Search
Notices
Part 91 and Low Time Jump pilots, crop dusting, and other Part 91 jobs

Multi-Engine Time Building

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-06-2011, 06:12 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: C560/G200
Posts: 117
Default

you can also just find a CFII and have him give instrument instruction to you. He then logs Dual given/PIC and you can log Sole man. of controls PIC.

I know this in the low time section but as it was said before, definately over-thinking this.
Scooter74 is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 06:25 AM
  #22  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by flyheavys85 View Post
I guess you've got me on a technicality there: it would still be safety pilot time, but in the hopes of spurning the interest of anyone who might be interested I'd figure I'd ask around (especially as "inexpensive" as it is); but that's not to say it couldn't still be made into, wait for it, quality time... compared to flying around in the pattern all day or taking the foreigner route and snoozing as soon as the hobbs starts ticking.
And that technicality could be all it takes to lose your ticket. So I'd think twice about this.
If you split the costs and are not going some place where you were both going to be going anyway, then you are in violation of the regs and can be busted for it.
If you swap who rents the plane each trip, then you would be close to, but not completely halved, and technically it would be legal. However if someone from the FAA found out what you were doing, or if an interviewer discovered what you were doing, I think they'd probably have issues with it.
Don't just go with the opinions of those who've posted here, contact your FSDO and see what they say. If it's in your favor, you want it in writing.
darkroomsource is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 07:13 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: C560/G200
Posts: 117
Default

Simple answer is just be smart about it. Don't try to "stretch" the regs, but you also don't have to study them for a doctorate.

I can't imagine anyone knowing where the 1/2 of the money came from. I can't imagine anyone from the FSDO really caring enough to find out if you properly divided the costs. They have better things to do then follow around 2 kids to see if the costs are all divided properly.

Now, I am also assuming you are just talking about flying around with one other person, building X-C time. Start loading up the plane with people and it might raise a few eyebrows.
Scooter74 is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 02:15 PM
  #24  
Day puke
 
FlyJSH's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: Out.
Posts: 3,865
Default

Originally Posted by darkroomsource View Post
Don't just go with the opinions of those who've posted here, contact your FSDO and see what they say. If it's in your favor, you want it in writing.
Umm, I am guessing you never actually talked with a government worker. They will never give an answer other than quoting regs, never provide an interpretation (expect in support of a violation), and NEVER put it in writing.

Originally Posted by Scooter74 View Post
I can't imagine anyone knowing where the 1/2 of the money came from. I can't imagine anyone from the FSDO really caring enough to find out if you properly divided the costs. They have better things to do then follow around 2 kids to see if the costs are all divided properly.
Don't be so sure. During a random ramp check, they can (and many do) ask seemingly innocent questions which can get you violated.
FlyJSH is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 07:02 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: C560/G200
Posts: 117
Default

true josh, but you would have to be really silly to say "oh, we are splitting the price of the plane legal or not". I would never engage in "random" chit chat during a ramp check. I also and well aware of what they can and cannot require you to answer without representation. If you even think that the the conversation is heading to "uncharted" territories, I would immediately shut up and contact a lawyer. Might be "jumping the gun" but better safe than sorry! AOPA has a "cheap" plane which would cover these occasions.

That said, I really don't think that there is a reg (well at least I can't think of the specific one) which prohibits spliting the costs of the plane for time building.

The issue is how the time in logged. Safety pilot is legit and legal, a CFII giving instrument is also legal, and a MEI giving dual should be no issue either.

As for the Regionals looking at the logs and saying "?" well that probably really depends on which regional and how bad they need people. As for Corporate, I would be willing to bet that a 100 or so hours wouldn't even raise an eyebrow. That is a legit way to get some time. it is common, and depending how seriously you take it; it can even be considered CRM training. I know i did some time building using a friends twin which I paid for gas only, and worked with another pilot to sharpen my CRM skills while flying to fun and exciting places.
Scooter74 is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 09:23 PM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by FlyJSH View Post
Umm, I am guessing you never actually talked with a government worker. They will never give an answer other than quoting regs, never provide an interpretation (expect in support of a violation), and NEVER put it in writing.
MY POINT EXACTLY.
I was just a bit more sarcastic. Or at least tried to be.
darkroomsource is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 09:26 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2010
Posts: 34
Default

Originally Posted by Scooter74 View Post
true josh, but you would have to be really silly to say "oh, we are splitting the price of the plane legal or not". I would never engage in "random" chit chat during a ramp check. I also and well aware of what they can and cannot require you to answer without representation. If you even think that the the conversation is heading to "uncharted" territories, I would immediately shut up and contact a lawyer. Might be "jumping the gun" but better safe than sorry! AOPA has a "cheap" plane which would cover these occasions.

That said, I really don't think that there is a reg (well at least I can't think of the specific one) which prohibits spliting the costs of the plane for time building.

The issue is how the time in logged. Safety pilot is legit and legal, a CFII giving instrument is also legal, and a MEI giving dual should be no issue either.

As for the Regionals looking at the logs and saying "?" well that probably really depends on which regional and how bad they need people. As for Corporate, I would be willing to bet that a 100 or so hours wouldn't even raise an eyebrow. That is a legit way to get some time. it is common, and depending how seriously you take it; it can even be considered CRM training. I know i did some time building using a friends twin which I paid for gas only, and worked with another pilot to sharpen my CRM skills while flying to fun and exciting places.
Ramp check includes looking at your log books.
Safety pilot can be legit, but not for splitting the cost.
CFII - not sure he can instruct in an ME without MEI.
You only need one FAA examiner to read this thread and ...
darkroomsource is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 09:45 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: CFI/II/MEI
Posts: 481
Default

As Scooter said, don't stretch the regs.

Obviously if you buy a block of 20 hours you both can't log exactly 20 hours. The safety pilot cannot legally log run-ups, take-offs, and landings. So maybe you each end up with about 18-19 hours. Now would the FAA or anyone else find out if you each logged the full 20 hours? Probably not unless something happened to you down the road and they went scouring your logbook to verify times, but if that were to happen I'm sure you'd end up pretty screwed. Probably not worth it for the extra hour or two. Try to make it as 'quality' time as possible. Fly practice approaches and make the best out of the time under the hood.

As for the splitting of the costs, if you were a private pilot taking a friend up for a ride you could charge them their pro rata share of rental/fuel expenses. I don't see why it would be different for a 'friend' you are taking up as a safety pilot, especially if you are switching back and forth between PIC at the controls and safety pilot roles. I wouldn't think two people going flying together and spitting the costs evenly would be considered running a commercial operation that requires a commercial operating certificate since private pilots are allowed to do it. According to that reg, you could technically take a couple buddies in the back seat and all go down to Florida on spring break, and have them help pay up to a quarter of the rental expenses.

There is always the issue of whether a potential employer will except safety pilot time, but that isn't really relevant here. In the event of an accident, you could also run into some insurance problems if the person doing the flying isn't checked out in the aircraft, doesn't meet the insurance requirements, or doesn't have required renter's insurance.
Bellanca is offline  
Old 02-06-2011, 09:50 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: CFI/II/MEI
Posts: 481
Default

Originally Posted by darkroomsource View Post
Ramp check includes looking at your log books.
Safety pilot can be legit, but not for splitting the cost.
CFII - not sure he can instruct in an ME without MEI.
You only need one FAA examiner to read this thread and ...

I've had bad luck with getting picked for ramp checks, but have never had them look at my log books. It has happened to me 3 times in my 278 hours of flying. But they have picked on me for the pettiest of things.
Bellanca is offline  
Old 02-11-2011, 10:50 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Cal Varnson's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by snippercr View Post
Right now we are seeing a drop in minimums actually. This might spur more people to do time building things, especially as multi-engine requirements drop. 500 hours ME I doubt anyone could afford, even if split. However, 100 multi engine split (especially if one already has 30-40) is a bit more manageable. The ATP rule is coming up which will drive minimums back up, but there is still some hiring that will occur between now and then.

We are still struggling with one of the worst recessions in quite a few years, yet already airlines are hiring and lowering their minimums. Eagle originally wanted 1000TT/200ME and they are already down to 800/100. And these are the hours people are getting hired at too (in this case, preferred = competitive)!

My multi is a little higher than most fresh out of training, but still short of the 100 hour mark. Considering once I got the 100 I would be at Eagle's min, it's mighty tempting. Unfortunately at this point in the game, I have a REAL hard time PAYING for hours when eventually I will be PAID to fly. So my morals are keeping me from doing it. Are they keeping me from getting a job? Yes (well I should say meeting the mins). Is this a good or bad thing? I'll let you know in a few years. Stay tuned!
Don't automatically assume that just because you hit the mins that airlines will be knocking at your door. Chances are they won't. Minimums are just that, minimums.
Cal Varnson is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nimdabew
Flight Schools and Training
9
09-14-2010 03:00 PM
Stallog
Career Questions
10
01-15-2010 07:26 PM
u08204
Flight Schools and Training
1
01-10-2008 02:11 PM
Mrsmith42e
Flight Schools and Training
2
05-24-2007 02:46 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices