Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Airlines requiring part 117 extensions >

Airlines requiring part 117 extensions

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Airlines requiring part 117 extensions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-29-2019 | 12:15 PM
  #71  
trip's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Marine Corp
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,429
Likes: 14
Default

Originally Posted by JayBee
I'm assuming your being serious and not being facetious...

We were talking about anticipating delays and 117 extensions - not whether it was legal to depart or not. To answer your question directly if you are leaving and arriving within the same hour then the METAR is controlling (this is the Regional sub forum...).

To further the anticipating delays discussion - we have synoptic discussions, Satellite, IR, Radar, Constant Pressure charts, SFC plots, Skew-T, etc, etc.
For flights under 60 minutes to destination then meters must be considered, the lowest is controlling. So no you still can’t launch with TAF under mins.
If you’re going to argue that “unforeseen circumstances” weren’t unforeseen because charts showed this WX was forecast then I think you will lose that every time. Circumstance had to have been known in time for a schedule change to avoid. Schedules come out the month prior.
In short, WX, MECH, ATC, you can be extended, you may opt out, your options for that vary with airlines.
Reply
Old 07-30-2019 | 05:29 PM
  #72  
arbalist1's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Default

Found it, thanks to the guy that posted the site with the legal interpretations.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/practice_areas/regulations/interpretations/Data/interps/2014/Yu-Southwest%20Airlines%20Pilots%20Assoc%20-%20(2014)%20Legal%20Interpretation.pdf

It says it all right there about "automatic extensions." I was talking to my CA during my trip here at PSA, and it is a common belief that extensions are automatic here. Absolutely not true and here's the document that says as much. Spread the good word.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 12:37 PM
  #73  
JulesWinfield's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 278
Default

Originally Posted by arbalist1
Found it, thanks to the guy that posted the site with the legal interpretations.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/agc/practice_areas/regulations/interpretations/Data/interps/2014/Yu-Southwest%20Airlines%20Pilots%20Assoc%20-%20(2014)%20Legal%20Interpretation.pdf

It says it all right there about "automatic extensions." I was talking to my CA during my trip here at PSA, and it is a common belief that extensions are automatic here. Absolutely not true and here's the document that says as much. Spread the good word.
At 9e, our FOM says we automatically accept the 30 minute extension when we sign the release. Seems to match what that letter says.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 12:53 PM
  #74  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
At 9e, our FOM says we automatically accept the 30 minute extension when we sign the release. Seems to match what that letter says.
Yeah the 30 minute extension is automatic and holds no caveats, longer than 30 minutes and they will contact the pic to see if they'll accept the extension. My experience with PSA is that they usually only check with the Captain then assume the rest of the crew falls in with his or her decision.

That being said the only way to not accept the extension without talking to a chief is to call fatigued which is a pretty simple and painless process in my experience.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 01:07 PM
  #75  
rickair7777's Avatar
Prime Minister/Moderator
Veteran: Navy
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 45,129
Likes: 796
From: Engines Turn or People Swim
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260
Yeah the 30 minute extension is automatic and holds no caveats, longer than 30 minutes and they will contact the pic to see if they'll accept the extension. My experience with PSA is that they usually only check with the Captain then assume the rest of the crew falls in with his or her decision.

That being said the only way to not accept the extension without talking to a chief is to call fatigued which is a pretty simple and painless process in my experience.
How is that legal, unless you're already aware of the delay which requires an extension? It's not. Be careful out there.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 03:01 PM
  #76  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
At 9e, our FOM says we automatically accept the 30 minute extension when we sign the release. Seems to match what that letter says.
No, it does not. It specifically says the concurrence may not be prospective. The only time a 117 duty time signature on the release may be used for the 30 minute extension is when the need for the extension is known at the time of signature.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 03:03 PM
  #77  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by arbalist1
Found it, thanks to the guy that posted the site with the legal interpretations.

https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org...rpretation.pdf

It says it all right there about "automatic extensions." I was talking to my CA during my trip here at PSA, and it is a common belief that extensions are automatic here. Absolutely not true and here's the document that says as much. Spread the good word.
You’re welcome. When I was at the regional level where they played games with extension rules I used to carry a few printouts of the more important interpretations in my kitbag. Now they’re all on pdf, but thankfully my carrier is even more conservative than I am.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 03:04 PM
  #78  
Cujo665's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 3,578
Likes: 48
From: Semi-Retired...
Default

Originally Posted by Approach1260
Yeah the 30 minute extension is automatic and holds no caveats, longer than 30 minutes and they will contact the pic to see if they'll accept the extension. My experience with PSA is that they usually only check with the Captain then assume the rest of the crew falls in with his or her decision.

That being said the only way to not accept the extension without talking to a chief is to call fatigued which is a pretty simple and painless process in my experience.
What you just described is not a legal extension.
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 04:02 PM
  #79  
Line Holder
Veteran: Air Force
 
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 565
Likes: 6
From: Poolside
Default

Originally Posted by JulesWinfield
At 9e, our FOM says we automatically accept the 30 minute extension when we sign the release. Seems to match what that letter says.
Then your FOM needs to go back to the POI with a copy of the interpretation attached. 14 CFR 121.135(a)(4) says the manual may “not be contrary to any applicable Federal regulation...”
Reply
Old 08-08-2019 | 05:56 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Peabody17
Then your FOM needs to go back to the POI with a copy of the interpretation attached. 14 CFR 121.135(a)(4) says the manual may “not be contrary to any applicable Federal regulation...”
The real question is, who is the brave soul that’s going to risk their career over it?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iFlyRC
Mesa Airlines
6904
10-23-2020 04:15 AM
FutureJetPilot
Regional
0
01-04-2014 06:46 AM
skylover
Aviation Law
482
11-14-2013 08:20 PM
Sir James
Major
1
07-17-2005 08:47 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices