Multi-Engine Time Building
#41
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: CFI/II/MEI
Posts: 481
Huh? Things that are against the regs that you think are petty? If it is in the regs, it doesn't matter how stupid you think the rules are, they are still against the regs.
And I thought a look at your logbook was a given....
Edit: What on earth have you been doing that you've been ramp checked three times?? I can't say I personally know anyone who has been ramp checked, especially with your time.
And I thought a look at your logbook was a given....
Edit: What on earth have you been doing that you've been ramp checked three times?? I can't say I personally know anyone who has been ramp checked, especially with your time.
Ramp check #1 was the worst. The inspector was checking people coming into the FBO I flew out of. I had about 100TT and I was extremely nervous, and the inspector totally fed off of my nerves. (I have later been told that they assume if someone is nervous they have something to hide.) The plane I was flying had a sketchy past - it was bought at a DEA auction without an airworthiness cert, so it was a 35 year old plane with a new airworthiness cert. So the inspector wanted to see the aircraft logs, which had been 'restarted' at the time of purchase. Everything was legal, just a sketchy past.
When I said petty in my post I was referring to items that have nothing to do with flying. The day before ramp check #1, I had a bad hair dye job and my hair ended up purple. So upon concluding that he couldn't 'bust' me for anything, he berated me for a good 15 minutes about my hair's color and style, and what I was wearing. He said I looked 'unprofessional' - apparently wearing shorts and a tank top on a 100 degree day is inappropriate attire. Next, I made the fatal mistake of cracking a joke, asking him if he was from the Fashion District Standards Office or something. Then, in hope to deflect attention from my failed attempt to inject humor, I asked him if he wanted to see my logbook (I now know to NEVER offer up a logbook), but he said he didn't want to see it and finally let me go.
#2 was at the same place with the same person. I had flown home into a presidential TFR (with permission on a IFR flight plan), there was a provision in the TFR stating that pilots and passengers may be requested to show photo ID upon landing, so this d-bag inspector took it upon himself to go IDing/ramp-checking that day. My hair was back to a normal color and my attire was deemed professional enough to his standards and the ramp check was routine.
Ramp check #3 was another random that I encountered at another airport on a cross country.
Moral of the story is that I don't know why they would care about safety pilot time - as long as everything is done according to the regs. Don't offer more information than they ask for, and for an extra measure don't carry your logbook.
#42
Logging of time
A logbook is a legal document for the FAA but it is also a personal memoir of your flying. The regs say that you can not use certain types of piloting experience towards currency or a rating but it dose not prevent one from logging whatever they want.
Employers often have completely different standards from the FAA when evaluating someone as a potential employee. Some might accept Kingair part 135 SIC while others might not. How and what a person logs is a very personal matter. I have seen people completely falsify their records and others who neglected to log certain experiences that were legal by the FAA, because they though it was not good enough.
In the past falsification of flight times and creative logbook keeping was much more prevalent than it is today. Pilots today can get on to a regional with next to nothing anyway. There is little incentive to falsify. New hire times are so low that the bigger risk is from washing out of the simulator if you do not have basic skills.
In the end it is up to the individual. Logging of questionable flight time might just lead to the career of your dreams or disappointment in the interview. Neglecting to act on every opportunity however could lead to a very respectable career that goes no where. What the future holds and how your logbook will be received by future employers is anyones guess.
Life is risk.
Skyhigh
Employers often have completely different standards from the FAA when evaluating someone as a potential employee. Some might accept Kingair part 135 SIC while others might not. How and what a person logs is a very personal matter. I have seen people completely falsify their records and others who neglected to log certain experiences that were legal by the FAA, because they though it was not good enough.
In the past falsification of flight times and creative logbook keeping was much more prevalent than it is today. Pilots today can get on to a regional with next to nothing anyway. There is little incentive to falsify. New hire times are so low that the bigger risk is from washing out of the simulator if you do not have basic skills.
In the end it is up to the individual. Logging of questionable flight time might just lead to the career of your dreams or disappointment in the interview. Neglecting to act on every opportunity however could lead to a very respectable career that goes no where. What the future holds and how your logbook will be received by future employers is anyones guess.
Life is risk.
Skyhigh
#43
Two things.
First, any ALL ATPers out there? My understanding is that the 50 hours of cross country you get is primarily ferrying Seminoles between bases and you do it with another pilot and you both log PIC with one acting as the safety pilot and the other under the hood. Never flew there, just curious if that is right.
Second, Executive Jet Management used to tell us they had the letter from the FSDO, and I know corporate pilots who did this, allowing both type rated pilots in the jet to log PIC simultaneously. We didn't do that at my operation and wasn't sure how it'd work but I don't doubt their FSDO may have signed off on it or the FAA at large. Didn't care because it wasn't an issue.
But even if we had when reporting your time to someone like Delta they're view of who was PIC was solely who was most in charge regardless of which seat the pilot sat in. Another words, if you jump in the right seat as the Chief Pilot and the SIC takes the left seat and commands the flight, in their view the Chief Pilot is most responsible and still PIC. That's a corporate HR decision and they can splice it however they wish. I think JB still doesn't count B1900D PIC as turbine PIC for their purposes.
First, any ALL ATPers out there? My understanding is that the 50 hours of cross country you get is primarily ferrying Seminoles between bases and you do it with another pilot and you both log PIC with one acting as the safety pilot and the other under the hood. Never flew there, just curious if that is right.
165 Hours Multi-Engine Time
* 65 Hours Multi-Engine Instruction & Flight Checks
* 50 Hours Multi-Engine Cross-Country
* 50 Hours Multi-Engine FTD
* 65 Hours Multi-Engine Instruction & Flight Checks
* 50 Hours Multi-Engine Cross-Country
* 50 Hours Multi-Engine FTD
But even if we had when reporting your time to someone like Delta they're view of who was PIC was solely who was most in charge regardless of which seat the pilot sat in. Another words, if you jump in the right seat as the Chief Pilot and the SIC takes the left seat and commands the flight, in their view the Chief Pilot is most responsible and still PIC. That's a corporate HR decision and they can splice it however they wish. I think JB still doesn't count B1900D PIC as turbine PIC for their purposes.
#44
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,282
Right now we are seeing a drop in minimums actually. This might spur more people to do time building things, especially as multi-engine requirements drop. 500 hours ME I doubt anyone could afford, even if split. However, 100 multi engine split (especially if one already has 30-40) is a bit more manageable. The ATP rule is coming up which will drive minimums back up, but there is still some hiring that will occur between now and then.
We are still struggling with one of the worst recessions in quite a few years, yet already airlines are hiring and lowering their minimums. Eagle originally wanted 1000TT/200ME and they are already down to 800/100. And these are the hours people are getting hired at too (in this case, preferred = competitive)!
My multi is a little higher than most fresh out of training, but still short of the 100 hour mark. Considering once I got the 100 I would be at Eagle's min, it's mighty tempting. Unfortunately at this point in the game, I have a REAL hard time PAYING for hours when eventually I will be PAID to fly. So my morals are keeping me from doing it. Are they keeping me from getting a job? Yes (well I should say meeting the mins). Is this a good or bad thing? I'll let you know in a few years. Stay tuned!
We are still struggling with one of the worst recessions in quite a few years, yet already airlines are hiring and lowering their minimums. Eagle originally wanted 1000TT/200ME and they are already down to 800/100. And these are the hours people are getting hired at too (in this case, preferred = competitive)!
My multi is a little higher than most fresh out of training, but still short of the 100 hour mark. Considering once I got the 100 I would be at Eagle's min, it's mighty tempting. Unfortunately at this point in the game, I have a REAL hard time PAYING for hours when eventually I will be PAID to fly. So my morals are keeping me from doing it. Are they keeping me from getting a job? Yes (well I should say meeting the mins). Is this a good or bad thing? I'll let you know in a few years. Stay tuned!
I got hired at ExpressJet with 100.3 hours of multi time. They didn't ask anything about it... I met their mins.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post