Search
Notices
Part 135 Part 135 commercial operators

Part 135 Cost Structure

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2013, 10:44 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 107
Default Part 135 Cost Structure

Hello all,
I have a "pipe dream" of starting my own part 135 operation. Nothing too fancy just maybe a navajo and a seneca or two. I'm just curious, what factors go into the cost structure of operating a 135. Obviously there's the fixed costs: hangar/facility fees, lease/loan on aircraft, insurance etc. And the variable costs: fuel, maintenance (which could be considered fixed for a few things). Is there anything else?

I figure that maintenance, lets say for a Navajo is roughly $62 ($22/hr for overhaul-$40,000/1800hrs, $3000/100 for 100hr +$10/hr reserve)
Fuel is 24gals avg @ ~$5.25= $126

Then your fixed costs get distributed depending on how much you fly. How many charter operations can fly a piston twin 50 hours a month?
If that's attainable, then 50 hours a month at ~$600/month hangar rental (just a guess) ends up being $12/hr

My question is, for those who have been inside a small part 135, what does insurance end up being? And financing? I realize this may be an impossible question because of the many factors that affect it, but I have nothing to even base a guess off of.

Would a rough estimate of operating costs (Fixed+variable) be around $500-600/hr? That leaves razor thin margins for the administrative costs, pilot pay, etc. How to charter ops. do it?

Thanks for reading
Pony Express is offline  
Old 04-05-2013, 04:04 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
chazbird's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: Fifth floor, window
Posts: 290
Default

Outside of the aircraft operating costs you'll need to budget a lot of time and money upfront. Getting a 135 certificate was never especially easy but now days it'll take at least a year. And that was before the recent sequester - who knows how long it'll take now. Maybe you're better off buying a operator with a certificate.

From my recent exposure to start-up 135's and other 135 small scale charter places (IE piston places) is that some of them sort of don't know how wealthy the wealthy are these days. The potential clients have the $$$, and its for them to charter a King Air vs a Navajo - the money they'd save is a case of really fancy wine, or several bottles of the same at a dinner, well, its nothing to them. And, they know the difference in the airplanes, some of them know what TAWS and other modern safety advancements are.
chazbird is offline  
Old 04-06-2013, 10:13 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 107
Default

Thanks for the reply.

So if cost isn't really a bottom-line consideration, I would imagine equipment and location are? It must be hard for a 135 startup to build a clientele.
Pony Express is offline  
Old 04-07-2013, 11:58 PM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 65
Default

You also have to be good at quoting trips on top of everything else listed. You can easily blow all profit out of the water with a bad quote.
tiredcfi is offline  
Old 04-08-2013, 09:37 AM
  #5  
patience
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,068
Default

Don't forget about training costs.

I don't think you could make enough money to justify an operation with just a couple Navajos.

Are you interested in cargo or charter?
Systemized is offline  
Old 04-08-2013, 10:40 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Buddy of mine owns a single engine 135 operation. Took him a year and a half to get the certificate. When he first approached the FSDO they sat him down for about 2 hours, and basically tried to talk him out of it. After he said he was still in, they were helpful but it still was incredibly difficult.

Read through 135 and look at how much harder multi engine vs single engine is from an operation standpoint. Maint cost per the regs alone are significantly higher than single engine operation. Annual W&B, 100 hour, 50 hour, etc. Direct operating cost is only part of the story. Local operation here has a Seneca II that they have to bill out at over $500/hour. I rarely see that airplane move.
Grumble is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 01:57 AM
  #7  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 9
Default ramblings

A few more thoughts,

You will need to own the airplane first,then get it approved.

Wher are you located? Here in the NE the charter biz is seasonal.

Brokers bring business, but for a piston, I would think not much.

Training is a big expense for our Part 135.

Find some op specs and GOM's and read them too.
BRUCE FANZ is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 09:09 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 107
Default

Are you interested in cargo or charter?
Either really, although I suppose cargo might be a little bit more consistent right?

Read through 135 and look at how much harder multi engine vs single engine is from an operation standpoint. Maint cost per the regs alone are significantly higher than single engine operation. Annual W&B, 100 hour, 50 hour, etc. Direct operating cost is only part of the story. Local operation here has a Seneca II that they have to bill out at over $500/hour. I rarely see that airplane move.
Would the same be true for a turboprop such as a PC-12 vs a King Air? Also what happens if you are based near water and want to fly beyond the gliding distance with a single engine (turbine or piston)? For example in south Florida or maybe New England? I would have thought that (potentially) lower insurance costs on a multi might offset the maintenance savings on a single.

Wher are you located? Here in the NE the charter biz is seasonal.

Brokers bring business, but for a piston, I would think not much.

Training is a big expense for our Part 135.

Find some op specs and GOM's and read them too.
Where in the NE are you located? I learned to fly at a small flight school (based in central CT) that did a lot of charters to Martha's Vineyard, Nantucket, Long Island, etc.

I can imagine that training expenses would add up, but for lets say a 2-3 aircraft/ 4-5 pilot operation with low turnover would it still be as substantial?

Thanks everybody this is a great conversation.
Pony Express is offline  
Old 04-10-2013, 09:33 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2009
Posts: 5,193
Default

Originally Posted by Pony Express View Post
Questions.
eCFR — Code of Federal Regulations
Grumble is offline  
Old 05-03-2013, 05:54 AM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Retired SWA /NOPD. on the sofa looking and bored
Posts: 39
Default

The 24gal. figure are you thinking that is the total fuel burn on a PA-31 or a Pa-34 per hour?
xcop is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lanesuzza
Part 135
84
09-15-2023 08:04 AM
Planespotta
Flight Schools and Training
14
11-26-2013 03:38 PM
EFIS COMP MON
Part 135
23
10-10-2011 09:17 PM
ProceedOnCourse
Hiring News
0
08-18-2009 11:29 AM
maximilian2
Part 135
24
09-15-2008 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices