Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Fractional > NetJets
What would it take for you to stay >

What would it take for you to stay

Search
Notices
NetJets Fractional Operator

What would it take for you to stay

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-23-2022, 05:20 PM
  #111  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2022
Posts: 49
Default

Originally Posted by IamGroot View Post
It just seems to be a never ending cycle at NJA.

Things are good, things are ok, things are bad, things might be great…………

It’s crazy how that pros and cons list would have been very similar when I left 5 years ago.

I do 2 week on / 2 weeks off now. Couldn’t t never have imagined that at NJA

Had I been Captain don’t know if I would have tried to get out as much.

It is a good gig.
But with all the other opportunities out there today, not a career destination for the majority.
I get that some love the “romance” of this type of flying,
But there will never be enough to offset all the extra stuff and “drama” that is included in this world for most.

I have had several senior guys ask me about my time there.
Turning 65, not quite ready to be done flying yet.
(No monetary reasons)
After giving them the honest scoop on how days go, it’s a hard pass.
t part of

They flying is the best part of the job at NJ from when the door closes till it opens is great. (Mostly). It’s all the other garbage that we do and ridiculously long duty days to hopefully get some FDP and The Planes Trains and Automobiles crap that make this place suck. Like a wise man once said “this place will always kinda suck”
ExecJet99 is offline  
Old 10-23-2022, 06:29 PM
  #112  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 681
Default

A little piece of information that would have been good to know is that if you get randomly assigned to, let’s say the Sovereign, you have pretty much zero chance of bidding into the right seat of a super-mid like the 350.

What you are told is after your initial lock you can bid into whatever fleet you like, even large cabin since things are really humming along. Trouble is they leave out the part that the right seat in the Latitude, Longitude and the 350 are only given to new hires and there are no open bids for the right seat of those airplanes.

I understand now why the company doesn’t offer open bids into the right seat of those fleets, but it may have affected my decision if I knew that from the beginning. “You might be able to hold captain at the end of your lock.” Maybe, but it will be in the Phenom (which I fit out of) or the XLS or right back into the Sovereign. Anyway, the only way off the Sovereign for me is displacement somewhere around 2028 and I don’t get to pick my fleet then either.

So, if you are randomly assigned the Sovereign or XLS, just be prepared to earn notably less regardless of what schedule you fly and don’t get your heart set on the right seat of a super-mid after your lock is up unless the company puts you there after they start parking sovereigns. Even that’s all up in the air because I keep getting told we are keeping the Sovereign until the wings come off.

As far as upgrade goes I have to wait until I can hold the Latitude. It just would have been nice for QOL and my paycheck if I could wait it out in something other than the Sovereign.
shrsailplanes is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 03:55 AM
  #113  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Poolside
Posts: 534
Default

I would concur that bidding opportunities in the last year or so support this. I assume you were/are not interested in Large Cabin?
Peabody17 is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 04:04 AM
  #114  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 681
Default

Originally Posted by Peabody17 View Post
I would concur that bidding opportunities in the last year or so support this. I assume you were/are not interested in Large Cabin?
I think the assumption by the company is that all new hires want large cabin. That might be true for some, but not all. I would like the 350. It mostly does domestic flying with some international and Hawaii. It’s a comfortable cockpit. I can clean the cabin without hunching over. Baggage is accessible from inside and there is no recessed aisle and the pay is way better. I could hang in that airplane for however long it’s needed to upgrade in the Latitude or even just wait it out until I upgraded in the 350. Either way I really don’t seem to get a choice as an SIC. Seems unfair that QOL and pay between two FO’s of the same seniority and same schedule can be so different based on a decision the company made for me way back in indoc.
shrsailplanes is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 04:30 AM
  #115  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Poolside
Posts: 534
Default

Totally agree!!! It sounds like you and I want exactly the same thing.
Peabody17 is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 05:43 AM
  #116  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2022
Posts: 443
Default

I can’t help but think of “121 stink” after reading some of these as there was a time if you went 121 once you’d never get picked up for a job like this, but the market we have been in for years has made that disappear.
Round Luggage is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 06:02 AM
  #117  
Mmmm wine
 
MinRest's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: A220 FO
Posts: 945
Default

Originally Posted by Round Luggage View Post
I can’t help but think of “121 stink” after reading some of these as there was a time if you went 121 once you’d never get picked up for a job like this, but the market we have been in for years has made that disappear.
I would have to imagine that wet ticket ATPs and R-ATPs would be a better pick up for NJA than any prior 121. It was one thing when regionals were dog crap but as they have had to elevate significantly to attract pilots, there will be less and less that leave regionals for NJA. Those that leave a regional for NJA will more than likely leave NJA for an airline. Then again NJA and regionals will have to take anyone and everyone they can get. 121 stink will exist for NJA as much as they can allow it because prior 121 will leave NJA for a major more than likely.
MinRest is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 06:54 AM
  #118  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 681
Default

Originally Posted by Peabody17 View Post
Totally agree!!! It sounds like you and I want exactly the same thing.
It appears as if NetJets is creating a flow for their SIC’s especially new hire SIC’s. You join the company in the fleet NetJets picks for you, then you bid into large cabin, then you upgrade into what you can hold. If you don’t fit that mold and don’t want large cabin, especially if you are hired into the sovereign, XLS, or even the Phenom, then things get complicated.
shrsailplanes is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 08:08 AM
  #119  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Position: Poolside
Posts: 534
Default

Originally Posted by shrsailplanes View Post
It appears as if NetJets is creating a flow for their SIC’s especially new hire SIC’s. You join the company in the fleet NetJets picks for you, then you bid into large cabin, then you upgrade into what you can hold. If you don’t fit that mold and don’t want large cabin, especially if you are hired into the sovereign, XLS, or even the Phenom, then things get complicated.
I think you give NetJets way too much credit. I don't think they're capable of planning such a flow. While they have control over releasing bids to FO positions on Latitude/Longitude/350 and have lately chosen not to do so, they have released bids on the LC fleets and reluctantly had to waive seat locks to get sufficient bidders. Rumor has it that many "senior" FOs are not bidding for FO positions because they don't want to carry any additional seat-lock into their soon-to-be upgrade. I think this may have merit, but it leaves those of us that don't want the quickest upgrade wanting...

I think the "right thing" to do is that as long as new-hires are being placed into Latitude/Longitude/350, then there should be at least a quarterly seniority bid for FO positions on those fleets, but absent contractual language requiring it, I don't see the company changing course.
Peabody17 is offline  
Old 10-24-2022, 08:53 AM
  #120  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2017
Posts: 681
Default

Originally Posted by Peabody17 View Post
I think you give NetJets way too much credit. I don't think they're capable of planning such a flow. While they have control over releasing bids to FO positions on Latitude/Longitude/350 and have lately chosen not to do so, they have released bids on the LC fleets and reluctantly had to waive seat locks to get sufficient bidders. Rumor has it that many "senior" FOs are not bidding for FO positions because they don't want to carry any additional seat-lock into their soon-to-be upgrade. I think this may have merit, but it leaves those of us that don't want the quickest upgrade wanting...

I think the "right thing" to do is that as long as new-hires are being placed into Latitude/Longitude/350, then there should be at least a quarterly seniority bid for FO positions on those fleets, but absent contractual language requiring it, I don't see the company changing course.
There seems to be a “Changing of the guard.” I think there are still a sprinkling of 15 plus year FO’s and we are now into the 8 year FO’s. I would agree that many of them are staying put waiting for their upgrades. I think it’s the new hires that are being put into this “flow.” SIC’s that are out of their fleet lock and still three plus years from upgrade will have one path really. Large cabin unless they were lucky enough to be placed in a super-mid. They would likely stay put as would I if there was an opportunity.
shrsailplanes is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Aeirum
Regional
98
05-02-2020 04:08 PM
viking1995
Southwest
102
01-22-2020 05:57 AM
Smash312
Aviation Law
37
08-21-2014 07:32 AM
hesitant
Career Questions
3
12-20-2011 12:09 AM
JollyF15
Cargo
74
12-24-2007 07:43 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices