Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Regional
Boeing eying new 50 seater RJ. >

Boeing eying new 50 seater RJ.

Search

Notices
Regional Regional Airlines

Boeing eying new 50 seater RJ.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-08-2019 | 02:49 PM
  #21  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 718
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Aeirum
I don’t understand why this is so hard. They need to make a Falcon 7x RJ. End of story
This is you being funny, right?
Reply
Old 10-08-2019 | 04:13 PM
  #22  
majorpilot's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 513
Likes: 0
From: Line holder
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer
The technology already exists in high end drones that will automatically follow a pre set flight plan and land in the event of loss of signal from the drone operator. It probably wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to equip airplanes with similar technology for single pilot ops. You’d have some sort of button or control that needs to be pushed or manipulated at regular intervals, if the pilot fails to push the button at the right time, the autonomous aircraft would simply squawk emergency and land at the nearest airport.



I seriously don’t see this happening within the remainder of my flying career, but there’s absolutely no stopping technological advances, no matter how hard we fight it. Once it presents a significant cost savings and is “safe enough”, it will be implemented.


It is usually foolish to bet against technological progress. But there is another side to this “progress”: the technical savvy of those who attack and compromise these advanced systems.

Unless and until automated vehicles can be reliably demonstrated to be “unhackable,” l don’t expect them to be whizzing by in large numbers in the next lane or over our heads.
Reply
Old 10-08-2019 | 05:14 PM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer
The technology already exists in high end drones that will automatically follow a pre set flight plan and land in the event of loss of signal from the drone operator. It probably wouldn’t be too much of a stretch to equip airplanes with similar technology for single pilot ops. You’d have some sort of button or control that needs to be pushed or manipulated at regular intervals, if the pilot fails to push the button at the right time, the autonomous aircraft would simply squawk emergency and land at the nearest airport.

I seriously don’t see this happening within the remainder of my flying career, but there’s absolutely no stopping technological advances, no matter how hard we fight it. Once it presents a significant cost savings and is “safe enough”, it will be implemented.
Technology exists- yes.
The success rate of this technology is not at a level that the flying public will accept.
One model of drone right now (the MQ-9) is running at a accident of 4 accidents for every 292,000 hours.
And that one is the most successful drone in operation.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/y...dy-since-2011/
Reply
Old 10-08-2019 | 05:48 PM
  #24  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by FMGEC
Technology exists- yes.
The success rate of this technology is not at a level that the flying public will accept.
One model of drone right now (the MQ-9) is running at a accident of 4 accidents for every 292,000 hours.
And that one is the most successful drone in operation.
https://www.militarytimes.com/news/y...dy-since-2011/
That’s why I think it won’t be remotely feasible until well after I’m retired. My best uneducated guess would be a least 30-40 years out.
Reply
Old 10-08-2019 | 06:17 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2019
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Default

And the MQ-9 is still flown by two human pilots for takeoff and landing, and the pilots are within close proximity at the airfield.
Reply
Old 10-09-2019 | 08:36 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2018
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Default

As long as regional airports survive, there will be a market for 50-70 seat aircraft.

The mainline system can’t function without regionals feeding passengers to it.
Reply
Old 10-09-2019 | 09:32 AM
  #27  
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Flyboy68
As long as regional airports survive, there will be a market for 50-70 seat aircraft.

The mainline system can’t function without regionals feeding passengers to it.
Southwest, Spirit and Frontier seem to be doing just fine without regional feeders. Not every one-horse town needs to have scheduled air service since 99% of America lives within a two hour drive of a major airport.
Reply
Old 10-09-2019 | 09:46 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer
Southwest, Spirit and Frontier seem to be doing just fine without regional feeders. Not every one-horse town needs to have scheduled air service since 99% of America lives within a two hour drive of a major airport.
Not to mention back in the day those one horse towns got 100+ seat service...
Reply
Old 10-09-2019 | 10:06 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Upright
Default

Originally Posted by DarkSideMoon
Not to mention back in the day those one horse towns got 100+ seat service...
Oh, so true!

People have forgotten about the days of small airports served by F100s, DC-9s, and 737-200s.
Reply
Old 10-09-2019 | 11:37 AM
  #30  
New Hire
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Rahlifer
Southwest, Spirit and Frontier seem to be doing just fine without regional feeders. Not every one-horse town needs to have scheduled air service since 99% of America lives within a two hour drive of a major airport.
How do you think United, Delta and American fill up their widebody planes? It is with feed off the regionals! Look at how many wide bodies Southwest, Spirit and Frontier have-Zero.

Regionals expand the mainline airline’s route system allowing for more destinations and larger aircraft out of their hubs to many international destinations that would be unprofitable without the feed!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bucking Bar
Major
97
03-21-2011 03:03 PM
b82rez
Major
728
03-31-2010 06:10 PM
ToiletDuck
Hangar Talk
11
04-03-2008 09:35 AM
vagabond
Technical
3
09-06-2007 02:51 PM
SWAjet
Major
0
03-07-2005 09:48 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices