Search

Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

SurfAir

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2012 | 07:05 AM
  #11  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Lindenberg
Has anybody interviewed with them yet?
Waiting to hear back from my resume guru then I'll be sending my stuff in. I'm right about their preferred mins so I'd imagine there's a host of others more qualified than me. But I'm gonna do it anyway (what are they gonna do say no?) and see what happens. With it being a start-up it's probably a bit of a risk but I would be living somewhere other than Ohio, so it seems like an acceptable risk to me.
Reply
Old 05-15-2012 | 07:25 AM
  #12  
USMCFLYR's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 13,843
Likes: 1
From: FAA 'Flight Check'
Default

This part of their website made me chuckle:
--Join the ranks of some of the
finest trained pilots in the industry.
That is a hefty statement, especially when the CA require:
CAPTAINS: Required
-Commercial Pilot
-Instrument Rating

-FAR135 minimums
-1500 TT
and FOs require:
First Officers: Required
-Commercial Pilot
-Instrument Rating
-250TT
I just find it hard to be considered among the "finest trained pilots in the industry" with around 250-500 (preferred) total time in an airplane.

Got to love advertising!

USMCFLYR

Btw - would love to fly the airplane!
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 04:42 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: SA227, left seat
Default

Current mins posted on the website are ATP/2000 preferred CA and 500 FO. Maybe they went up recently? Anyone here anything from them?

Also, it says "Launching 2012" on their website; somewhat vague, and 2012 is quickly coming to an end. If anyone has heard anything, did they give you a date to expect operations to begin?
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 09:09 AM
  #14  
135
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default

I read on one of their social media sites that they are looking at the later part of 2012 for start up.
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 11:19 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: moving along
Default

Would the time be loggable as a FO?
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 06:32 PM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: 1st Class for breafast, lunch, dinner
Default

FO should be SIC
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 07:14 PM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: moving along
Default

yea but the pc12 is a single pilot aircraft
Reply
Old 08-18-2012 | 09:05 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Default

What a joke
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 04:17 AM
  #19  
Ewfflyer's Avatar
Flying Farmer
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,160
Likes: 0
From: Turbo-props' and John Deere's
Default

Originally Posted by jbt1407
Would the time be loggable as a FO?
If their Ops Specs require the SIC, then yes. If it says they are approved for single pilot, and everything is working, then no.

Your next job interview, assuming you leave before you upgrade, will probably question that time and might not count it.
Reply
Old 08-19-2012 | 08:53 PM
  #20  
fjetter's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 810
Likes: 0
From: King Air 200 CA Hawker 800/900 FO
Default

Originally Posted by jbt1407
Would the time be loggable as a FO?
Yes provided they train FOs and have them complete a 135 checkride.

Originally Posted by Ewfflyer
If their Ops Specs require the SIC, then yes. If it says they are approved for single pilot, and everything is working, then no.

Your next job interview, assuming you leave before you upgrade, will probably question that time and might not count it.
Even with A/P in Lieu of SIC you can still log SIC if everything is still working, provided you have a current 135 check. With that ops spec the only time an SIC is required for dispatch is when the A/P is INOP. But they can always dispatch with a SIC and a functioning A/P they just don't have to.
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices