Search

Notices
PSA Airlines Regional Airline

PSA/PDT merger...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-18-2010 | 03:16 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Ask scheduling
Default PSA/PDT merger...

Haven't heard much about this in a while from the PSA side. Anyone have anything to offer ie: good, bad, he said, she said?
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 03:34 AM
  #2  
stoki's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
From: bar stool
Default

"Haven't heard much about this in a while from the PSA side."

Might be because it's not happening.
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 04:46 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Default

PSA would fight this as much as possible. Their #1 pilot would be #20 on our list. PDT has too many old people who have been here way to long.
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 05:25 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Default

yea i would love to see one of those mdt pdt cpts try the dash chop n drop into phl in a rj, he would be all "hrmmmm, might not get down in time"
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 06:05 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by dashtrash300
PSA would fight this as much as possible. Their #1 pilot would be #20 on our list. PDT has too many old people who have been here way to long.
That would be assuming straight DOH on the list.... Plus we have our own share of 20 plus year Captains. Maybe not as OLD as PDT but we have enough. With that, why would they ever merge? Different planes, different bases, different pay, just a whole different animal.... THE only link is we are both wholly owns.... However it would appear to benefit only Mainline by saving them a few dollars..... I will say that from a Junior FO stand point, I'd be all for it as long as no additional furloughs happend. I would have a lot more FO's below me and have a better QOL in general.

However, I do not see as to why anyone would think this would happen. Headquarters are different, higher ups would be against it, etc... The list just continues. I think the one thing that might be common is you gave us that lovely KH man.... In which when you want him back, you can have him! Please take him back.....
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 06:15 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 936
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by meyers9163
That would be assuming straight DOH on the list.... Plus we have our own share of 20 plus year Captains. Maybe not as OLD as PDT but we have enough. With that, why would they ever merge? Different planes, different bases, different pay, just a whole different animal.... THE only link is we are both wholly owns.... However it would appear to benefit only Mainline by saving them a few dollars..... I will say that from a Junior FO stand point, I'd be all for it as long as no additional furloughs happend. I would have a lot more FO's below me and have a better QOL in general.

However, I do not see as to why anyone would think this would happen. Headquarters are different, higher ups would be against it, etc... The list just continues. I think the one thing that might be common is you gave us that lovely KH man.... In which when you want him back, you can have him! Please take him back.....
Well we do have the small jet rates already in our contract
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 06:26 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: B737 F/O
Default

Also I know PDT's training is categorized as an AQP program, but I'm not sure if PSA's is as well. Not a big thing, (both get the job done), but with Fed-red tape, who knows how you could operate the DH8 side as AQP and the CRJ as a normal training program without the FAA wanting it standardized.

Blue Streak folks please correct me if I've said anything inaccurate about PSA.......
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 08:09 AM
  #8  
piper338's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 408
Likes: 0
Default

This might sounds crazy... but hell.. lets support a merge and turn the tables a bit instead of putting pilot jobs on the line lets put management positions on the line. Maybe force some of the people in SBY to attempt to do something. GO right to PHX with it 1 new management 1 new training program gotta cost less than 2
Reply
Old 02-18-2010 | 09:55 AM
  #9  
Colnago's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 711
Likes: 0
Default

I really hate these misleading titles. Of course, I've come to expect that if someone states "A/B merger" in their title, it's only speculation.
Reply
Old 02-21-2010 | 10:27 AM
  #10  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
From: Ask scheduling
Default

I think something's up. From what I've heard, contract negotiations at PSA has gone much better than here at PDT. Our CEO is on the brink of retirement and our fleet should have been taken out to the pasture and shot years ago. I think something is on the burner. I have a feeling that once PSA signs their contract, we might here somethng. If we do merge, I think it will be under the PSA contract because it is much cheaper with worse work rules than ours. I think the merger would be a good thing. I know PSA guys would get slammed with senority issues and some are afraid to have a turboprop that close to them, but if PHX opens up and PDT/PSA goes out there then it's a win win for everyone. With the three hub bases, commuting would be a lot easier, especially if you live on the west coast. Hopefully someday we can get rid of the contract carriers, have one wholly owned do all the express flying then life might get better for everyone. Just my opinion.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
texaspilot76
Major
111
09-11-2009 12:58 PM
flyguy1
Mergers and Acquisitions
5
04-01-2009 03:32 AM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
Sir James
Major
0
03-15-2005 08:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices