Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Pilot Health
Neuropsychological Evaluation >

Neuropsychological Evaluation


Notices
Pilot Health FAA medical; health topics

Neuropsychological Evaluation

Old 10-12-2019 | 01:47 PM
  #11  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Fifi
I got referred by my airline for a single fatigue call months ago....(which I question the legality of).......was sent to a local psychiatrist for a fitness for duty evaluation (not an AME btw)........6 weeks ago........it was zero testing, a 4 hour interview about my whole life, career, family, the fatigue event (which this guy didn’t seem to grasp at all)........so there.......100% discretions of airline who you get referred to....or however your CBA reads about fitness for duty....
Sounds like pilot pushing to me. ASAP that crap, and write your Congress critter.
Reply
Old 10-13-2019 | 03:17 AM
  #12  
Line Holder
10 Years
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,674
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
He isn’t talking about an FAA neurocognitive evaluation, he’s talking about a neuropsychological fitness for duty exam.

https://wexnermedical.osu.edu/mental...al-evaluations
Turns out he was talking about a FAA neuropsych eval like I linked to.
Reply
Old 10-13-2019 | 08:08 AM
  #13  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,244
Likes: 256
Default

Originally Posted by Xdashdriver
Turns out he was talking about a FAA neuropsych eval like I linked to.
Do you have a difficult time admitting when you are wrong? FAA exams do not “go right to the company.” That would be a violation of federal law.

This was a company directed occupational fitness for duty exam. That there should be some overlapping in the testing between what the FAA would request on a neuropsychological exam and what the company would mandate certainly isn’t surprising.

But all the more reason why the content of the exam, the decision mechanism for who could perform it, and the confidentiality of the medical information produced should all be negotiated in the contract.
Reply
Old 10-15-2019 | 08:56 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,014
Likes: 1
From: Retired NJA & AA
Default

Dang, my memory sucks, always has. I'd flunk that test bigtime most likely. I'd never make it on the old "Match Game". But I flew recreationally from 17-23 and professionally from age 24 to 60 with no issues. Now my wife is convinced I have ADD, but I think what I have is SADD (Selective Attention Deficit Disorder)
Reply
Old 10-16-2019 | 07:58 AM
  #15  
tomgoodman's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 6,248
Likes: 0
From: 767A (Ret)
Default

Originally Posted by AirBear
Dang, my memory sucks, always has. I'd flunk that test bigtime most likely. I'd never make it on the old "Match Game". But I flew recreationally from 17-23 and professionally from age 24 to 60 with no issues. Now my wife is convinced I have ADD, but I think what I have is SADD (Selective Attention Deficit Disorder)
Memory is overrated. Nothing happens twice in exactly the same way, so you might as well start each day with a blank slate.
Reply
Old 10-16-2019 | 09:01 AM
  #16  
New Hire
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: HIMS Neuropsychologist
Default Neuropsychological evaluation

Hi, i am one of the neuropsychologist who perform the exams. I know pilots like to prepare for EVERYTHING but you really can not, nor do you need to prepare for one of these examination. I tell people it is like studying for a urine test, if everything is OK, it will just work and if not there is not much you can do to fix it before the exam. Best advice is get a good nights sleep and try to not be overly anxious. If you can, spend some time talking to the doctor about the evaluation so you will know what to expect. The exam is really just testing everything your brain does, which is why it takes so long.
Reply
Old 10-16-2019 | 05:31 PM
  #17  
Thread Starter
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: Boeing FO
Default

I would have been much less anxious if I could have read a report like I posted beforehand. And yes, there’s not much prep that can be done other than what I said, i.e. the number string recall, math in your head and some Luminosity games-some of which were very similar to what I endured.

I guess the test administrators don’t want prep done so as not to skew the results....but being anxious about losing you’re career and livelihood can skew it as well.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Reply
Old 10-23-2019 | 08:00 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Default

Is it legal to be given company mandated medical testing and then not to be given the results?
Reply
Old 10-23-2019 | 08:30 PM
  #19  
Excargodog's Avatar
Perennial Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 14,244
Likes: 256
Default

Originally Posted by deftone
Is it legal to be given company mandated medical testing and then not to be given the results?
If it’s a fitness for duty exam, it generally is. It depends on the law in your state. Generally the employer does not get the results of the testing, merely the opinion of the examiner that the examiner is either fit for duty, fit for duty with restrictions, or unfit for duty. Some states require the examinee be given access to the actual testing results by the examiner, most do not but only require the examiner get the same limited information (fit/fit with restrictions/unfit) the employer gets. Some don’t even require the examinee to get that, and unless you legally challenge and depose the examiner you may never get access.

Even if you do get access, unless the ‘expert witness’ changes their opinion all you can really do is have another ‘expert witness’ either review the testing or redo the testing since even you disagreeing with the test results or opinion will have no legal weight.

Which is why the union contract ought to negotiate a mechanism to insure that fitness for duty exams are done by a mutually agreed upon disinterested expert and that provision is made for a second opinion in the event of disputes. Unfortunately too few pilot unions pay any attention to this essentially granting carte blanche to the HR types to use providers and procedures favorable to them.

This will give you an idea of the FFD process:

https://www.theiacp.org/sites/defaul...aluation_0.pdf
Reply
Old 10-24-2019 | 06:56 AM
  #20  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,120
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog
If it’s a fitness for duty exam, it generally is. It depends on the law in your state. Generally the employer does not get the results of the testing, merely the opinion of the examiner that the examiner is either fit for duty, fit for duty with restrictions, or unfit for duty. Some states require the examinee be given access to the actual testing results by the examiner, most do not but only require the examiner get the same limited information (fit/fit with restrictions/unfit) the employer gets. Some don’t even require the examinee to get that, and unless you legally challenge and depose the examiner you may never get access.

Even if you do get access, unless the ‘expert witness’ changes their opinion all you can really do is have another ‘expert witness’ either review the testing or redo the testing since even you disagreeing with the test results or opinion will have no legal weight.

Which is why the union contract ought to negotiate a mechanism to insure that fitness for duty exams are done by a mutually agreed upon disinterested expert and that provision is made for a second opinion in the event of disputes. Unfortunately too few pilot unions pay any attention to this essentially granting carte blanche to the HR types to use providers and procedures favorable to them.

This will give you an idea of the FFD process:

https://www.theiacp.org/sites/defaul...aluation_0.pdf
As a union member, I don't think I want to spend negotiating capital trying to protect job applicants, in fact it might be in my best interest if the company is as selective as the law (and the market) permits. Anything relevant to someone on property is different of course.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wtsFLYBOY
Pilot Health
2
09-22-2018 11:27 AM
pilotturnedSW
Pilot Health
6
10-10-2011 07:41 AM
bsh932
Regional
12
11-09-2007 06:26 PM
fatlazypilot
Pilot Health
35
02-09-2007 06:39 PM
Freightpuppy
Cargo
22
01-13-2007 06:33 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices