PSA currently has about 35 200's. Personally I would be very happy if we parked every one of them. If, and that is a big if, PSA decided to exercise the option of all 40 of the 900's, this would be a better place.

Yes I am. See my first post in this thread. "THEY are liars and THEY know it".

Who said? Recruiters? Well in that case mark the calendar.

Something not completely negative about PSA?!?!?

http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/...03_964x531.jpg

That is some pretty funny stuff.

PSAs 200s are some of the newest in operation for AAG.

Negative. People that work there.

Don't believe a word they say. They are desperate to fill the right seat behind all the other pilots waiting to upgrade. Assume all of the 50 seat aircraft will be parked and go from there. There are only a few pure 76 seat aircraft regionals out there that don't have to park any 50 seat aircraft and even at those, most have missed the boat. PSA just has 50 seat aircraft that will be parked, making their seniority gain slower.

Holy crap. All these years I have been listening to people that actually work at PSA. Now I realize I should be listening to this clown. I better sit by the T.V. and wait for the big announcement on CNN or Fox news that we are parking our 50 seat aircraft. Who wants to come over and wait with me???

Ask someone at piedmont or envoy how long the "they're painting it so we're keeping it forever" insurance plan held up on the soon to be parked aircraft.