Neuropsychological Evaluation
#11
I got referred by my airline for a single fatigue call months ago....(which I question the legality of).......was sent to a local psychiatrist for a fitness for duty evaluation (not an AME btw)........6 weeks ago........it was zero testing, a 4 hour interview about my whole life, career, family, the fatigue event (which this guy didn’t seem to grasp at all)........so there.......100% discretions of airline who you get referred to....or however your CBA reads about fitness for duty....
#12
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,666
He isn’t talking about an FAA neurocognitive evaluation, he’s talking about a neuropsychological fitness for duty exam.
https://wexnermedical.osu.edu/mental...al-evaluations
https://wexnermedical.osu.edu/mental...al-evaluations
#13
This was a company directed occupational fitness for duty exam. That there should be some overlapping in the testing between what the FAA would request on a neuropsychological exam and what the company would mandate certainly isn’t surprising.
But all the more reason why the content of the exam, the decision mechanism for who could perform it, and the confidentiality of the medical information produced should all be negotiated in the contract.
#14
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: Retired NJA & AA
Posts: 1,918
Dang, my memory sucks, always has. I'd flunk that test bigtime most likely. I'd never make it on the old "Match Game". But I flew recreationally from 17-23 and professionally from age 24 to 60 with no issues. Now my wife is convinced I have ADD, but I think what I have is SADD (Selective Attention Deficit Disorder)
#15
Dang, my memory sucks, always has. I'd flunk that test bigtime most likely. I'd never make it on the old "Match Game". But I flew recreationally from 17-23 and professionally from age 24 to 60 with no issues. Now my wife is convinced I have ADD, but I think what I have is SADD (Selective Attention Deficit Disorder)
#16
New Hire
Joined APC: Oct 2019
Position: HIMS Neuropsychologist
Posts: 1
Neuropsychological evaluation
Hi, i am one of the neuropsychologist who perform the exams. I know pilots like to prepare for EVERYTHING but you really can not, nor do you need to prepare for one of these examination. I tell people it is like studying for a urine test, if everything is OK, it will just work and if not there is not much you can do to fix it before the exam. Best advice is get a good nights sleep and try to not be overly anxious. If you can, spend some time talking to the doctor about the evaluation so you will know what to expect. The exam is really just testing everything your brain does, which is why it takes so long.
#17
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jan 2016
Position: Boeing FO
Posts: 37
I would have been much less anxious if I could have read a report like I posted beforehand. And yes, there’s not much prep that can be done other than what I said, i.e. the number string recall, math in your head and some Luminosity games-some of which were very similar to what I endured.
I guess the test administrators don’t want prep done so as not to skew the results....but being anxious about losing you’re career and livelihood can skew it as well.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I guess the test administrators don’t want prep done so as not to skew the results....but being anxious about losing you’re career and livelihood can skew it as well.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
#19
Even if you do get access, unless the ‘expert witness’ changes their opinion all you can really do is have another ‘expert witness’ either review the testing or redo the testing since even you disagreeing with the test results or opinion will have no legal weight.
Which is why the union contract ought to negotiate a mechanism to insure that fitness for duty exams are done by a mutually agreed upon disinterested expert and that provision is made for a second opinion in the event of disputes. Unfortunately too few pilot unions pay any attention to this essentially granting carte blanche to the HR types to use providers and procedures favorable to them.
This will give you an idea of the FFD process:
https://www.theiacp.org/sites/defaul...aluation_0.pdf
#20
If it’s a fitness for duty exam, it generally is. It depends on the law in your state. Generally the employer does not get the results of the testing, merely the opinion of the examiner that the examiner is either fit for duty, fit for duty with restrictions, or unfit for duty. Some states require the examinee be given access to the actual testing results by the examiner, most do not but only require the examiner get the same limited information (fit/fit with restrictions/unfit) the employer gets. Some don’t even require the examinee to get that, and unless you legally challenge and depose the examiner you may never get access.
Even if you do get access, unless the ‘expert witness’ changes their opinion all you can really do is have another ‘expert witness’ either review the testing or redo the testing since even you disagreeing with the test results or opinion will have no legal weight.
Which is why the union contract ought to negotiate a mechanism to insure that fitness for duty exams are done by a mutually agreed upon disinterested expert and that provision is made for a second opinion in the event of disputes. Unfortunately too few pilot unions pay any attention to this essentially granting carte blanche to the HR types to use providers and procedures favorable to them.
This will give you an idea of the FFD process:
https://www.theiacp.org/sites/defaul...aluation_0.pdf
Even if you do get access, unless the ‘expert witness’ changes their opinion all you can really do is have another ‘expert witness’ either review the testing or redo the testing since even you disagreeing with the test results or opinion will have no legal weight.
Which is why the union contract ought to negotiate a mechanism to insure that fitness for duty exams are done by a mutually agreed upon disinterested expert and that provision is made for a second opinion in the event of disputes. Unfortunately too few pilot unions pay any attention to this essentially granting carte blanche to the HR types to use providers and procedures favorable to them.
This will give you an idea of the FFD process:
https://www.theiacp.org/sites/defaul...aluation_0.pdf
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post