![]() |
Originally Posted by Jdj10
(Post 3216584)
I could end up eating my words, but I doubt that Dion would have said we are not opening any bases if it were in the plans in the near future. Otherwise, no one would ever believe anything he says in the future. He probably would have deflected or danced around the question if that were the case. Just a guess. I would think the more likely reason for hiring is attrition, combined with some relaxing of scope for the next year. As a result, more regional flying...
|
Originally Posted by Phlflyer
(Post 3216526)
So I’m starting to hear rumors about growth and DFW opening very soon. Anyone hearing this too?
|
Originally Posted by pangolin
(Post 3216707)
Heavy PSA presence last summer in DFW. I expect the same this year. Mesa can’t fly what they have now so someone will have to fill the gap.
|
Mesa’s performance is bad. But it’s been bad for years. There is a reason they’re cheap and their labor contracts are only a piece of that equation. I’m not trying to tear them down, they have good ALPA Pilot’s over there who are doing the same thing we’re doing... Trying to pay the bills.
Anyway... If DFW happens it would likely be at the expense of PSA flying somewhere else. There really isn’t any clear way for PSA to grow right now. |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3216748)
Mesa’s performance is bad. But it’s been bad for years. There is a reason they’re cheap and their labor contracts are only a piece of that equation. I’m not trying to tear them down, they have good ALPA Pilot’s over there who are doing the same thing we’re doing... Trying to pay the bills.
Anyway... If DFW happens it would likely be at the expense of PSA flying somewhere else. There really isn’t any clear way for PSA to grow right now. It doesn't make any sense as to why we're pushing through 2 classes a month of 30 each if we're not growing. I get it that some of the hiring is due to attrition, but we didn't lose 600 pilots. |
The question to “more airplanes” is from where
|
Originally Posted by Baldheadedman66
(Post 3216786)
But didn't you say a few months ago that you see us growing and getting more airplanes?
It doesn't make any sense as to why we're pushing through 2 classes a month of 30 each if we're not growing. I get it that some of the hiring is due to attrition, but we didn't lose 600 pilots. |
Originally Posted by Swakid8
(Post 3216855)
Chris has never eluded to PSA getting more planes. He has always stuck to his point. The other question you have to ask is where will PSA get planes from to grow? CRJ production has ended, there are many used 700/900s floating around. The possibility was there for growth until CRJ production ended and MESA contract was renewed...
|
Originally Posted by Baldheadedman66
(Post 3216786)
But didn't you say a few months ago that you see us growing and getting more airplanes?
It doesn't make any sense as to why we're pushing through 2 classes a month of 30 each if we're not growing. I get it that some of the hiring is due to attrition, but we didn't lose 600 pilots. Maybe we would have gained some aircraft if we were able to gain additional block hours. That hasn’t happened yet. Maybe they figure it out in the future, maybe they don’t. But for now I don’t see much changing. I see AA restructuring some as they begin their recovery. What that looks like I have no idea. But they will place flying/airplanes at the carriers who are able to be flexible and respond quickly/efficiently to AA’s changing needs in a rapidly changing market. Not so sure PSA is able to be that airline for AA for a number of reasons that are far outside our control. So no sense worrying about any of it. |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3216826)
The question to “more airplanes” is from where
filler |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:18 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands