Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional > Piedmont Airlines
Where are new hires going CLT or PHL? >

Where are new hires going CLT or PHL?

Search
Notices
Piedmont Airlines Regional Airline

Where are new hires going CLT or PHL?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2022, 11:54 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 174
Default

Originally Posted by CanadianFlyer View Post
Piedmont is stable. We are the most reliable airline in the AA portfolio and AA loves that. Air Wisconsin could be in trouble, but they share a similar great work ethic as Piedmont pilots and will always be welcome here.
i used to think that air whisky was in trouble and the next to go… till I learned they invested 125 million into us airways back in 05 to bail them out. Apparently something similar happened with United in somewhat more recent history too. The three private owners are quite wealthy and while the long term use of the 200 is in question, they’re still flush with cash.

but who really knows in these crazy times?
Urban achiever is offline  
Old 02-06-2022, 07:58 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 366
Default

Originally Posted by CanadianFlyer View Post
Piedmont is stable. We are the most reliable airline in the AA portfolio and AA loves that. Air Wisconsin could be in trouble, but they share a similar great work ethic as Piedmont pilots and will always be welcome here.

Not sure if I would call Piedmont stable. During peak covid in 2020 there were serious talks about Piedmont closing up shop and going by the way side just like TSA, Compass, and xjet did.

PDT was able to avoid furloughs and limp along by kicking the can down the road through some creative financing and cost saving strategies. However, have things really improved since 2020? If anything, you can argue that it’s worse overall now for the whole airline.

Covid in a way kind of saved Piedmont, or at least extended its life a bit. But “normal” times are slowly returning. Attrition is only picking up, PDT has told AA that it can’t accept the flying AA wants it to do simply because of staffing. New hires are not exactly lining up out the door to work at PDT…for obvious QOL reasons. Piedmont stable? I would not bet on that.
CADR is offline  
Old 02-06-2022, 08:55 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2015
Posts: 634
Default

Originally Posted by CADR View Post
. However, have things really improved since 2020? If anything, you can argue that it’s worse overall now for the whole airline.
.
Pure brilliance
Wink is offline  
Old 02-06-2022, 09:31 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,919
Default

The 50 seat RJ's are going away, there's just not enough pilots to fly them. I suspect Piedmont will be folded into the other Wholly Owned Airlines at AA and the pilots offered jobs at those, unless Piedmont has strong enough Scope language in their contract to require a merger of seniority lists. Alternately some 70+ seat jets could be assigned to Piedmont and replace the 50 seaters but that's a lot of training events.
AirBear is offline  
Old 02-07-2022, 08:43 AM
  #25  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,945
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear View Post
The 50 seat RJ's are going away, there's just not enough pilots to fly them. I suspect Piedmont will be folded into the other Wholly Owned Airlines at AA and the pilots offered jobs at those, unless Piedmont has strong enough Scope language in their contract to require a merger of seniority lists. Alternately some 70+ seat jets could be assigned to Piedmont and replace the 50 seaters but that's a lot of training events.
My crystal ball says all 3 WO subsidiaries of AA will merge into 1. Most of the 50 seaters will be parked. Flying will be upgauged. 50–>76, 76–>mainline narrow body. All with less frequency or with milk can runs with the pre-RJ model.

Alternatively, to keep attrition to manageable levels, they may also staple the WO pilots to the main line seniority list. Pay for 76 will be existing Group I rates, less that mainline narrow body Group II rates. Cannot say what 50 seat rates will be, Group I or something somewhat less. This will fix the RJ Captain shortfall. Mainline narrow body FO will be willing to fly as a 76 CA for a couple of years, with a slightly higher rate than Group II FO.
TransWorld is offline  
Old 02-08-2022, 03:50 AM
  #26  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Position: 135 F/O
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post

Alternatively, to keep attrition to manageable levels, they may also staple the WO pilots to the main line seniority list.
Maybe part of the reason for accelerated meetings with Aa’s union? If their regional level crumbles AA will have a rough time ahead. (It is).
QuebOLimaJet is offline  
Old 02-08-2022, 09:57 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,919
Default

Originally Posted by TransWorld View Post
My crystal ball says all 3 WO subsidiaries of AA will merge into 1. Most of the 50 seaters will be parked. Flying will be upgauged. 50–>76, 76–>mainline narrow body. All with less frequency or with milk can runs with the pre-RJ model.

Alternatively, to keep attrition to manageable levels, they may also staple the WO pilots to the main line seniority list. Pay for 76 will be existing Group I rates, less that mainline narrow body Group II rates. Cannot say what 50 seat rates will be, Group I or something somewhat less. This will fix the RJ Captain shortfall. Mainline narrow body FO will be willing to fly as a 76 CA for a couple of years, with a slightly higher rate than Group II FO.
I agree that the only viable long term solution is putting regional pilots on the mainline seniority list. You've got to make it attractive enough that prospective pilots will spend all the $$$ required to get their ratings.

Alternatively, I could see a full scholarship program for pilots after they get their PPL. Once they reach 1500 hours they go fly for a regional for X number of years to pay back the scholarship while holding a mainline seniority number. Alternate to holding the seniority number would be credit for years of service at the regional so they'd start at the same years of service mainline payscale they had at the regional. So they know they have a mainline job coming (assuming furloughs aren't happening) and will be making a good salary. It'd have to be a guaranteed hire short of making a major screwup at the regional.
AirBear is offline  
Old 02-08-2022, 03:33 PM
  #28  
Gets Everyday Off
 
TransWorld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2016
Position: Relaxed
Posts: 6,945
Default

I think scholarships to 1500, and a tie to a mainline is a very viable help. Didn’t Lufthansa do something like that?
TransWorld is offline  
Old 02-12-2022, 08:20 PM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2021
Posts: 100
Default

There is always the possibility of AA declaring bankruptcy and ditching everything while closing up one or more of the WO…
awaywego is offline  
Old 02-14-2022, 03:47 AM
  #30  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Position: 135 F/O
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by awaywego View Post
There is always the possibility of AA declaring bankruptcy and ditching everything while closing up one or more of the WO…
A good reason to leave before the flow.
QuebOLimaJet is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ZeroTT
PSA Airlines
52
11-30-2019 11:07 AM
Zezima
American
9
08-27-2019 07:19 AM
trawkins
PSA Airlines
13
07-29-2019 06:30 PM
DreamCatcher
PSA Airlines
19
05-22-2019 09:28 AM
scubadiver
Piedmont Airlines
31
01-25-2019 08:03 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices