope. Frontier made more on baggage fees ALONE than NetJets made in total net. But no, please keep comparing NetJets, who furloughed 20% of their workforce, recalled them 3 years ago and barely turned a profit in 2016 to two companies that have never furloughed and a company that buys their aircraft cash, it's really entertaining to read.

 

You want your perceived manifestation of a future downturn to come true so you can say "see told ya so!" which is quite perverse. Its insane really. And again, here come these pesky old facts again so brace yourself. Written history would disagree with you about NetJets being impervious to economic issues. An economic downturn is more likely than another terrorist attack, and NetJets is in no position to survive another market crash like 2008. So you can compare NetJets to 121 and not all airlines furloughed, but NetJets definitely did.

Management says things like "we aren't planning on furloughing" and "if we hired more we would have to furlough." You don't say those things to the worker bees if your balance sheet is solid. NetJets is on the rebound but they are probably the more vulnerable than they have ever been to any economic issues and clearly there are no plans to expand by management, they aren't able to hire and train, and pad staffing levels for future growth, those signs point to high vulnerability. Not saying there aren't airlines that are operating the exact same way, but you can't act like the NetJets s*&t don't stink.

 

NetJets didn't thrive from a terrorist attack. Did NetJets sell out durin the Oklahoma City bombing? No they didn't. NetJets benefited from the airline industry being severely crippled, nothing more, nothing less. So another airline shattering terrorist attack would benefit NetJets, ok then. How many major terrorist attacks have occurred on US soil versus how many severe economic downturns? You are betting on a terrorist attack to save NetJets? How freaking sick are you?

Yep I was born in 82, and and you were having your parents wipe your ass in 82, you were no more privy to the airline industry than I was so save the jabs. You are proof positive that experience doesn't equal intelligence. NetJets has followed the economic ups and downs just like the 121 industry 2008 proved that. But unlike the airline industry, NetJets still hasn't recovered.

 

Whatever bros. We all have the same goal in mind no matter where we work...Try to stay sane and healthy during the working years, and save enough money to enjoy retirement.

 

Stop taking everything as trash talking. How about you stick to the union MB if you are looking for a circle jerk. This is a thread about LEAVING NETJETS.

If realistic views on a company are not allowed, and that is considered burning bridges, so be it.

 

How does that song go? "Still bats hit crazy after all these years."

 

Guys give it a rest, this thread is becoming like a union message board....

 

Naw, it won't be truly toxic until the Shrub arrives to start pontificating on how right he was, is, and ever shall be....

 

Wait, we have elections in this "union"?

Hahahahahaha!!!