Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
CommutAir vs  ExpressJet vs Republic Safety >

CommutAir vs ExpressJet vs Republic Safety

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

CommutAir vs ExpressJet vs Republic Safety

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2019 | 08:45 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FlyF35
I guess you are talking about this one?

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...unway-in-maine
Yeah. The news spun it well early as a runway excursion, but they never touched pavement.
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 02:50 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,888
Likes: 0
Default

The questions you ask are pretty subjective.
Better questions-
1. Is the training in house or third party?
2. If internal what’s the instructor average seniority?
3. Do they use AQP? If so, how long have they done so?
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 04:24 AM
  #13  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Blackhawk
The questions you ask are pretty subjective.
Better questions-
1. Is the training in house or third party?
2. If internal what’s the instructor average seniority?
3. Do they use AQP? If so, how long have they done so?
Thanks. Above are better questions.

I also like to hear safety culture for the regional. My understanding regional is subject to same FAA rules and regulations regarding safety.
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 05:41 AM
  #14  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Default

Safety culture is a much better metric.

I would say that zero fatal accidents over a decade is proof of safety. It’s unclear to me how that could be improved from a passenger standpoint
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 06:26 AM
  #15  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 23
From: It's a plane and it's a seat
Default

Originally Posted by ZeroTT
Safety culture is a much better metric.

I would say that zero fatal accidents over a decade is proof of safety. It’s unclear to me how that could be improved from a passenger standpoint
So you’re an outcome based pilot? As long as we get from point A to B without bending metal/killing someone it was safe....😳

There is a lot to safety more then accident rates.
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 07:23 AM
  #16  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2017
Posts: 969
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by FlyF35
Thanks. Above are better questions.

I also like to hear safety culture for the regional. My understanding regional is subject to same FAA rules and regulations regarding safety.
We operate under the same regulations as majors. Every. Single. One. We do the exact same job as them, just as well as them, only we get paid less then half as much.
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 07:27 AM
  #17  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 761
Likes: 7
Default

Why these regionals in particular? You left our more than half of the regional population.

It’s sort of immeasurable anyway.
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 08:12 AM
  #18  
ninerdriver's Avatar
Porco Rosso
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 2,522
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by knewyork
Why these regionals in particular? You left our more than half of the regional population.
Methinks someone is flying on United to/from/through EWR or IAD sometime soon.
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 09:17 AM
  #19  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

As a fellow nervous traveler, I try to find information on this topic too. I'm usually laughed at by pilots or at least reassured that flying is extremely safe. And like, yeah, I know that there's only been one fatality in commercial aviation in the US in the last 10 years. Nor have the E145 or E175 seen any fatal accidents. But as others have said, safety is more nuanced than the total number of fatalities. My main concern is poor maintenance, as mechanics seem to be criminally underpaid ($16 per hour?!) at most regionals, especially considering the complexity and importance of the job.



Consider the following Indeed.com review from a former Envoy mechanic:


Poor management, poor culture and I would not fly the planes that go out of these hangers as they do not have safe practices for engine work. They put customers and workers at risk. If you will notice, this ad for this location runs every 6 months, which is the most end of the probation period.... not a coincidence.

Or perhaps this quote from a former Republic mechanic:


some of the mechanics that work on their planes should have their licenses revoked from the FAA. Wrong engine valves changed, Static wicks adhered to the a/c with double sided tape. Wrong slat temp sensor harnesses replaced.

And of course, Envoy and Republic are *good* companies. I hate to imagine the standards at some of the more questionable regionals.



Honest question - what should passengers make of comments like this? Disgruntled employee? Problem with safety culture at Envoy? Bad management at this particular hangar? What happens when maintenance is lacking because management wants to save a few bucks? Does the FAA actually have the capacity to crack down on all this stuff, or do they only have time to go after the worst offenders?
Reply
Old 04-08-2019 | 10:32 AM
  #20  
Thread Starter
On Reserve
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by knewyork
Why these regionals in particular? You left our more than half of the regional population.

It’s sort of immeasurable anyway.
I picked these 3 regionals as they are often seen code shares out of hubs in NYC. Thanka.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdebrey
Regional
304
07-12-2019 04:25 PM
Kilroy
ExpressJet
10796
01-11-2016 06:49 AM
Duct Mon
Regional
266
07-31-2015 06:55 PM
Splanky
Regional
11
09-17-2008 02:52 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices